Ron @codemonkey: Soon we will know
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
The Senate should tell her that they can't count the votes, because none of them are statititions..
Plus they don't have enough fingers.
LOL
No lie. If this was all a set up to put the spotlight on pedo-apologists 😳 - friggen brilliant. I love this.
I have reservations about much of what codemonkey says, but he nailed this one.
His dad runs the channel Q posts on. For that sake I think we should show respect, shouldn't we?
To his dad, sure. I still don’t buy CMZ’s schtick after his disastrous performance at the cyber symposium.
Still blows my mind he couldn't navigate a Windows machine to save his life.
It’s fine if you can’t because you don’t know it. But if you’re doing a presentation you’d at least rehearse it several times in advance. It’s obvious he didn’t even do that.
Which is hilarious for a guy who goes by "Code Monkey." Really doesn't give a lot of faith for anything technical he's claiming to be an expect on.
Do these Senators even care? They all serve one master…and it ain’t any of us.
Child molestor Supreme Court judge? Unacceptable that they are even trying to install her.
Plus she's stupid. An IQ test should be required before anyone gets elected to public office especially that bunch. Throw in a Patriot background check. If they're Godless leftists communists, no way.
Rep Sheila Jackson Lee.
Easy answer. Almost all of them.
preach it codemonkey, i can't wait to see them. then i'll know who to throw potatos at when the tribunal starts
Yeah. Same here. Stopped following his stuff after a couple things he dropped.
And for biological abomination
I thought I was about to read another MOAB promise that would turn into nothing, but apparently he still likes to make common sense posts.
I believe it will be a majority of the Senate that votes to confirm. This judge, if vetted properly and wasn’t placed in this position to further the moral decay in the U.S., wouldn’t even be considered. Where is the hue and cry re. racism vs. qualifications. It has come down down to assigning numbers rather than names to candidates so justice is blind and decisions are made based on education and job performance? This is how it needs to be done for college admissions-a number assigned for SAT/ACT tests and that number is used for applications. No identifying names, races, addresses which could impact admission decisions. However, if a SCOTUS is confirmed by a Congress which is illegitimate (based on stolen votes), and nominated by an illegal President, doesn’t that SCOTUS become null and void?
Are the white hats in control if Ketanji is nominated, we know kiddie fiddler Lindsay Graham is going to vote for her - he even voted for brain dead Sotomayer. Mittens will how many RINOS are going to sell out their country (again).
How can it ever lose meaning?
Normalization.
Yes, I see what you were going for but I disagree - this will never become accepted as the norm.
Not what I am going for but what the left is pushing and has been pushing for years.
Hope you're right but after watching the sheep follow the MSM on Covid and Ukraine I'm not betting the farm on it.
Easy to think that, but I believe most people find it abhorrent and totally unacceptable.
Right now almost everyone agrees.
When I was a young man, none of the LGBQT was acceptable on any level. They are determined to add P.
They are not determined to add P to that list one bit. How many people who identify as LGBTQ do you know in person or have gotten to know? I've known many and they are all normal people who are obviously against pedophiles and what they do. They also really really hate the fringe nuts who try to justify their own penchant for child abuse by trying to hide behind an LGBTQ label. As I said, how many LGBTQ people do you interact with or know at all on a regular basis? I'm guessing not many, because if you knew them at all you'd know that they are most definitely not pushing or trying or even thinking of adding a P on the end of LGBTQ.
Dems and Reps both will use any tactic for their own benefit without regard to the damage it will do to others.
That said, why do Dems continue to push an agenda that is so universally reviled?
Easy. Their master want them to.
You're caught in an echo chamber. Not everyone thinks as you do, not everyone has the same views as you, or sees the world as you see it. The Democratic agenda is in fact not universally reviled. There are a lot of people who agree with and support the things national Democrats are supporting. You aren't in the majority with your worldview that includes Q or even just conservative ideas. If you think that is the majority, you need to check yourself and the echo chambers you're in.