These theories are just so fucking stupid. In that case why doesn't the Deep State clone Trump and record his clone saying the N word or raping little kids in order to try and destroy him? Stop with this cloning nonsense.
They could do that anyway without cloning and they haven’t done it so your question is still relevant. Why didn’t they just fake an audio tape with a Trump impersonator? What do you think? It’s weird that they tried all these other things, but not this.
Fantasyland. The truth is never "extravagant." If anything needs readjustment, it is our own prejudice. I've seen it too many times: "In order to overcome my prejudice, you need to provide extra-special proof...and I get to decide what constitutes proof." No. When the evidence is at par with the previous consensus, then both must be put on the table. Past belief doesn't count. (Remember phlogiston?)
This claim justifies a shotgun spread approach to endless hysteria loops of worthless nonsense. Stay focused, and heavily sourced by more than a Reddit thread or social media personality. I’m personally tired of the epidemic within the truther community of everyone believing anything is possible. We derail quickly with this mentality. Albeit, many possibilities exist, there’s just not enough sourced material to run with. Q explained early on that we have more than we know with all the open source evidence…let’s steer clear of the Corsi types and fun theories and focus.
For instance, we know very little about Rachel Chandler (who was dropped multiple times on posts) yet, if coincidences don’t exist then connecting the dots is very possible.
These theories are just so fucking stupid. In that case why doesn't the Deep State clone Trump and record his clone saying the N word or raping little kids in order to try and destroy him? Stop with this cloning nonsense.
Aside from the first sentence, I really like this comment.
Personally, I always try to be like the best teachers I've had in my life - none of whom would start a lesson by calling me "fucking stupid".
in fairness he did say the THEORIES are stupid, not the person.
They could do that anyway without cloning and they haven’t done it so your question is still relevant. Why didn’t they just fake an audio tape with a Trump impersonator? What do you think? It’s weird that they tried all these other things, but not this.
It's not nonsense and has been done in many cases. Celebrities look a bit different, behave a bit different, etc.
To be a true Anon, one must be open to everything. Remember the mantra of science: Extravagant claims require extravagant proof.
Fantasyland. The truth is never "extravagant." If anything needs readjustment, it is our own prejudice. I've seen it too many times: "In order to overcome my prejudice, you need to provide extra-special proof...and I get to decide what constitutes proof." No. When the evidence is at par with the previous consensus, then both must be put on the table. Past belief doesn't count. (Remember phlogiston?)
This claim justifies a shotgun spread approach to endless hysteria loops of worthless nonsense. Stay focused, and heavily sourced by more than a Reddit thread or social media personality. I’m personally tired of the epidemic within the truther community of everyone believing anything is possible. We derail quickly with this mentality. Albeit, many possibilities exist, there’s just not enough sourced material to run with. Q explained early on that we have more than we know with all the open source evidence…let’s steer clear of the Corsi types and fun theories and focus.
For instance, we know very little about Rachel Chandler (who was dropped multiple times on posts) yet, if coincidences don’t exist then connecting the dots is very possible.
No, you're just fucking retarded. And yes, those claims would need proof, which conveniently you have none.