I smiled at that, but it'll turn off normies who we share it with.
Sending normies actual studies means they won't read them, so quick "highlight" articles like this would be effective if not for the weighted language.
Does the doctor who wrote it even understand what he was reading?
Using an in silico approach
That means a COMPUTER PROGRAM. There were NO humans. NO monkeys. NO dogs. NO mice. Not even so much as a petrie dish or test tube.
It was done in a computer, which was programed to use certain inputs, run a pre-determined software program, and spit out an answer that was NOTHING to do with anything in the real world. Garbage in, garbage out.
demonstrated the possible mechanism of action
Possible. Lemme guess. That means "we need to do more research" which means "we need more MONEY."
Possible mechanism is an hypothesis. It is NOT a conclusion.
ivermectin fights Chinese Germs
There is no such thing as a "germ" -- Chinese or otherwise.
There are microorganisms, such as bacteria and parasites, but not germs. And not viruses.
Through molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation
Get that? SIMULATION.
The science is clear: Ivermectin is a safe and effective remedy for covid
It may be, but this paper does not come anywhere close to proving it.
These are powerful findings
No, they are nothing more than guesses.
While ivermectin is traditionally used to fight malaria and parasites
Yes, that does seem to be true. So, let's find out why it works on malaria, and then maybe we can figure out how it heals the body, more generally.
a recent study claims that the drug inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in in vitro
In vitro = in a test tube or petrie dish, and NOT in a living organism. Let's see the study. Did they use monkey kidney cells ("vero cells")? I will bet anything they did, and then did they also reduce the toxic antibiotics they normally use? Was that the real effect? This statement means nothing without proper context.
a recent study claims that the drug inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in in vitro
No, actually it isn't. You (the author of the article, Dr. Eddy) did not cite ANYTHING.
but the evidence speaks for itself.
No, it doesn't speak anything because it is not evidence. It is a COMPUTER SIMULATION, and nothing more.
our in silico data have indicated that ivermectin efficiently utilizes viral spike protein
Nonsense. "Dr." Eddy needs to go back to school and learn how to read.
I just took my daily dose about 20 minutes ago. Than along with the other things I am taking will mute the damage from the clot shot i was mandated into taking. Fingers crossed.
In my case, ivermectin helped a LOT with exposure to viral shedding, which caused me to get shingles and a chronic low-grade cough. I took it for five days, and it helped clear up all the symptoms I got from being around recently vaxxed people.
NAC, Vit C, Vit D, Zinc, Aspirin, Tumeric, and of course Ivermectin......The ivermectin is every day day before, day of and two more days when I took the clot shot. After that ivermectin every 5 or 6 days, and the other ones every day.
They say that there are parasites in the shots, ivermectin kills them. It also might interfere with the spike proteins.
Thanks. Can get everything in canada except I might have some difficulty getting the ivermectin. Fuckers must have "banned" it. Already ordered the NAC zinc and other easy to get vitamins.
Did you get the 2 stroke pokes? Did everything went well up to date?
This is how I look at it, it’s best to remove germs as best as possible. There were some studies done on people in the ICU and they all had dirty mouths. You’re sick,you don’t brush your teeth. That’s where they hatch though, you can try to remove them a lot of ways but it should be done with multiple approaches. Just ivermectin may not cut it but with other things combined it’s a fairly benign and safe drug to try.
Biggest thing with colds, flus is to use a 1:4 hydrogen peroxide solution, a few times a day in cold flu season along with flossing.
We give antibiotics before dental work because gums are so dirty we have a constant drip of germs leaking into the blood stream and it leads to strokes, heart attacks. If you open that up with more soft tissue damage in the mouth the bacteria fills the blood stream, or viruses. Viruses infest the soft tissue in the nose and mouth, you get a red nose and sore throat. It’s leaking from there. Clean that shit out of there. Hydrogen peroxide is basically a safe bleaching agent and it’s what immune cells emit toward a germ. Then it swallows the germ and puts it in a cell pouch with more H2O2. I can cite all of this.
Germs leaked into the blood stream cause inflammation. Inflammation causes immune activity which raises body inflammation, vessel inflammation and for reasons it’s hard to teach easily this leads to clots. Vaccine clots are because of immune activation by injecting it right in the blood supply. (We can lower inflammation with fish oil btw)
So much of the problem in flu deaths are these dirty mouths leaking shit into the bloodstream. Clean your mouth, I do the lower nose too, with h202 which kills even HIV or Ebola.
If you’re out and about and you get a sniff of germs remove them early and consistently. Twice a day mouth care everyday. Then things like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin will work better. It’s silly to dump a chemical on a mound of germs. Remove them, then add the chemical. People aren’t following basic hygiene that would lower risks and this is why those studies vary so much and it looks like it doesn’t work. Half the people have poor hygiene blowing any positive work the drug is doing.
There is no such thing as a "germ." There are bacteria and parasites and maybe other microorganisms, but not "germs."
That’s where they hatch though
What scientific evidence do you have for that statement?
We give antibiotics before dental work because ...
The real reason is because dentists also buy into the false paradigm of "Germ Theory."
constant drip of germs leaking into the blood stream and it leads to strokes, heart attacks.
I will bet there is not a single, scientific study that shows this.
the bacteria fills the blood stream
Yes, that is their job. They are supposed to be there. They are the body's cleaners.
Viruses infest the soft tissue ...
Viruses do not exist. At least, there is no proof that they do. Again, it is the false paradigm of "Germ Theory."
Germs leaked into the blood stream cause inflammation.
It is more likely that poor nutrition and external toxins create inflammation. It certainly cannot be germs, because they do not exist. If it is bacteria to which you refer by using the term "germ," then those are supposed to be there. They are not harmful to humans.
Inflammation causes immune activity which raises body inflammation
Circular logic, which is a logical fallacy. Inflammation causes ... inflammation? No.
and for reasons it’s hard to teach easily this leads to clots.
Does that mean YOU do not understand it?
So much of the problem in flu deaths are these dirty mouths leaking shit into the bloodstream.
Where is the science to support that claim?
h202 which kills even HIV or Ebola.
You do NOT have any proof of that. These viruses are the figment of virologists' imaginations.
People aren’t following basic hygiene that would lower risks and this is why those studies vary so much and it looks like it doesn’t work.
Or maybe ... just maybe ... Germ Theory is a false perspective on reality.
You can even alternate with salt water, if you don’t have any peroxide. This was a habit everyone had in the past but our culture now is so much worse with hygiene. I even try to get my Covid patients to gargle and they won’t do it. They can’t see what’s happening so to them it’s not happening. I’d bet my life on it if people gargled with salt or peroxide, had strong teeth and gums, they wouldnt have any strokes and infections would be limited.
Spice up your hygiene with oil pulling. Grab any oil, coconut oil for the win, and swish it around after gargling. It reinforces the skin protection, suffocates germs, it’s a layer they can’t swim through to get to your skin. It’s also slippery and makes removing them easier next time. Don’t be surprised to find large chunks of food removed from hard to get spots and you’ll be damn surprised what’s in your mouth after you do this. That food is rotting in there and full of germs.
When a person has food with carbohydrate stuck between their teeth for a period of time, the bacteria eat it. But in the process, the sugar in the food breaks down and causes harm to the teeth.
From the article " ivermectin fights Chinese Germs ....". He also refers to it as Fauci Flu. One of us? OP is the author? Cool.
I smiled at that, but it'll turn off normies who we share it with.
Sending normies actual studies means they won't read them, so quick "highlight" articles like this would be effective if not for the weighted language.
That article is complete nonsense.
Does the doctor who wrote it even understand what he was reading?
That means a COMPUTER PROGRAM. There were NO humans. NO monkeys. NO dogs. NO mice. Not even so much as a petrie dish or test tube.
It was done in a computer, which was programed to use certain inputs, run a pre-determined software program, and spit out an answer that was NOTHING to do with anything in the real world. Garbage in, garbage out.
Possible. Lemme guess. That means "we need to do more research" which means "we need more MONEY."
Possible mechanism is an hypothesis. It is NOT a conclusion.
There is no such thing as a "germ" -- Chinese or otherwise.
There are microorganisms, such as bacteria and parasites, but not germs. And not viruses.
Get that? SIMULATION.
It may be, but this paper does not come anywhere close to proving it.
No, they are nothing more than guesses.
Yes, that does seem to be true. So, let's find out why it works on malaria, and then maybe we can figure out how it heals the body, more generally.
In vitro = in a test tube or petrie dish, and NOT in a living organism. Let's see the study. Did they use monkey kidney cells ("vero cells")? I will bet anything they did, and then did they also reduce the toxic antibiotics they normally use? Was that the real effect? This statement means nothing without proper context.
No, actually it isn't. You (the author of the article, Dr. Eddy) did not cite ANYTHING.
No, it doesn't speak anything because it is not evidence. It is a COMPUTER SIMULATION, and nothing more.
Nonsense. "Dr." Eddy needs to go back to school and learn how to read.
You're absolutely right....
Trust the SOYence.
ROR
I just took my daily dose about 20 minutes ago. Than along with the other things I am taking will mute the damage from the clot shot i was mandated into taking. Fingers crossed.
Best of luck!
what are the other things? and why take ivermectin since it cures covid, not the vaxx itself? Thanks
In my case, ivermectin helped a LOT with exposure to viral shedding, which caused me to get shingles and a chronic low-grade cough. I took it for five days, and it helped clear up all the symptoms I got from being around recently vaxxed people.
NAC, Vit C, Vit D, Zinc, Aspirin, Tumeric, and of course Ivermectin......The ivermectin is every day day before, day of and two more days when I took the clot shot. After that ivermectin every 5 or 6 days, and the other ones every day.
They say that there are parasites in the shots, ivermectin kills them. It also might interfere with the spike proteins.
Thanks. Can get everything in canada except I might have some difficulty getting the ivermectin. Fuckers must have "banned" it. Already ordered the NAC zinc and other easy to get vitamins.
Did you get the 2 stroke pokes? Did everything went well up to date?
But has it REALLY had expensive Phase four human clinical studies done it? The @*#&$% science experts.
No, of course not.
It's nice that we can commiserate in such familiar company MAG768...
There are long term studies being done.
This is how I look at it, it’s best to remove germs as best as possible. There were some studies done on people in the ICU and they all had dirty mouths. You’re sick,you don’t brush your teeth. That’s where they hatch though, you can try to remove them a lot of ways but it should be done with multiple approaches. Just ivermectin may not cut it but with other things combined it’s a fairly benign and safe drug to try.
Biggest thing with colds, flus is to use a 1:4 hydrogen peroxide solution, a few times a day in cold flu season along with flossing.
We give antibiotics before dental work because gums are so dirty we have a constant drip of germs leaking into the blood stream and it leads to strokes, heart attacks. If you open that up with more soft tissue damage in the mouth the bacteria fills the blood stream, or viruses. Viruses infest the soft tissue in the nose and mouth, you get a red nose and sore throat. It’s leaking from there. Clean that shit out of there. Hydrogen peroxide is basically a safe bleaching agent and it’s what immune cells emit toward a germ. Then it swallows the germ and puts it in a cell pouch with more H2O2. I can cite all of this.
Germs leaked into the blood stream cause inflammation. Inflammation causes immune activity which raises body inflammation, vessel inflammation and for reasons it’s hard to teach easily this leads to clots. Vaccine clots are because of immune activation by injecting it right in the blood supply. (We can lower inflammation with fish oil btw)
So much of the problem in flu deaths are these dirty mouths leaking shit into the bloodstream. Clean your mouth, I do the lower nose too, with h202 which kills even HIV or Ebola.
If you’re out and about and you get a sniff of germs remove them early and consistently. Twice a day mouth care everyday. Then things like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin will work better. It’s silly to dump a chemical on a mound of germs. Remove them, then add the chemical. People aren’t following basic hygiene that would lower risks and this is why those studies vary so much and it looks like it doesn’t work. Half the people have poor hygiene blowing any positive work the drug is doing.
Where? By whom?
There is no such thing as a "germ." There are bacteria and parasites and maybe other microorganisms, but not "germs."
What scientific evidence do you have for that statement?
The real reason is because dentists also buy into the false paradigm of "Germ Theory."
I will bet there is not a single, scientific study that shows this.
Yes, that is their job. They are supposed to be there. They are the body's cleaners.
Viruses do not exist. At least, there is no proof that they do. Again, it is the false paradigm of "Germ Theory."
It is more likely that poor nutrition and external toxins create inflammation. It certainly cannot be germs, because they do not exist. If it is bacteria to which you refer by using the term "germ," then those are supposed to be there. They are not harmful to humans.
Circular logic, which is a logical fallacy. Inflammation causes ... inflammation? No.
Does that mean YOU do not understand it?
Where is the science to support that claim?
You do NOT have any proof of that. These viruses are the figment of virologists' imaginations.
Or maybe ... just maybe ... Germ Theory is a false perspective on reality.
You should check your premises.
In my adult life, I've largely avoided doctors but I do get my teeth cleaned every 6 months.
I swear by my dental irrigator.
(Waterpik is one brand of dental irrigator for those who don't know what that means. It's basically a machine that shoots water in between your gums.)
You can even alternate with salt water, if you don’t have any peroxide. This was a habit everyone had in the past but our culture now is so much worse with hygiene. I even try to get my Covid patients to gargle and they won’t do it. They can’t see what’s happening so to them it’s not happening. I’d bet my life on it if people gargled with salt or peroxide, had strong teeth and gums, they wouldnt have any strokes and infections would be limited.
Spice up your hygiene with oil pulling. Grab any oil, coconut oil for the win, and swish it around after gargling. It reinforces the skin protection, suffocates germs, it’s a layer they can’t swim through to get to your skin. It’s also slippery and makes removing them easier next time. Don’t be surprised to find large chunks of food removed from hard to get spots and you’ll be damn surprised what’s in your mouth after you do this. That food is rotting in there and full of germs.
When a person has food with carbohydrate stuck between their teeth for a period of time, the bacteria eat it. But in the process, the sugar in the food breaks down and causes harm to the teeth.
It is not the bacteria. It is the sugar.
https://web.archive.org/web/20211222185452/https://dreddymd.com/2021/09/10/science-paper-how-ivermectin-blocks-viral-replication-of-sars-cov-2/
Just in case it is ever needed