The Reason Trump Wrote "Special Counsel Robert Durham"
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (78)
sorted by:
Except election fraud. Barr claimed any notion of election fraud was "nonsense." He's totally OK with a presidential election having been stolen, on his watch as attorney general.
It boggles the imagination.
The Supreme Court was no better. I think the DS was allowed to complete the election theft for very specific reasons. And some, like Barr, were told to let it happen. I'm convinced the Patriots needed the DS to do what they are doing to have rock solid evidence of treason against all the DS players. I suspect that in allowing the DS to finish the theft of the WH, Barr was allowed to finish what he was commanded to do, without the DS taking notice.
And I admit, I could be wrong. Won't keep me from trying to enjoy the show.
Still dying to know which people comprise the original WH planning group from years ago that identified Trump and said, 'we need him' - and is still running this show, worldwide. Ex military? would have to be, wouldn't it? How would there be the international contacts of WH 'deep state' that would trust the US enough to coordinate with that secret, unproven team. This is just mind-boggling when you start to imagine the tentacles, the logistics, the negotiation/convincing required throughout the Plan.
My guess is the Secret Service, working with military intel.
Dunno for sure, but I've always thought it was the good Generals that Obama got rid of early in his term.
We all should admit we could be wrong! Haha
The same reason Trump didn't publicly call in the Military to take over the polls and count legal votes in person in Oct 2020.
The same reason every scrap of the election material wasn't federally seized on November 4th, 2020.
The same reason the Insurrection Act wasn't publicly declared as being active and the Dems rounded up on January 7, 2021.
Doing so would have made every bit of work insubstantial to the people and made the patriots into tyrants in the public eye. Instead, the people are being shown (painfully) exactly who the real tyrants are, and this includes exposing the tyranny that rests just behind the eyes on every mortal which must always be personally kept in check for freedom to prevail.
It's not enough to just "save" the people when they're so brainwashed they'd never understand what you saved them from.
The DS planned a massed depopulation scale (world war 3). They would have carried out their plan if Hillary had won. But good luck ever getting regular people to comprehend such an evil. Most live in the delusion that their government would never actively harm the economy for power. When you try to tell someone that the plandemic was orchestrated they just say "But that would hurt the economy. Politicians wouldn't want to hurt their tax base".
They really believe that. They think somehow that hurting small business bothers politicans and CEOs.
Regular people have a mental block when it comes to real evil. They can't understand the mind of people who do anything for power even if it hurts their own interests.
What good is saving the people for one decade? If they don't learn the evil will crawl back in and do the same. Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for life.
Save the people for a decade or teach the people to save themselves? I think the military already saved us and removed the head. The body is what we're fighting, but this is something the people need to stand up and do for themselves. If we don't learn our lesson, this will just happen again. That means people need to get their head out of the sand and see the evil right in front of him.
Yes, there are people who will do anything for power. And they want absolute power. They want control of your body, mind, and spirit.
The end of the matrix reflects this exactly, unwittingly or not.
I don't know what side Barr is on but I do not remember him saying there was no election fraud. I do remember him saying that no proof of election fraud was shown to him (by the people under him).
That is not the same as saying there was no election fraud.
My thought at the time was this. He was confirming that the Justice dept. was completely corrupt.
He did not state his opinion on the election. He only stated the facts that the Justice dept. provided him.
He dismissed it as "nonsense". That is the same as saying there was no election fraud.