If a Senator asked her to denounce pedophilia, do you think she would be able to? Or would she hem and haw and give a non-answer?
Is there a way for a Senator to phrase this as a question that wouldn’t seem too offensive? In a way where she would have to answer and reveal herself? “Denounce pedophilia” is probably too easy for her, but what about trying to get her to call pedophilia a criminal act? Would she be able to?
The only problem I have with the death penalty is how often we've put someone to death or almost done so, only to find compelling evidence later that it wasn't the person convicted. Honest to God, it's the only argument that's worth a shit, but it's the only one needed...
Another argument against the death penalty is that somebody has to kill the person and live with doing that. I'm sure killing people in cold blood is not good for the soul, whoever it is.
I think I am for the death penalty on balance. Those people have earned it and they would otherwise take up time and effort. Imagine having to slaughter an animal to feed a human as horrible as as no name for example. The animal's life is worth so much more than his.
Those people have earned it and they would otherwise take up time and effort.
The problem is if you can't really take back execution if you're wrong. You put someone in prison, you can reimburse them for their time. You fine somebody, you can give the money back.
Seriously. We are watching a movie. I like where is headed. Exposure of these evil cretins.
AAAAAAAAAAMEN fren
I like the way you think!
Ya but some normies have no clue hearings are being held for a new SC justice
Shouldn't be near any court, OR CHILDREN...
Georgetown Day School, Where Judge Jackson Is A Board Member, Had 2nd Graders Repeatedly Organize "Gender-neutral Toy Stores" To Push Leftist Lessons About Gender Identity…
https://qagg.news/siteimages/postimage4908.jpg
https://qagg.news/siteimages/postimage4566.jpg
I totally agree. I am for the death penalty!
If a Senator asked her to denounce pedophilia, do you think she would be able to? Or would she hem and haw and give a non-answer?
Is there a way for a Senator to phrase this as a question that wouldn’t seem too offensive? In a way where she would have to answer and reveal herself? “Denounce pedophilia” is probably too easy for her, but what about trying to get her to call pedophilia a criminal act? Would she be able to?
The only problem I have with the death penalty is how often we've put someone to death or almost done so, only to find compelling evidence later that it wasn't the person convicted. Honest to God, it's the only argument that's worth a shit, but it's the only one needed...
Edit: speaking broadly here, not just on pedos
Another argument against the death penalty is that somebody has to kill the person and live with doing that. I'm sure killing people in cold blood is not good for the soul, whoever it is.
I think I am for the death penalty on balance. Those people have earned it and they would otherwise take up time and effort. Imagine having to slaughter an animal to feed a human as horrible as as no name for example. The animal's life is worth so much more than his.
The problem is if you can't really take back execution if you're wrong. You put someone in prison, you can reimburse them for their time. You fine somebody, you can give the money back.
Yes, this is true.