If you're triple jabbed, you're either a karen, leftist insane shitlib, or down right stupid. After all this time, I don't give a fuck anymore. You get what you pay for.
I have a problem with these "studies" when they try to compare the total number of cases among vaxxed and unvaxxed. It should be presented as a percentage of the population in each group. For example, if 100 people out of 1000 vaxxed get covid, that's 10% of the group. If 1 out of 10 unvaxxed get covid, that's 10%. But if only the numbers are used to compared, it would seem like the vaxxed are 100 times more likely to be infected. Because there are far more vaxxed people (if we believe their stats), it will usually seem like the risk of getting infected, or hospitalized, or dying, from covid is higher for the vaxxed group, if only the total numbers are used.
It's a "valid observation" that kinda throws water on the entire article, wouldn't you say?
The article compares values without taking into account percentages of the population that are vaxxed vs unvaxxed. Never mind the fact that it's mostly the young and healthy who are unvaccinated.. these kinds of clickbait articles have been going around for a while.
Exactly what happened to the test animals when exposed to a new virus, and that was if they didn't die of organ failure first.
Truth....
Finally some good news. However, until people begin to drop, it won't matter. These animals have to see it to believe it.
You would find it good news that 217 million people in the US, 4.5 billion worldwide have aids?
Edit: 96 million have had the booster shot in the US, ie triple vaccinateded. The above numbers were just for double vaccinated.
If you're triple jabbed, you're either a karen, leftist insane shitlib, or down right stupid. After all this time, I don't give a fuck anymore. You get what you pay for.
Well that has to be fake if it's from the Official Canadian Govt. They are commie now.
I have a problem with these "studies" when they try to compare the total number of cases among vaxxed and unvaxxed. It should be presented as a percentage of the population in each group. For example, if 100 people out of 1000 vaxxed get covid, that's 10% of the group. If 1 out of 10 unvaxxed get covid, that's 10%. But if only the numbers are used to compared, it would seem like the vaxxed are 100 times more likely to be infected. Because there are far more vaxxed people (if we believe their stats), it will usually seem like the risk of getting infected, or hospitalized, or dying, from covid is higher for the vaxxed group, if only the total numbers are used.
Valid observation....
It's a "valid observation" that kinda throws water on the entire article, wouldn't you say?
The article compares values without taking into account percentages of the population that are vaxxed vs unvaxxed. Never mind the fact that it's mostly the young and healthy who are unvaccinated.. these kinds of clickbait articles have been going around for a while.
Shocking /s 😳
Well, that sucks.
Everything we've been saying since the vaxxes got rolled out. I think the next 6 months or so are going to be horrifying.
Noice.
...is that a hybrid meaning "nice noise"
...or just a regional inflection?
...just asking for a friend...
...doggy winks....
...doggy winks....