If you consider any news source to be a 10, then you are not making allowance for controlled oppositions.

Personally, I would suggest not considering any source to be accurate and always judge each news by digging around a bit.

Greatawakening.win

11

I am looking for correlations between alternative sources (tgw, t.me, etc) and also between voluntary omissions (🇨🇭Teletext, AFP, Reuters)…

For example, Russia presenting bio weapon evidence in the UN last week never got mentioned in the mainstream… also, the numerous antivax riots which I witnessed first hand were ignored.

I dip in to UKColumn every so often. Obviously, it has a UK bias but COVID-19 and Ukraine news is relevant everywhere and the US often gets a mention.

It covers lots of stuff that the regular MSM shies away from. Their podcasts lack a little on the presentation side but they make up for it with content - which is actually the more important part.

Please keep this in mind, There is no trusted source. Everyone and everywhere has an egenda. There is fake news from both sides. it's done to muddy the waters. This is information warfare. Verify everything yourself.

The Liberty Daily is a good aggregate from many sources

I’ve been enjoying “victory channel news”. They openly retract statements if it turns out to be fake news. They require all stories to be verified by two separate sources prior to running. I like how transparent they are with that process and that is it on a Christian network. I would rate them a 7. Them and x 22 report are my go to sources.

I made This Thread some time ago. Hope it helps. WWG1WGA

I like Rantingly. It's set up like Drudge was, back in the day

Whatfinger.com news aggregator like drudge used to be only a lot more of it. You always find a few items nobody else touches...