Far right is totalitarian. We have now moved left as we are now advocating for individual freedoms. Human rights have become a progressive idea.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
WRONG. The "far right is fascist" is a made up bullshit lie spread by the globalists.
Far LEFT is totalitarian (socialist, fascist, Nazi)
Far right is pro individual freedoms (anarchism, libertarianism, conservatism)
Wrong.
Left and Right are contrivances of our would be controllers. BOTH are their design, not just "the Left."
They have been controlled opposition since they were first conceived. See the "Y-head" with its "Left Wing" (left facing head eagle) and "Right Wing" (right facing head eagle).
All of our ideologies are controlled opposition. One side may get more "truth" than the other, but neither gets the Truth, and both are told "the other side is lying" to keep us looking at each other as the enemy.
If you ever think "the right" is in "the right" you are controlled opposition.
There is no left and right, only We The People and the PTB.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zCBNwGHPZ2M
Of course there is a distinction. If there were no distinction the tool of divide (as the first part of "divide and conquer") wouldn't work.
The point was not that there was no distinction, but that they are the design of the PTB (bankers, cabal, whatever you want to call them).
Left and Right are a fraud. As long as you adhere to one side or another, you are fully enmeshed in The Matrix.
Funny that once you dig deep enough you find the controllers are the ancient Phonecian bloodlines.. and the phonecian symbol was... the two headed bird! Those bastards have been at it a long long time.
Anyway there are clearly philosophical differences between us but they are amped up and used to distract everyone from the long con
An evolving changing government ("liberal") v. an unchanging, "let's hold on to our roots" government ("conservative") is an obvious dividing line. Once the line is created, dueling narratives can drive the two sides. Do you think it is an accident that the "two sides" have always been pretty close in size to each other throughout history?
It has always been controlled opposition. The "philosophical differences" are by design, micromanaged by the narratives, always under their control.
I'm not talking about "bad actors." I'm talking about the control structures, their origins, their designs, the media that each side puts out, etc. They are both the design of the system; The Matrix.
That may be the case in 2021, but for the other 5000 years or so of "left/right" history, this statement doesn't match reality. In fact it has flipped back and forth, applying totalitarianism to both the left and the right numerous times in history.
The standard definition of left/right is a "left" wants change, "right" wants to stay the same. That is where "liberal" and "conservative" come from.
There is another axis to these political definitions (as in, how they are defined, not "your idea" of them). That axis is the Libertarian/Totalitarian axis. Putting those axes together you get Fascism as the "conservative" totalitarianism, and Communism as the "liberal" totalitarianism. That is their definitions.
As an example of what this dual axis political spectrum might look like, look at this picture.
As that picture shows, fascism/communism are two sides of the same "socialism" coin. They even have the same origins. In one case applying economic Marxism to a "conservative ideology" and in the other case applying that economy to a "liberal ideology". Both arriving at the same conclusion starting from the left or the right.
If you want to make shit up, you can do that all day long, but that is how these things are defined. The truth is though, they are all contrivances of control.
Do more investigation and you will find that they are used to control the world, and have been for millennia, both the design of the PTB.
How is this in any way a rebuttal? Either try to engage in rational conversation or don't bother replying at all.
Untrue. When you are open to life as a phenomenon experienced as a living being and not as something framed by some constructed identity you see a lot of "leftists" are basically right wing people with gay friends or black nephews and shit.
They used too but then like usual Democrats happend and the Republicans held out there hand and mumbled something
There is no "far right". Agreed.
Left / right paradigm doesn't exist.
Left and right was traditionally applied (since the french revolution) to only how one views the economy. Libertarian (i.e. a free market, private ownership etc.) vs Planned Edocnomy (i.e. communism). All of a sudden every policy/social policy, value-based policy and opinion had to be forced into this narrow worldview - including things like immigration policy, views on LGBT+^2, equality , environment or foreign policy. It's just nuts to call something "right wing" today, since so many of the social policies etc. completely differ according to the individual. That the "far right" is fascist, racist, etc. is just completely nuts and wrong and a mislabelling of the term "far right". "Far right" is as stated just pro individual freedom and private ownership. Just because these people keep trying to coerce new meanings onto words doesn't make them so.
What about all of the totalitarian Right people? Normal right voters even often say stupid shit like "kill drug dealers." Bomb whole peoples into extinction.
Nonsense. Utter nonsense.
You can browse that sentiment here on .win
Glowfags gonna glow.
Yes - but that's not because they are "totalitarian right". Right originally stems from the french revolution and meant pro individual freedom. You can't be pro individual freedom and then wanting to kill drug dealers (aka. dealing in drugs should be fully legal if you're pro individual freedom). "Bomb whole people into extinction" people are just totalitarian nutters - nothing much to do with the traditional term of "Right". The term has been co-opted.
Tell that to 40 million voters who call themselves Right Wing and endorse those policies and prop up 4 thousand statesmen who campaign on that spirit
Why are anons such solid state entities who think that there's this pure Platonic ideal to every word, and unwilling to accept that words are just monkey sounds we make to label things around and within us? Each monkey slightly changes the definition each time he uses a word. We're at least 100 years past what youre even talking about.
The indisputable fully full on fact is what slyver is saying: tje Right is a control system too. It's meant to take all the basically dutiful people and turn their decency and sense of duty into something useful for their war and torture domination machine. That's why they cheer the same police who rob and murder and extort and contain us and why they defend the wealth of the world's richest pirates. Because they are misled by controlled opposition that stirs them against other victims of that domination.
Right by definition is hierarchical. My point this that we have become the advocate for those rejected by the system. The system is extreme hierarchy (social/communistic) we are advocating for humans rights as a reply to the extreme hierarchy.
Totalitarianism, fascism, and socialism were always risks of leftist extremes.
The more right you go the more freedoms until you hit the extreme of anarchy / wild west. Hard to get fascism or totalitarianism when your slider requires less and less government oversight or dictated control, you know?
Hope this didn't blow anyone's mind :)
It's true. The left hates rights which is why they are cool with totalitarian governments that force the people down in the name of some murky sense of the greater good.
If you are unable to control your own emotions, someone else will always be happy to step in and do it for you. Puppet masters need their puppets.
Hope it didn't blow anyone's mind, because it's the truth.
When the pendulum swings too far "left" you land in the extreme "right", They have been teetering at swinging over the top axis for a bit now.
Precisely.
left/right is an illusion created to divide us
there is no left vs right
there is only down vs up
most of our "leftist" neighbors are victims. they are still our brothers.
frankly a lot of our "conservative" brothers are victims too.
One isn't inherently right or wrong. Just commenting on the shift in the last 18 months
I always thought that the far left and the far right meet up round the back!
They do.
Two horn tips almost touching each other.
Wrong. Left and right come from some an archaic understanding of politics wherein the aristocrats of France sat on the right, thereby cementing the (rather deleterious and erroneous) idea of conservatism being on the right.
Socialists have tried to rationalize this with an "updated" definition of right and left but can't contend with the fact that classical liberals, aka the Republican party of oIde, used to be considered leftists. Yes, they were progressive for their time, but no, there was no party shift in ideals outside of the crony types that perpetrated politics. The reason why the classical liberals are considered CONSERVATIVES aka right leaning is because the progressive agenda of the classical liberals, aka individual rights, autonomy, and free-speech, had become mainstay.
They also claim that the far-right nationalist agenda is predicated upon racism but don't seem to ever acknowledge the fact that far-left Stalin was heavily nationalistic and a huge racist. To those who would like to contend with the latter, read a history book.
They also hate the inconvenient truth that Benito had been a member of the socialist party before splintering to a nationalistic agenda, that the Nazi party was a shortened version of Nationalist Socialism, that Hitler had been calling out corporations for their inhumane treatment of workers, that he said the German people and the Bolsheviks (communists) had more in common than with the bureaucrats in Europe, or that according to Benito's manifesto itself, Fascism is meant to be the merger of big corporation and big g 0 v. That the market wasn't an open one like in the boogeyman that is capitalism, but rather only opened to people who towed the party line. SOUND FAMILIAR, LEFTISTS?!?
The truth is, politics extends into multiple axis, more than just the one. It's far too complex to be put into a single line.
Stop using the enemies terms for things.
Fren, the enemy is anyone against individual freedoms