Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

73
So I realized that it's possible that the whole controversy of overly thin models for the last two or three decades was purely pedophilic propaganda replicating a child's physique in adults. (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 4 years ago by prophetofnothing 4 years ago by prophetofnothing +73 / -0
45 comments download share
45 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (45)
sorted by:
▲ 14 ▼
– gobby 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

One thing I've thought .. a lot of the decision makers in the women's fashion and modeling world are, ironically, gay men. It seems they love to torture and humiliate the women into keeping these unrealistic shapes. Could it be it's because they are jealous - they hate the women because they can't be women -- so they punish them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– skidder1 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Some women are just born with those shapes. The girl in the middle above could be the twin of my daughter, and she does nothing to look like she does, it's just genetic. However I think your theory may have some merit and it wouldn't surprise me a bit if it was correct.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Crossroads 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Never understood this as the norm. It was dumb. Personally, I prefer more slim to athletic women myself. I feel like I would break someone who was this thin.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Mr.GoodWrench 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

Exactly. Give me a Gina Carano, Gemma Arterton, Haley Atwell type any day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– gobby 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

What a horrible thought, but you may be on to something. Slim and healthy is good, but no boobs or hips definitely makes them look like prepubscent boys.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– NooneFor2024 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

That whole Brazilian wax crap is BS. First of all, why would any woman want to look like a damn child in the nether regions, let alone removing 100% of hair that God put there for a reason? Not saying keeping trimmed up is wrong or anything, but to remove it ALL, making one more susceptible to allowing bacteria to form in the worst of places, especially since damaging the skin and opening follicles through using WAX or even shaving to remove hair.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Junionthepipeline 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

If I wanted to fuck a rug life would cost less

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– sortofsamuel 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

also it's highly possible that some are male.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MathletesFoot 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

I wish dyed hair, (yes, including blond), piercings and tattoos would also go away.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– x-irradiance 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I don’t. It makes it such that you don’t need to wash it as often.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– prophetofnothing [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Why would you think that it makes it so you could wash your hair last?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Casualvagrancy 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Nah. It’s just evolution. Males are attracted to signals of youth, health, and fertility, such as waist-hip ratio.

Fat is a signal of age and disease.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Advhawk 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

F*** that women are beautiful stop making me feel unclean

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MAGAthinker 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

You’re getting warmer. Almost every supermodel is gender inverted, that’s why they have no curves. It’s called Elite Gender Inversion.

It is very real and shocking. The transgender agenda is huge part of the new world order plan. Their “god” is a transgender: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet

Here is a quick photo showing what I am talking about. This is supermodel Gisele Bündchen (Tom Brady’s wife) and “her” twin sister. One is a biological male and the other is a biological female:

https://files.catbox.moe/h5o0fq.jpeg

Most would be absolutely shocked at the number of prominent “females” (celebrities, singers, supermodels, athletes, politicians, business leaders, wives of prominent men, celebrity children) who were born male. Many were likely given female hormones at a young age and had facial feminization surgical procedures. Some have even publicly admitted it in an off-handed or joking manner. There are both FTM and MTF transgenders. Elite Gender Inversion, or EGI, is much deeper than one could ever imagine. It’s done to join “their club.”

This agenda is an all out attack on masculinity, in an effort to feminize males, reduce reproduction and destroy the traditional family unit. They are born into generations of satanic families that practice this to defy God.

For anyone interested, there are many places to deep dive EGI online, including photos and videos.

What is the “secret” about Victoria’s Secret models? Watch these:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/g4vEgpRvveTp/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/XwtjVuEnkP1I/

Here is a very large list of transgendered celebs (with accompanying transvestigation videos) that will surprise you. Once you learn the biological markers, you will see them everywhere.

The Transgender Agenda - Hidden in Plain Sight https://www.scribd.com/document/344558948/The-Transgender-Agenda-Hidden-in-Plain-Sight-April-2017

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– cathole953 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Ya know, now that you've brought it up, it wouldn't surprise me. Personally, I tend to find "healthy" looking women attractive. Ideally fit/athletic, but I mean someone who just looks healthy and normal is a bear minimum for me. I've never been attracted to the literal anorexic looking "models" for the same reason I don't find obese land whales attractive. Both are just turn offs to me.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– prophetofnothing [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I feel like you're the only person who fully understood my post.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– yoohoo 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Sounds like if one doesn't shave, they're seen as a Luddite or a feminazi bra-burner. If one does shave then they're gay or supporting pedos who want them to look more like a child. So which is it? As long as one's not breaking a dress code, shave it or don't shave it, color it or don't color it--it's just hair. I mean, really. What matters is that your heart is right with Him.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– prophetofnothing [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I wasn't really talking about being clean shaven I was definitely referring to like that whole anorexia trend from like the late 90s, I know it didn't really progress beyond 2010 it seems like but it seemed like a huge impactful trend for a while there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– prophetofnothing [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

????

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– prophetofnothing [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Hostile much? Sorry.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– Unreasonable 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Yes and yes

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Anon8675309 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The answer is: models literally live on coffee and coke. The end

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– raver9876 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Hmm, you’re getting closer to the truth…

Now ask yourself why 90% of female genitals are shaved on websites like porn hub.

Besides porn stars, who else has genitals that are hairless?

Whose idea was it to start shaving the genitals of porn stars?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– 8thGenPatriot 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

It's almost understandable with porn stars. Prostitutes have been shaving for thousands of years to minimize the risk of pubic lice, and having no hair makes it easier to do a visual inspection for crazy rashes and sores.

For normal, monogamous couples, those precautions are absolutely unnecessary. It just becomes a matter of personal preference. I have one friend who I give shit because he shaves his armpits, but he swears that without hair to hold the sweat, he needs less deoderant. My wife said I should try, and I humored her. It felt super weird, and no razor has touched me since.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– raver9876 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I’m pretty sure it was the photographers who told the models to start shaving. Before the 70s, there was hair everywhere in most porn. I’m pretty sure it was Penthouse that pushed it first, then Playboy. Explicitness sells magazines.

My question is why did the Playboy company start publishing actual CP in the late 70’s. What part of the Playboy corporation decided it was a good idea, the Playboy financial office, the marketing department or their CIA liaison office?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– RamboToaster 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Imagine having so much control over a society that you attempt to convince it's men that they gotta fuck fat chicks or they are "fatphobic."

It was kinda funny until the fat ass mannequins showed up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– prophetofnothing [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

That was either part of the plan....or not....but it's pretty weird to normalize obesity, I feel you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– hippielouie 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

i've always thought this, especially since waxing became common. has that pre-puberty feel

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DeplorableMimi 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I was thinking along the same lines. The shaving all the hair on your body fad definitely land towards prepubescent years

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ormoths 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I guess Sacha Baron Cohen knew what he was talking about, when commenting about Baywatch (first quote): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im7sZt2gE04

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Kavvfefe 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Yes, emaciated waifs, prepubescent nymphs

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– prophetofnothing [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I didnt mean to walk away from this conversation, had gotten caught up with family.

I am not speaking about all models, but some of you had to notice that there are tons of models that have been skin and bones, looking like little boys with washboard chests and shit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– prophetofnothing [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I think you are missing the whole point of why people are here in this forum.

It's FOR THE CHILDREN.

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy