New Special Counsel Durham filing
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
Witness-1 = James Baker
Employer-1 = Twitter
These F'ing morons are so bloody used to their criminal ways, they dont even realise the gross violation of the things they do.
James Baker, from RussiaGate infamy who got fired as General Counsel of FBI, went on to become Deputy General Counsel of Twitter.
Sussman with all his connections to Clinton and the rest of the thugs, also works for Twitter and specifically works with James Baker, while at the time he has to testify about things that happened in FBI under the very same James Baker.
This thing is just laughable.
Sauce: https://nypost.com/2020/06/16/twitter-hires-former-fbi-chief-counsel-as-deputy-lawyer/
I think they realize, but do not expect any consequences for their criminal/commie actions.
There were never any consequences before. MAGA wave needed this fall!
Neither side rinos or democommies have had any consequences for a long time. The fall you talk about is consequences for us, patriots, we voted the "right" way and America has probably been voting the "right" way for a long time--but the elections have been fixed. Maybe even the Trump win was fixed so we could see what America can be before the fall.
I'm an idiot I guess. What's criminal about working for Twatter?
Working at twatter is not the crime - it's the payoff for committing the crime. The criminal part happened when Baker was with the FBI and Sussman was feeding him false information to frame Trump (all based on the deboinked "Steele Dossier", paid for by the Hildabeast) - Twatter jobs are the soft landing spot after they were forced out of their previous positions - that also could lead to twatter being implicated as being in on the plan to frame PDJT.
You probably appreciate this, but for the sake of discussion, there are likely many such landing spots. Book deals, academic appointments, correspondent jobs at media companies, work at prestigious law firms, a lot of "consultant" work where you don't really even have to define what you're doing while you sell your connections to the good ole boy network, etc.
If you scratch their back, they'll see you're taken care of. Kind of like watching The Godfather.
Ooh -- get Zuckerbot, too!
Him and his ballot laundering, or whatever you call it.
AND the governors who were involved.
I was thinking them working at Twitter was about, essentially Deep State control. I see the payoff part now that you mention it, lol kind of obvious, but I was thinking it was about controlling Twitter.
What do you think about the part to help to control of Twitter possibility? Bit of a mix or more Payoff, etc.
I like how you think!
would be tough to prove, unless they were hiring these clowns as something they clearly are not (computer scientists or whatever)
I say work where you can and want to, but don't fall for the brainwashing and indoctrination. Maybe more people will see things the way you/we do.
These conflict of interest filings are there for our benefit. He is telling us a story without telling the story. The filing by itself will not do much but paves way for further things down the line.
Q often said they were stupid.
I figured there were 2 reasons - 1 because they did to some stupid things - 2 Mainly to inspire panic and push them towards more stupid things.
But maybe Q was just suggesting they keep doing what they've always done.
Michael Sussmann works at Twitter? This is the first time I'm hearing of this. Do you have a source on this?
Thanks for your kind words, fren.