Educate me, sensei. But first, in your own words, explain to me what I was saying in my comment. Just so I can make sure weāre on the same page here.
You basically say that the likelyhood of a meaningful connection of the Hendersen Zip Code given in Q's post #871 to it being where the woman traveled from to pimp her child is low.l
However, these connections are more than serendipitous and do more than just give the discerning faith.
They cause research to happen which furthers the Great Awakening.
I think you misread or misunderstood sourcesPleaseās comment (as have others). Saying the chances are not good agrees with OPās assertion, that it is not likely to be coincidence. It also states that the event is ālow probability and high impactā which necessarily means itās connected.
Thatās why he or she even followed up asking you to explain how you understood the comment because it was clear from your response that you didnāt.
You have much to learn, Grasshopper.
Educate me, sensei. But first, in your own words, explain to me what I was saying in my comment. Just so I can make sure weāre on the same page here.
You basically say that the likelyhood of a meaningful connection of the Hendersen Zip Code given in Q's post #871 to it being where the woman traveled from to pimp her child is low.l
However, these connections are more than serendipitous and do more than just give the discerning faith.
They cause research to happen which furthers the Great Awakening.
That's why your vote tally is negative.
I think you misread or misunderstood sourcesPleaseās comment (as have others). Saying the chances are not good agrees with OPās assertion, that it is not likely to be coincidence. It also states that the event is ālow probability and high impactā which necessarily means itās connected.
Thatās why he or she even followed up asking you to explain how you understood the comment because it was clear from your response that you didnāt.