Because it's a period piece. Snow White wasn't even created as a children's movie, it was a demo for technicolor and also testing if full length animation features could be successful
Remaking Snow White to make her 30 or make him 16 is as cucked as turning white superheroes black or making straight characters lesbians for woke points
You lost your argument as soon as you made it a personal attack. That is the sign of an immature person, who cannot debate the topic, and makes a desperate attempt to distract from their lack of intellect horsepower; by attacking their opponent
Quit listening to the voices in your head. Up the meds
I never commented either way about your topic. I just pointed out your immaturity. I am sorry you are an intellectual midget, who cannot grasp the difference
So, smart people can stoop to your level too. It’s very, very easy. Perhaps that’s why it’s your first response
Marriage median age was 21 in 1930s, 13% of brides were 15-19. Median age for child birth was the same, so 1 out of 10 girls were getting married 15-19, and 1 out of 10 girls were having kids at the same age.
What's the end goal though? What did 1930s Walt Disney get out of making her 14? This isn't like Dan Schneider with Nickelodeon shows, where it's obvious child abuse. it was an animated motion picture marketed to adults
By 1920, all US states except Georgia had age of consent laws at 16 years old or over. Those age of consent laws were targeted for people like men who were twice or more the age of girl.
Snow White was made in 1937. Also this is an animated motion picture that's targeted to adults AND children at the time but now it is all for children. Don't bullshit me that Disney made Snow White 14 and the Prince 31 just to appease adults. Its an extremely flawed argument.
I think you made an excellent argument and am not deterred to say so because you didn't use nice words. I appreciate your insight. I am curious if this is common knowledge? I have never heard this before. It's eye opening for sure.
Because it's a period piece. Snow White wasn't even created as a children's movie, it was a demo for technicolor and also testing if full length animation features could be successful
Remaking Snow White to make her 30 or make him 16 is as cucked as turning white superheroes black or making straight characters lesbians for woke points
You lost your argument as soon as you made it a personal attack. That is the sign of an immature person, who cannot debate the topic, and makes a desperate attempt to distract from their lack of intellect horsepower; by attacking their opponent
Grow up
Name doesn't check out !
Mommy is calling
Quit listening to the voices in your head. Up the meds
I never commented either way about your topic. I just pointed out your immaturity. I am sorry you are an intellectual midget, who cannot grasp the difference
So, smart people can stoop to your level too. It’s very, very easy. Perhaps that’s why it’s your first response
Marriage median age was 21 in 1930s, 13% of brides were 15-19. Median age for child birth was the same, so 1 out of 10 girls were getting married 15-19, and 1 out of 10 girls were having kids at the same age.
What's the end goal though? What did 1930s Walt Disney get out of making her 14? This isn't like Dan Schneider with Nickelodeon shows, where it's obvious child abuse. it was an animated motion picture marketed to adults
By 1920, all US states except Georgia had age of consent laws at 16 years old or over. Those age of consent laws were targeted for people like men who were twice or more the age of girl.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_the_United_States
Snow White was made in 1937. Also this is an animated motion picture that's targeted to adults AND children at the time but now it is all for children. Don't bullshit me that Disney made Snow White 14 and the Prince 31 just to appease adults. Its an extremely flawed argument.
I think you made an excellent argument and am not deterred to say so because you didn't use nice words. I appreciate your insight. I am curious if this is common knowledge? I have never heard this before. It's eye opening for sure.
Yeah you don't really win this argument acting like that.