3
dangerb407 3 points ago +3 / -0

sorry for your loss; highly doubtful after "months." Millions would be dropping dead. Not disputing potential longer term effects

1
dangerb407 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which stocks? No offense, but if you were pushing Gamestock and DJT he was probably right to ignore you.

2
dangerb407 2 points ago +2 / -0

I suspect as much. My county tends to lean blue so I'm curious as to why the changes weren't statewide

2
dangerb407 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have no idea what any of this is supposed to mean.. Many live paycheck to paycheck if they have families

1
dangerb407 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't understand the headline; 70s divorce kids would generally be late 40s to mid 60s depending upon how old they were when their parents divorced

1
dangerb407 1 point ago +1 / -0

no sauce. If an announced buyback is completed how would that impact a stock price where that has already been priced in?

2
dangerb407 2 points ago +2 / -0

A tad bit ironic (and hypocritical) I must say. The Americans there are probably at least net contributors to the local economies

4
dangerb407 4 points ago +4 / -0

why is this stickied? Where is the sauce? Hope you are somehow right

1
dangerb407 1 point ago +1 / -0

what da fuk is this thread and what does it have to do with Q?

3
dangerb407 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yet your fellow countrymen keep voting in the same candidates who are responsible for you high taxes

view more: Next ›