Connected Post: https://greatawakening.win/p/140vezvi9I/i-have-been-trying-to-gain-a-rea/
Here's my stance on the Confederacy versus the Union:
I'm still working on it, but it's what the history books won't tell you.
Get ready for a history lesson...
The Union primarily consisted of checkered isles and peninsulas, with many bays, and many avenues for world commerce.
Many factories opened up there, with plenty access to running water for steam engines and water wheels.
With the explosion of the textile, sugar, tobacco, and produce, the South was perfectly tailored for agriculture.
So, we had a system where the North ruled industry, and the South ruled resources.
The North got wealthy on account of being on the global profit end of the supply chain.
The South, naturally, wanted to have industry on its own.
The North began to suppress the South's attempts at industry. Assassinations, banking schemes, and fraud as the usual tools.
Why?
Because the South had Slaves and the North didn't. The South had resources, and the North didn't. If the South achieved slaves, resources, and industry they would rule the nation, if not the world, hands down.
Cheap labor, access to resources, and new technology allowing for stream-lined shipping methods through trains and steam-ships.
So, after a long train of abuses by the North, the South got pissed and began to draft ways to split away and follow its own laws.
But that's only what was happening on the surface.
Enter Lincoln.
Lincoln knew a nation divided will inevitably fall. Specifically, he knew that the entire conflict was conflated by international banking schemes that ran the industry of the North and were intentionally putting pressure on the South in order to get the South to rebel.
They also would then have owned all the industry that the fledgling South planned on setting up, due to the debts created to run the war and foot the bill of factories.
It was a rigged game from the start.
Keep in mind, the majority of people saw Slavery as a way of life and essential to competing on the world stage. In fact, if not for the US Textile industry, most of the world would have been naked. No one even thought for a second that the world could run without slaves.
So, Lincoln spotted an opportunity to stop them from playing their game.
He entered into their scheme, feigned being an Illinois made-man (Illinois was always corrupt) and rose to the top.
When he saw an opportunity, he lunged for the White House and rode on the creation of the Republican ticket (a brand new party) that targeted the popular sentiments in the North. Up until then, the Democrat party was the oldest and largest party, due in part to the opposition being stuck bouncing between many smaller parties.
Lincoln took an economic war and sought to reframe it as a war ON Slavery, rather than a war OVER Slavery.
Well, shit, the international banking weren't expecting that. They need slavery if the South was gonna make it. The time table they were working on was shortened, and they had to act fast.
Lincoln dropped the veil on the real problem in the world, indentured servitude to a caste of elite cronies, and attempted to expose exactly what was going on -- that the banking elites were simultaneously destroying the US while making a new, perfect "Zionist" slave nation that controlled the world's textile, produce, tobacco, and now industry.
The only notch left was industry, and the global elite had already bankrolled the Democrat party to cause as much division as possible as a pretense to crush the North.
Lincoln was the only one saying we had to stay together.
They framed him as a bleeding-heart slave lover, but that actually helped his cause. He used that as fuel to pretense the Civil War as one about the Rights of Man rather than the Rights of Business.
In effect, he used all their momentum against them and they got really, really pissed.
As a result, they made sure to make it the bloodiest war they possibly could. They knew they had lost, but they needed to punish the U.S. and especially Lincoln for spoiling their efforts.
If they couldn't claim the U.S., they would destroy it.
Lincoln fought well, however, and eventually got the support he needed using blackmail on the Democrats and lousy Republican fence-sitters(RINOs).
His hands weren't the cleanest by the end of it all...
Grant was a traitor, though, and when push came to shove he sold Lincoln out.
War ended, Lincoln assassinated, Grant takes over, US declares bankruptcy, and we can all speculate from there when it come to USA Corp.
Civil Rights comes along and Kennedy tries to do the same thing.
He dies, but not before making serious strides in Civil Rights.
The Democrats had to re-brand. Being the racists was a losing-formula. They knew they couldn't sell slavery and figured that was one of the many reasons Lincoln thwarted them once before. They spend the next two decades to frame the Republican party as the party of racists, helped by many RINOs. Instead, they shifted to a mental plantation predicated on harvesting votes from wage slaves.
Reagan comes along and tries to take off where Kennedy left off.
Gets shot in the process, but discovers that advances in technology have made this a FAR bigger game than can be solved in a single generation. The bad guys had too much control, and to do what is necessary to defeat them would result in the host dying along with the parasite. The best he could do was to take out their new "South" which was the Soviet Union.
H.W. Takes control, and the NWO seems guaranteed. China now bears the crest of the "South," only this time they will own the industry. The South lost before because it didn't have the ability to make war supplies. They think it will be different this time.
Trump comes along and, holy shit, he's pulling a Lincoln.
That's why Trump compares himself to Lincoln, because he is.
Except now he's having to play on a reversed battlefield as compared to Lincoln. Now, Republicans are the racists. Now, Republicans are the top 1% elite. Now, Republicans are against voting rights. Now, Republicans are against science (industry).
He is playing the same game Lincoln did, but without all of Lincoln's cards.
Despite that, Trump still played the game. He is lifting the veil on the greatest, most widespread sin of Man.
Slavery.
This time, failure is not an option. Unlike Reagan, we have mastered their new technologies and are using it against them.
Digital Battlefield. Information War.
And in them, the most powerful tool ever held by the hands of Man.
The one thing they cannot understand.
Memes.
Yup.
Memes are Truth distilled into a universal language.
Memes that fail do so because they do not bear the Truth.
We have the Truth on our side now, and we cannot fail when we act on behalf of the Way the Truth and the Life.
Fantastic post OP!! I always thought Grant was sus.... Love me a little true history of the world!!
Yeah, Grant was a louse.
Consider the stigma around him -- that he was a terrible drunk.
Drunkenness is code for someone who is easy to fool / catch in a blackmail scheme.
When someone is drunk they may do things they regret; and things they may not remember.
In other words, things they get framed for.
Trump has made sure to mention he's never gotten drunk, which is to say he never put himself in a compromising position.
That's code for him assuring White Hats and Patriots who are in the know that Trump has no skeletons in the closet that they can use against him and that he has committed to staying completely "sober" until the job is done; no fun/letting your guard down until the war is over.
If we ever see Trump drink some hard liquor, we will know either he has been compromised or that the war is over and it's time to celebrate. The latter probably not, just on principle.
Interesting! I didn't even know about the drunk comms! Man I learn something new every day on here kek
Yeah, pay attention to our current drunks.
Rumors are that Nancy has always been a drunk.
But it's only recently that it's been ramping up in the public view.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=nancy+pelosi+drunk
They fact-check it, but the comms have to get out somehow.
I am certain they have dirt on her, but I'm 50/50 on if it is White Hats or the Black Hats have something on her.
It's probably the Black Hats that have her on a leash beyond her benefactor's liking.
Yeah, there are factions. The Cabal isn't homogenous. Nancy sells her services to the highest bidder, and, if not White Hats, I think one faction has dirt on her that has locked her into serving them and them alone.
White hats and black hats both have the dirt on Nancy. Whatever motivates her more and the actions she takes will determine who she is at the end of the day.
Q31 - "We all have the goods on everyone else."
Highly plausible theory on Nancy. And I'm leaning towards agreeing with you fren. I knew there was more than one faction to the deep state, and I think it's by design honestly. Plant your agents everywhere and don't tell them where the other agents are. Have them all work independently, but also unknowingly part of a master plan being enacted. Give them all some plausible deniability as well in the face of getting caught. If the freemasons get caught, well that just a finger of the organization, they have 9 other fingers and the rest of the body. (Just using this as an example)
This is a great post, Sleepy. A primer on how the cabal interwove itself into American history. I like how you concisely describe the North/South perspectives as each being half right. Also, it's fascinating how easily the clamor for individual rights, championed by the North, who used that ideal to rightfully claim the Cradle of the American Revolution title, got perverted into federal (over)rule to secure them. I've often thought of the USA's origins being akin to the time of judges in the Bible, with our timeline gradually moving into Kings. Inserting the cabal into the history makes it all click. I suppose we'll have to merge this and somehow make a Europa-style documentary that works the Americas and China into the timeline.
I had this exact revelation about china last night! Told it to a buddy this morning before lunch.
How many know what part Russia played in the civil war?
To this day the globalists cries of Russia Russia Russia stem from the grudging over it.
Russia has always been crippled by its severe winters.
However, that also made Russia an unbeatable foe in kinetic warfare.
It wasn't until Napoleon that the Cabal realized how well off Russia was geographically.
Napoleon's retreat from the harsh Russian winters was his doom.
Same thing for Hitler. Blitzkrieg works well, until the cold sets in.
In that sense, the Cabal noticed what happened to Napoleon and wrote it down.
They used it to destroy Hitler after Germany's usefulness was spent.
WWII's primary goals were to turn the US into the Military arm of the One World Government and to take control of the Vatican/Jesuits. Up until then, the Jesuits, Freemasons, and the Illuminati, all off-shoots of the Rosicrucian Philosophers, were in a trifold power struggle. The Rothschilds finally took control of the Vatican after they used Mussolini and Hitler to open the doors for them.
Don't believe that last bit?
https://qalerts.app/?n=936
Anyway, with the knowledge that Russia's western front is a board-clear come winter time, they started shortly after Napoleon on taking control of it as a very useful asset in mass-extermination of military personnel.
Why kill off armies you ultimately control?
Well, for one, to make sure they don't try to overthrow the government once you tell them you can't afford to pay them.
Problem solved, right?
Bastards...
Anyways, they thought Russia was unbeatable because of geography. That, and they had to make sure they spat in the eye of the Fatima prophecies.
https://sspx.org/en/fatima_consecration_invalid_pope_bishops_russia
Seriously, this Cabal lore is deep. Everything, all major wars, are connected.
I've always wondered about that: Reagan and Pope JP II both asked the world to pray for Russia. It may have outweighed in spirit what the letter of the prophetic instructions spelled out for the Roman Catholic church specifically. At any rate Russia and the world are better off today than before those prayers, and God may have extended mercy to the Western world as a result, regardless of the Roman Catholic establishment.
I nice write up! And thank you for the effort.
I would punch a whole in your approach by using the following reference:
Amendment 14 to the US Constitution did nothing to alleviate indentured servitude, but extended it to all who are citizens of the Washington DC based foreign corporation USA INC.
On a 1040, or any other application, you have to identify yourself with a political affiliation:
no 1 and 2 are definitely fucked.
That means the lot of you, thanks to your birth-certificate sold to the fund shit.
April 15, 1865 - Lincoln Dies
June 8, 1866 - 14th Amendment Passed
July 9, 1868 - 14th Amendment ratified
Yeah, that chronology works out, so I agree with your premise but not that it pokes any holes.
In fact, it only supports the idea that Grant sold us out and might have tried to course-correct at a later time.
Take a look at this quote:
I sense he was repentant and tried to fix what he did by becoming president after Johnson's absolute nightmare of a presidency.
Johnson was President between 1865 and 1868, so he is to blame for the 14th Amendment's legalese trappings.
Honestly, Johnson was such a clusterfuck of an individual I can't help but think he was trying to do good and the globalists shut him down.
Then Grant took over, and under what pretense I have no clue.
All I know is that he seems guilt-ridden and I would bet it had to do with Lincoln's death.
A repentant drunk sounds very convincing indeed and I would not be surprised if indeed he would be implicated in the scheme.
But indeed, you a right, when you consider the idea of passing of the amendment.
Bless your clear historic view!
I understand that amendment was passed over Johnsons veto.
Nice job. It is amazing what we find when we are willing to pick up the shovel and actually dig.
Check out the book: the suppressed truth about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. Multiple downloads free online. Very hard evidence that implicates Rome and it's Jesuits being behind the cause of the war.