I think they might actually be telling the truth on this one. Who actually still reads their deep state propaganda woke snowflake normies? They'll melt. ....
I can write about Russia collusion with Trump for 3 years, but they just wouldn't understand Russia collusion by Hillary to frame Trump. Much too complex.
Also "I can't figure out how to spin the new information to paint Trump in a bad light and to make Hillary look innocent.
No one is capable of writing stupid enough for your readers to understand.
No, because it’s not your narrative
Ha. The Gray Lady is dead. Kaput, Fini, bereft of life. They suicided rather than do actual journalism.
may this story should be covered by..............Reader's Digest!
CARLOS!
Haha... because they lied to their readers, their readers would have difficulty digesting the truth.
I think they might actually be telling the truth on this one. Who actually still reads their deep state propaganda woke snowflake normies? They'll melt. ....
In their defense, NY Times readers are pretty dumb.
Everyone with a subscription should cancel it on that one.
Simple: Russia, Russia, Russia was brought to you by Hillary, Hillary, Hillary…and crew!
I can write about Russia collusion with Trump for 3 years, but they just wouldn't understand Russia collusion by Hillary to frame Trump. Much too complex.
Also "I can't figure out how to spin the new information to paint Trump in a bad light and to make Hillary look innocent.
This only means they know how to read as apposed to "It has to be true because I saw it on tell-a-vision."
Reddit can only handle TLDR's