Pfizer vaccine data. Of particular interest is page 30: full pages of known adverse effects…
(twitter.com)
💉VACCINE DATA RELEASE 💉
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (209)
sorted by:
Page 30 lists adverse events reported to the database. Adverse events are not established as proven vaccine injuries, just events that occurred in some period after a vaccination. This is the same as VAERS.
See page 5-6.
You cannot look at a list of adverse events reported spontaneously to the database and empirically deduce that each adverse event correlates directly to a confirmed vaccine injury.
You can make assumptions, but so can I, and that is not empirical.
Please quote the part of the report that confirms the assertion you made. So far, I can only see you relying on an assumption of how this data must correlate with vaccine injury, and refusing to demonstrate any empirical basis for that assumption by claiming that you’re just way smarter than me.
Perhaps you are. But for the benefit of your peers, who tend to hate fake researchers who make up bullshit to fit their narrative and lord their intelligence over everyone when questioned, can you lay out the mathematical basis of these assumptions?
I can understand where you are coming from, but I would like to make a broader point about truth communities like ours.
The broad goal here is NOT to prove beyond reasonable doubt to every single person that what we claim is true. Thats beyond the scope of any human being.
The broad goal is to provide enough information to make people ask themselves "am I perhaps being lied to?". This question needs to come from each person, because only when they reach this point will they actually open their minds to the truth.
You haven't reached that point, unfortunately. Hopefully you will, in the days/weeks to come.
Frigging sidebar material right there!
Many people faint after being around needles. I can't base any sort of assumption merely on seeing evidence of people falling down after being sticked with a needle. It happens literally every day in every doctor's office around the world.
So yeah, that wouldn't really cut it.
It's not "being afraid of needles" causing all this.
You asked how I explain a video of someone falling over after getting the vaccine. Would you like to show me that video?
Will I be able to see empirical proof from it that it shows a legitimate COVID vaccination? That the individual has no fear of needles? That the person has no underlying health condition that could cause syncope or some sort of vasovagal reaction?
An abundance of borderline, maybe-maybe-not evidence does not an empirical proof make.
Define Vaccine Injury in Relationship to Adverse Events? Is death an injury or is it considered an Adverse Event?
Yes.
https://www.fda.gov/safety/reporting-serious-problems-fda/what-serious-adverse-event
Be careful here, though. "Associated" does NOT mean "caused by" or even "significantly related to." It means, "there is some relationship between a thing happening and another thing happening."
In VAERS, for instance, that means, "a vaccine was administered, and then a bad thing happened."
That's the association. That adverse event could be that you develop cancer, or die, or that your fingernails get darker, or penis falls off.
The adverse event can be caused by ANYTHING, but has to happen after the vaccine. That's the association. Once that association is established, we can then try to verify whether or not the vaccine actually DID cause that adverse event, or if the adverse event was due to something else.
VAERS does not do that. VAERS is a database of reported adverse events, not confirmed vaccine injuries.
You use VAERS data to figure out where you look for potential vaccine injuries.
Again, there is no such usage of vaccine injury in clinical trials. It falls under Adverse Events. Injury is to subjective, hair loss for a drug to some people is acceptable, but considered an injury to others. Clinical Trials use placebo to help rule out Adverse Events that may not be associated with medications, which in turn are used to compare VAERS data.
Look, I'm not exactly sure what point you're making, because I don't disagree with the notion that the vaccine injury is an adverse event. I know. Of course it is.
What I'm saying is that VAERS ONLY takes data on adverse events.
An adverse event might be caused by a vaccine injury. Or a bad meal. Or cancer. Or a new medication. Or a grumpy mood. But as long as it happened after the vaccine was taken, VAERS will report that data.
Because VAERS reports only adverse events. It does not tell you which of those are vaccine injuries and which are due to other things. It does not tell you that ANY of those reports are vaccine injuries.
I'll just let VAERS itself explain. It has a "how to interpret this data" guide that I think is helpful to read.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Im sorry you took the death serum. I hope you survive your ignorance. Ill pray you find peace in the next realm.
I appreciate that and also hope I survive it. I’m just not as worried about it as you are, but that does make your words more meaningful. Thank you.
"A prison... for your mind."
I feel your pain fren.
"What we've got here, is failure to communicate."
Stupid is as stupid does.
I feel like this every damn day trying to put my history and government degrees to work. I reference the relevance of the Crimean War to what's going on right now, and retards say "oh yeah when Putin invaded in 2014 that was bad." Ummm no, like the actual Crimean War, you know, in the 1850s... :blank stares: ... "Oh like with Robert E Lee?"
Retards everywhere. It's truly mind numbing