Thank you IAmOne. The Shroud is not a required belief. I choose to believe it is the cloth that covered Jesus. I believe research was deliberately done wrong. I don't need a physical object to prove Jesus. Faith does that. I think it's valuable to reflect on the image shown to understand the physical horror of crucifixion. It reminds me of that sacrifice for the sins of humanity
Thanks. It's been a favorite topic of mine for years. I look at it from the point of view that a forger wouldn't have necessarily understood how to do the details. Real or not it really shows what absolute agony Jesus went thru...great point to study history of the time..... all to take away our sins. GOD LOVED so much He sent His Son to take the punishment for our sins to repair our (humanities) relationship with Him.
Thank you. When I see that face it makes me think of Jesus. It's really about what God did for all of humanity. I reflect on history of what was happening in the world at that time.
I think he'd be more interested in having his Father's name known (he mentions doing so three times in the unedited versions of John 17,) and the fact references to his Father's name have been erased/edited are disturbing to me.
I'm Christian, but am anti-Trinitarian since it was first inserted in 1520 with the printing of the Complutensian Polyglot. Confusing Jesus with his Father is the result of Jerome's poor translation (he couldn't read Hebrew;) instead of translating the Tetragrammaton into Latin, he translated Elohim and Adonai into God and Lord, respectively. Then, in the "NT" when Jesus is referred to as Lord, people began to infer (incorrectly, no offense) he was also God.
Son of God, my savior, Christ Jesus
Yasuha!
O my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, and lead all souls to Heaven, especially those in most need of Your Mercy. Amen.
Yashua! Do I have my doubts about to shroud
I'm a Christian, and I'm not putting this here to be a jerk. But the shroud hasn't passed critical examination: https://infidels.org/kiosk/article/the-shroud-of-turin-the-great-gothic-art-fraud-because-if-its-real-the-brain-of-jesus-was-the-size-of-a-protohumans/
Also….the shroud is one continuous piece of cloth… The burial was with two pieces of cloth, one for the body and one for the face.
https://www.simplycatholic.com/face-cloth-of-jesus-burial-the-sudarium-of-oviedo/ Here is a nice explanation of the reason for the face cloth or napkin as sometimes called.
Thank you IAmOne. The Shroud is not a required belief. I choose to believe it is the cloth that covered Jesus. I believe research was deliberately done wrong. I don't need a physical object to prove Jesus. Faith does that. I think it's valuable to reflect on the image shown to understand the physical horror of crucifixion. It reminds me of that sacrifice for the sins of humanity
Thanks. It's been a favorite topic of mine for years. I look at it from the point of view that a forger wouldn't have necessarily understood how to do the details. Real or not it really shows what absolute agony Jesus went thru...great point to study history of the time..... all to take away our sins. GOD LOVED so much He sent His Son to take the punishment for our sins to repair our (humanities) relationship with Him.
Good idea.
Thank you. When I see that face it makes me think of Jesus. It's really about what God did for all of humanity. I reflect on history of what was happening in the world at that time.
His looks were unremarkable. He was average.
Thank you for your two cents. And for the comment I appreciate it
Look up Jesus’ comment on proper length hair on a man…that disqualifies it on its own. Or….scripture and therefore God is wrong.
Me too. There are many issues with it. The CC has so many relic pieces of the cross they could build an ark.
My Heavenly Father and savior, Jesus.
If the Shroud is fake, it's a very clever one. No one has figured how it was created.
The great I AM. Lord of all. My friend and companion. My KING
I think he'd be more interested in having his Father's name known (he mentions doing so three times in the unedited versions of John 17,) and the fact references to his Father's name have been erased/edited are disturbing to me.
This is the concept of the Trinity. God the father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit
I'm Christian, but am anti-Trinitarian since it was first inserted in 1520 with the printing of the Complutensian Polyglot. Confusing Jesus with his Father is the result of Jerome's poor translation (he couldn't read Hebrew;) instead of translating the Tetragrammaton into Latin, he translated Elohim and Adonai into God and Lord, respectively. Then, in the "NT" when Jesus is referred to as Lord, people began to infer (incorrectly, no offense) he was also God.
Oh ok. Agree to disagree.
ROFL
Fauci?
Jaucs demolay
Mark, lol
I thought that everyone knew that that's Jacques DeMolay, last Grand Master of the Knights Templar.
First he was tortured in captivity in a mockery of the afflictions of Christ. Crowned, scourged and beaten then nailed crucified to a door.