I don’t care what the date is on the article. I care about the Content.
I care that people that don’t know about this, are waking up and being able to read it today. That’s all I care about
Who cares if it was released six months ago, or today, or both. The fact of the matter is that the information is getting brought back to the forefront again.
If they had this posted in the beginning of the article, LIKE THEY ARE JOURNALISTICALLY REQUIRED, then there would be no issue. You're allowing your love of the content to blind you from the principle.
As it stands, this is clickbait and an old article posing as news (in order to get more click$$$).
The article is dated today, as if it's fresh off the press. A newspaper wouldn't print an old headline and news story under the current date.
Right. Because MSM is ethical!
Are you being thick on purpose? OP posted a NEW ARTICLE that presents OLD NEWS
I don’t care!
I don’t care what the date is on the article. I care about the Content.
I care that people that don’t know about this, are waking up and being able to read it today. That’s all I care about
Who cares if it was released six months ago, or today, or both. The fact of the matter is that the information is getting brought back to the forefront again.
If they had this posted in the beginning of the article, LIKE THEY ARE JOURNALISTICALLY REQUIRED, then there would be no issue. You're allowing your love of the content to blind you from the principle.
As it stands, this is clickbait and an old article posing as news (in order to get more click$$$).