68,000% Increase in Strokes as FDA and NIH Secretly Study Reports of Neurological Injuries After COVID-19 Vaccines. The COVID-19 experimental vaccines, which were given emergency use authorization illegally, should have been immediately pulled from the market at least a year ago.
(vaccineimpact.com)
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
Comments (24)
sorted by:
"I searched VAERS for all symptoms containing “stroke” following COVID-19 vaccines, and it returned a result of 2,783 cases. (Source.)
By way of comparison, for the previous 30+ years starting in 1990 when VAERS was established, using the exact same search for every symptom containing “stroke,” we get a result of only 104 cases for ALL FDA-approved vaccines for the past 30+ years combined. (Source.)
The yearly averages then look like this:
2385 cases of stroke per year following COVID-19 vaccines
3.5 cases of stroke per year following all FDA-approved vaccines combined"
Wow. That's crazy
Great (and horrifying) catch!
This needs a sticky.
I would be nice to have a permanent sticky updating mortality and morbidity.
GREAT idea.
Stop the Vaccine Death Shots Worldwide Now!
We know there was ZERO Medical Oversite.
My normie conservative sister (she listens to Ben Shapiro daily) calls the vaccines "sugar shots" because they don't seem to do anything. Bullcrap.
Yet, the vaxxes are still being pushed. I mute commercials for them all the time.
They are always in between two other medications which half the commercial explains potential adverse reactions, what are they doing in the covid vaccine commercials?
Acting like you're a better parent if you get your child vaxxed. You're helping yourself and others if you get vaxxed. Same old bullshit
Sadly many of us said this over 1 1/2 years ago. The FDA can claim all they want that Pfizer misled them, but that does not negate: 1). Our government owns a fair share of the Moderna vaccine (conflict of interest to promote the Moderna vaccine) and 2) The FDA as the supposed government agency to protect us from dangerous drugs and equipment bears the responsibility in investigating and researching everything they give their approval on, not just rubber stamping and believing what they are told. Why is it the lay citizens knew the vaccine should be stopped and not mandated two years ago when VAERS started showing more injuries and deaths in a short period of time than all vaccines in 20 years? It did not take a rocket scientist to know the Covid shot must be stopped and withdrawn not mandated by big businesses, medical facilities, government offices and the military. This should never have been mandated because it was still EUA-although Moderna and Pfizer tried to pull a bait and switch with the FDA approved shots in Europe and due to the number of deaths and injuries.
And This is why it’s important for a control group database
This is exactly how NOT to do science. VAERS is a total horror show of a database. It's incomplete. Reporting is not mandatory or standardized in anyway. Both medical professionals and the general public can submit claims. There's little to no verification of claims. And a long litany of studies have shown it's only capturing a tiny fraction of overall data.
It cannot be used to infer the incidence of disease at all.
Let me say that again because that's the entirety of what this article does. You cannot use VAERS data to infer the incidence of any side effect because the data are wholly insufficient.
If you want to calculate incidence of a disease, there's a process to do it in a validated way. This isn't it. While I have no doubt that the vaccines are causing something, we cannot know how much from this data set.
While VAERS may be insufficient for a fully vetted professional conclusion, I see it as a significant piece of data considering people would be less inclined to register incidents this past year compared to 30y+ (whether it be due to work overload or political pressure to protect the narrative) and even then results in a huge gap as demonstrated by babskek's comment.
Fascinating how people dismiss VAERS, when it's literally the ONLY vaccine safety system established in the US.
If you ignore VAERS, what then are you using to establish vaccine safety signals?
It's certainly not perfect, but ignore it at your own peril.
Experts! We should only listen to Experts!
#TrustFauci /s
While there are some inefficiencies, it is illegal to make a false or knowingly inaccurate submission in VAERS. While some pieces may be incomplete, it has been the gold standard for tracking vaccine side-effects up until the Covid vaccine. So I guess all of the other data we've been relying on for the previous 30 years is also unreliable? I think that once the general public caught wind of VAERS and used it as evidence that something was awry with the jab, the medical industrial complex did everything they could to demean the system in order to discourage vaccine hesitancy, even though it has been the go-to for most, if not all vaccines for decades.
Then use the ONS vaccine injury data which is validated? Interesting the VAERS data corresponds to ONS vaccine injury data.
I’m feeling pretty dumb for not knowing about the ONS database. Can you point me ?