https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/

From the last sentence of the Discussion portion:

Ivermectin is likely to be an equitable, acceptable, and feasible global intervention against COVID-19. Health professionals should strongly consider its use, in both treatment and prophylaxis.

It is up to them to refute the data presented with other scientific data, not their opinion. Make sure they know that nothing else will be suitable for further conversation on the topic.

Be sure to include a link to this : https://www.niaid.nih.gov/about/director

You're welcome.

There is not one unbiased study that will change a biased mind.

Tell him to come up with unbiased research that proves it doesn't work.

Would something on this page be helpful? https://ivmmeta.com/

https://youtu.be/rfyOihhAD4A

Dr. John Campbell reviews two studies demonstrating that Ivermectin works. One compares it to Remdesivir. The other study was most of the population of a city who were offered Ivermectin as a prophylactic. Both studies were pretty conclusive and the group sizes were large enough that the results weren't accidental.

Note that I have not dug deeply into the studies to try to tease out any biases. I've been convinced that Ivermectin is effective since last summer. You and your adversary will have to determine whether these studies meet his criteria.

Here's a bonus video talking about the history of Ivermectin. I love this one for sharing with doubters because it talks about the problems and conflicts of interest with Remdesivir.

https://rumble.com/vlzihf-the-story-of-ivermectin-and-covid-19.html

Good luck!

I wouldn’t bother trying to convince them, they already made up their mind.

Also, people who say “then we can continue this conversation “ also probably say things like the trucker convoys are “unacceptable”

They need to define "unbiased" first. List the acceptable sources so you don't waste your time.

Have him prove to you that covid exist.

https://greatawakening.win/p/140cWvu33U/ivermectin-treatment-for-covid-i/c/

Edit: if this person you’re engaging with is a covidiot, then no amount of evidence will convince them about ivermectin. Sometimes the sheep are brainwashed to a certain point, you cannot undo the damage.

Biased? Unbiased? Which direction? A request like that is designed to dismiss any/ every answer.

Here is results from a rather large trial The Media is Silent But the Data Speaks: How Ivermectin, Not Vaccines, Saved India's Largest State from Covid-19 https://rescue.substack.com/p/the-media-is-silent-but-the-data?s=r

Lists of studies related to covid.

151 ivermectin COVID-19 studies, 103 peer reviewed, 81 comparing treatment and control groups. Recently added:Lawrie Soto Efimenko Thairu Lim. Ivermectin has been officially adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (39 including non-government medical organizations).

https://c19ivermectin.com

https://c19hcq.com

https://c19vitamind.com

https://c19early.com

It won't matter what info and sources you provide. The OP will just claim it's "biased."

I know there are many studies.. but is there one in particular that is VERY clear that it was unbiased and proof that it cures?

Post the follow up if they post one. I have a feeling they will just stop responding due to the factual evidence that corrupts their reality.

Treatment with Ivermectin Is Associated with Decreased Mortality in COVID-19 Patients https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221009887)

unbiased study

You're wasting your time, they will just dismiss every thing you show them.