what if the British Empire was about to collapse?
what if Queen Elizabeth 2 was recently informed of the Imminent collapse of the House of Windsor?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Windsor
probably upon her death.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II
Canada is still part of the British Empire.
Canada is all about "Royal This, and Crown That"
Australia and New Zealand are part of the British Empire too.
and wouldn't you know it, the trucker protest came to each of the capitals of those British Colonies
The City of London, is the financial capital of the world.
It is a capital built upon unsustainable USURY, or interest.
What if USURY was the root of all evil,
and what if the Great Awakening was more about the public waking up the root of all evil, which is usury,
without USURY, they have NOTHING.
without usury, they have no money.
without usury, they have no power.
without usury, they have no medial mouthpieces
without usury, they can't buy politicians
without usury, they can't buy up all the farm land.
without usury, you would be rich, instead of poor.
without usury, you would own, instead of rent.
without usury, there would be no federal income taxes.
without usury, there would be no inflation.
without usury, you wouldn't be a tax slave.
without usury, you wouldn't be a debt slave.
without usury, you wouldn't be a slave.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usury
Full Documentary The Money Masters
3h:30m
C'mon man, don't you want to pay for crack pipes for the less fortunate?!
Where's your humanity?! LOL
Sad truth fellow Patriot...
I left Commiefornia 7yrs ago.
Born and raised in Northern Cali...
Miss my family, loved ones and friends
Extremely grateful I left that shite hole
I believe he means better than what they do now.
Point is there shouldn't be any taxes at all, doesn't matter if they're used for "better programs"
Government should be about 1/10th the size it is now, they should worry singularly with fundamental issues, like (real) infrastructure, legislation, law enforcement, that's it.
Reality is that 99.9% of "social programs" are money laundering scams, most of these "social issues" are created by these fuckers to begin with... in a true free society you wouldn't have not even a fraction of all the trivial social problems we see now, and people would focus on real issues... and then fix them.
Government should self fund with tariffs, royalties on use of natural resources or some such, holding of events, there are so many ways this could work without having to fucking dip into the hard earned income of the people...
Need to fix a road/light-post/fence whatever? get a quote on how much it would cost, then make an announcement on the local community where that road sits, it's on the people living there own interest to contribute and get it done, all the local administration has to do is to assess the costs, find the best contractor, manage the fund raising then oversee the job.
It could be so simple...
I suspect that even 1/10 of the size it is now is far too much for the Federal Government. The Federal Government is only needed to help the States deal with each other. Even the military should be a joint effort between the states. Everything should be a joint effort between the states. That is what the Federal Government should be. In fact I believe the States should fund the Federal Government not the people. There are different ways for the States to fund themselves without taxing the people.
For sure, the federal portion should be the smallest, all they have to do is manage the real macro of it all, since most action happens at the local level.
About everything being a "joint effort" I'm not sure, the more decentralized the better, of course when it comes to the national military force that is a given, and of course you gotta have properly regulated commerce between states/internationally for everything to flow smoothly, but for everything else idk
If I have earned and own something then it is mine to loan out to whoever I choose. If I own my car I can rent it out. If I own a building I can rent it out. Why should renting out money be any different?
Some call it earning interest. Some call it usury.
I call it owning your own stuff. It's capitalism and I should be able to do what I want with my property!
If you borrow money fair and square you pay interest as you agreed to.
Muzzies and commies are against paying interest and call it "usury".
Problem is that a select few get to decide when to create more “money” and who to give it to.
There can be fair terms for lending at interest if what is considered money goes back to god’s standard
Usury is earning money from the poor simply because you have more money than they do. You're profiting off of less fortunate peoples misfortune.
It's immoral.
It is the individual's choice to borrow or not. Sometimes borrowing is wise and sometimes it is not.
Would you punish the wise by preventing them from borrowing when wise to do so?
Would you treat the poor like children who cannot make their own decisions like free men and women?
Exactly.
Without interest, people would not lend money. Without money available to borrow, how many people would own their own home? Granted, they have to pay a mortgage, but they are the beneficiaries of the increased value of the house, and they can pay it off and own the home free and clear. Who has the money to purchase a home for cash? Not many.
Remember what happened in 2007 with the collapse of the real estate market? The Gub'ment mandated that everyone should be able to get a loan. Interest rates were at record lows and people got in way over their head and defaulted on their loans creating an implosion in the RE market as foreclosures took over.
....... because of usury my dude.
Ursury is the middle man that makes everything more expensive, except its for literally everything. Its like School loans making schools more expensive, car dealerships making cars more expensive, insurance companies making health care more expensive. Its the same principal.
The person with the money, if they earned it fair and square, own it just like any other object.
They worked for it.
The people borrowing it did not work for it.
The borrowers owe the people who worked and earned it and loaned it to them in good faith.