Luciferase literally means an enzyme that brings light. That's precisely what it does. It's the enzyme that produces bioluminescence. Pull your head out of your pastor's backside long enough to realize this is just a Latin word applied to name something, as is done quite ubiquitously in change. And nowhere in this paper does it suggest that Luciferase is an ingredient in the BT162b2 (Pfizer's Comirnaty) vaccine. Nowhere.
Hell, the Bible even gets Lucifer as a symbol wrong. You're worried about the "adversary" of good. You're worried about the Satan (means "adversary"). Focus on that. Don't get fixated on a name and a symbol that clearly is totally antagonistic to what you think it means.
Back on topic, if you don't understand what this means, you probably shouldn't be opining at all because you don't even understand the objective of the work and the experimental design, let alone the results:
In this study, the GMP-ready formulation containing the amino-lipid ALC-0315 and the PEG-lipid ALC-0159 (in this report referred to as LNP 8 which is the identical composition as used in BNT162) was tested in comparison with a by Acuitas, and an in-house formulation, to characterize the biodistribution of luciferase expressed by LNP-formulated nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA). Activation of the innate immune system, formation of antibodies against luciferase, and T-cell activation were also assessed.
This stuff is highly specialized biochemical research. I've got a Biochemistry degree. I'm quite familiar with luciferase as a molecular marker in experiments, and this still takes some time to pick through and figure out what they're doing. But I can assure you, it's not Satan worship. Stop with the fact-absent nonsense. Down vote away and call me a shill. I've been called worse.
It wasn't his name until the middle ages and there's no resemblance (other than vaguely meaning the same "lightbringer" motif) to the original biblical name of the devil in Hebrew.
If you're going to be strict about names in the Bible you should probably be using the original ones, not the English versions that the editors of the KJV decided to use in the 1600s.
Luciferase + Biometric Luminescence for Experimental Purposes, being injected into any victim, I would say is quite Satanic imo. Tracking / Monitoring / Being Able to Visibly Recognize Order Followers on a Whim...? Not good stuff. Sounds pretty damn evil to me. And extremely coincidental that this substance is being used in such a horrendous manner. Too bad I don't believe in coincidences.
Wow, do you always get so worked up over a throw-away comment or a passing thought or anything else so minor? My comment wasn't any deeper than if I'd said, "check it out, it's raining on my side of the street but not the other, isn't that weird?" And yet you act like I'd said, "you dumb mother fucker, rain comes from cumulus clouds, pull your head out of your ass!". I don't know why I'm even taking the 2 minutes I am taking to respond anyway. What an absolutely absurd freakout over absolutely nothing.
Luciferase literally means an enzyme that brings light. That's precisely what it does. It's the enzyme that produces bioluminescence. Pull your head out of your pastor's backside long enough to realize this is just a Latin word applied to name something, as is done quite ubiquitously in change. And nowhere in this paper does it suggest that Luciferase is an ingredient in the BT162b2 (Pfizer's Comirnaty) vaccine. Nowhere.
Hell, the Bible even gets Lucifer as a symbol wrong. You're worried about the "adversary" of good. You're worried about the Satan (means "adversary"). Focus on that. Don't get fixated on a name and a symbol that clearly is totally antagonistic to what you think it means.
Back on topic, if you don't understand what this means, you probably shouldn't be opining at all because you don't even understand the objective of the work and the experimental design, let alone the results:
This stuff is highly specialized biochemical research. I've got a Biochemistry degree. I'm quite familiar with luciferase as a molecular marker in experiments, and this still takes some time to pick through and figure out what they're doing. But I can assure you, it's not Satan worship. Stop with the fact-absent nonsense. Down vote away and call me a shill. I've been called worse.
Lucifer is ACTUALLY HIS NAME! No amount words, paragraphs, raging or shilling (yeah I went there) will ever change that fact. "."
Isaiah 14:12-14
It wasn't his name until the middle ages and there's no resemblance (other than vaguely meaning the same "lightbringer" motif) to the original biblical name of the devil in Hebrew.
If you're going to be strict about names in the Bible you should probably be using the original ones, not the English versions that the editors of the KJV decided to use in the 1600s.
Found the occultist ^
You literally just said “what the Bible gets wrong”….
The Bible gets nothing wrong my friend. Recognize that before it’s too late for you.
Luciferase + Biometric Luminescence for Experimental Purposes, being injected into any victim, I would say is quite Satanic imo. Tracking / Monitoring / Being Able to Visibly Recognize Order Followers on a Whim...? Not good stuff. Sounds pretty damn evil to me. And extremely coincidental that this substance is being used in such a horrendous manner. Too bad I don't believe in coincidences.
u/#lightning
Jesus Christ.
Wow, do you always get so worked up over a throw-away comment or a passing thought or anything else so minor? My comment wasn't any deeper than if I'd said, "check it out, it's raining on my side of the street but not the other, isn't that weird?" And yet you act like I'd said, "you dumb mother fucker, rain comes from cumulus clouds, pull your head out of your ass!". I don't know why I'm even taking the 2 minutes I am taking to respond anyway. What an absolutely absurd freakout over absolutely nothing.