This post is full of errors so ludicrous they require almost no examination to completely tear to shreds.
First off, Ashkenazi is just the Hebrew word that means "Germanic." Been that way for thousands of years. That word is in the Bible.
Secondly, Yiddish is basically, again, GERMAN, with a little Hebrew thrown in. Why would an Asiatic people be speaking German? The Khazars are from Kazakhstan, where they speak a Turkic language. Does Yiddish sound like Turkish to you?
The Talmud is a collection of commentaries that all disagree with each other, and is not the most holy book in Judaism. That's like calling the works of St. Augustine the most holy book in Catholicism. The most holy book in any branch of Judaism would be the Torah, which most of you would recognize as the first five books in your Bible, followed by the rest of the Tanakh, which you know as the Old Testament.
Maybe there are crypto-Jews descended from the Khazars pulling the world's strings today, but they're certainly not the majority.
I was gonna say. This is....a pretty inaccurate re-telling of the origin story. No sauce either.
It tries to paint the Khazarians as victims the entire time when that's not even remotely true. Sounds like another attempt at fogging up the history books.
I believe most of them are attempts to discredit conservatives. A few of us who are more gullible, and fall for it, might jump on the bandwagon, but it's not hard to manufacture a false majority. A few aged accounts, and a little upvote farming, and suddenly the right are literal Nazis.
Can someone provide an accurate history of the AshkaNaziS and the difference from khazarian s ? Please. I am trying to educate myself about this subject and all I seem to run into are Jewish shills that call me names instead of providing info. The only thing I can state as a matter of fact is that Jewish scholars do look to the Talmud above the Torah . Not my opinion actuall truth from a Jewish rabbi
Thanks Jere, as these points are underappreciated too. I've previously shown that Nazi (from Ignaz, ultimately from Egnatia) has no relation to Ashkenaz, and the same is true of Nasi; and fake convergent etymologies are a favorite of the deluded.
Here is the other thread on the same, where I wrote:
Notes: Mayer Rothschild b. 1744 was the seventh generation since the family had taken the name from its house built in the 1560s. It's true that he was also named Bauer, as dual naming was common in Judaism. The idea that the legend of Bulan can be dated to exactly 740 is rather overspecific. Of course the evidence that all Ashkenazim are Khazars is omitted, and that proposition does not stand scrutiny as such. The Biblical "synagogue of Satan" is not about a prophecy but about two churches extant in 95 AD. It's too bad that sources like this don't produce the facts necessary for their conclusions and then insert other mistakes in their place, because in order for people to draw the conclusion they need the chain of facts such as I have asked for.
The Khazars are Turkmeni, as you say. Not Germanic.
Yiddish is basically just a "Pidgin German", in my view (and someone will come along to tell me I'm wrong in 3, 2, 1...).
The swastika is a symbol we see all across the planet (India, China, North America, etc.), and probably refers to The Ladder in the Sky (star formation) and/or may refer to antediluvian Atlantis (this gets a lot more "out there" as a theory), but does appear to be strongly linked in Europe to the Germanic tribes.
I followed this story to its (actual) white supremacist conclusion. It really is insidious stuff which ultimately claims all of God's people are extinct, and every Jew today is an evil subhuman race. No thanks, I'll keep my Bible.
That would be incorrect. If you think practitioners of Judaism i.e. the drummed up fake race "Jew", aka Pharisaism aka Baal, the Edomites, embrace the first five books of the Old Testament you are very mistaken. Why? Because of the scripture below. They point to Christ, and these bastards, the Satanic Edomite blood line, helped fulfill those Old Testament prophecies by crucifying the Lord and are contrary to all men. 1 Thess 2:14-15
The Torah is all a front and deception.
Jesus said search the scriptures, which were in his time, were Old Testament writings.
John 5:39
“Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.”
The Talmud, below one of many writings.
"The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts."
Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b
Matthew 23:15
“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.”
You teach this, and yet you've obviously never spoken to a Jew about it. No Jew is going to say the Talmud is higher than the Torah.
The Talmud is a commentary. How can a commentary on a text be more highly valued than the text itself?
A commentary that often contradicts itself. The very first passage in the Talmud is about evaluating and weighing the contradictions in the Talmud, and accepting that not every opinion of learned men is automatically the truth.
Read the collected commentaries of Christian authors on the Bible, and you'll come up with some pretty heinous statements, too. That doesn't mean everyone who calls themselves Christian are evil. You, maybe, but not all so-called Christians.
What's so bad about a hypocrite? Is it, perhaps, that they teach the truth, and yet don't follow it?
This post is full of errors so ludicrous they require almost no examination to completely tear to shreds.
First off, Ashkenazi is just the Hebrew word that means "Germanic." Been that way for thousands of years. That word is in the Bible.
Secondly, Yiddish is basically, again, GERMAN, with a little Hebrew thrown in. Why would an Asiatic people be speaking German? The Khazars are from Kazakhstan, where they speak a Turkic language. Does Yiddish sound like Turkish to you?
The Talmud is a collection of commentaries that all disagree with each other, and is not the most holy book in Judaism. That's like calling the works of St. Augustine the most holy book in Catholicism. The most holy book in any branch of Judaism would be the Torah, which most of you would recognize as the first five books in your Bible, followed by the rest of the Tanakh, which you know as the Old Testament.
Maybe there are crypto-Jews descended from the Khazars pulling the world's strings today, but they're certainly not the majority.
I was gonna say. This is....a pretty inaccurate re-telling of the origin story. No sauce either.
It tries to paint the Khazarians as victims the entire time when that's not even remotely true. Sounds like another attempt at fogging up the history books.
OP is a faggot! Lol
I believe most of them are attempts to discredit conservatives. A few of us who are more gullible, and fall for it, might jump on the bandwagon, but it's not hard to manufacture a false majority. A few aged accounts, and a little upvote farming, and suddenly the right are literal Nazis.
Can someone provide an accurate history of the AshkaNaziS and the difference from khazarian s ? Please. I am trying to educate myself about this subject and all I seem to run into are Jewish shills that call me names instead of providing info. The only thing I can state as a matter of fact is that Jewish scholars do look to the Talmud above the Torah . Not my opinion actuall truth from a Jewish rabbi
Thanks Jere, as these points are underappreciated too. I've previously shown that Nazi (from Ignaz, ultimately from Egnatia) has no relation to Ashkenaz, and the same is true of Nasi; and fake convergent etymologies are a favorite of the deluded.
Here is the other thread on the same, where I wrote:
Notes: Mayer Rothschild b. 1744 was the seventh generation since the family had taken the name from its house built in the 1560s. It's true that he was also named Bauer, as dual naming was common in Judaism. The idea that the legend of Bulan can be dated to exactly 740 is rather overspecific. Of course the evidence that all Ashkenazim are Khazars is omitted, and that proposition does not stand scrutiny as such. The Biblical "synagogue of Satan" is not about a prophecy but about two churches extant in 95 AD. It's too bad that sources like this don't produce the facts necessary for their conclusions and then insert other mistakes in their place, because in order for people to draw the conclusion they need the chain of facts such as I have asked for.
Well done.
The Khazars are Turkmeni, as you say. Not Germanic.
Yiddish is basically just a "Pidgin German", in my view (and someone will come along to tell me I'm wrong in 3, 2, 1...).
The swastika is a symbol we see all across the planet (India, China, North America, etc.), and probably refers to The Ladder in the Sky (star formation) and/or may refer to antediluvian Atlantis (this gets a lot more "out there" as a theory), but does appear to be strongly linked in Europe to the Germanic tribes.
I followed this story to its (actual) white supremacist conclusion. It really is insidious stuff which ultimately claims all of God's people are extinct, and every Jew today is an evil subhuman race. No thanks, I'll keep my Bible.
For reference: https://christogenea.org/home/about
Thank You
That would be incorrect. If you think practitioners of Judaism i.e. the drummed up fake race "Jew", aka Pharisaism aka Baal, the Edomites, embrace the first five books of the Old Testament you are very mistaken. Why? Because of the scripture below. They point to Christ, and these bastards, the Satanic Edomite blood line, helped fulfill those Old Testament prophecies by crucifying the Lord and are contrary to all men. 1 Thess 2:14-15
The Torah is all a front and deception.
Jesus said search the scriptures, which were in his time, were Old Testament writings.
John 5:39 “Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.”
The Talmud, below one of many writings.
"The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts." Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b
https://qagg.news/?read=953
Matthew 23:15 “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.”
You teach this, and yet you've obviously never spoken to a Jew about it. No Jew is going to say the Talmud is higher than the Torah.
The Talmud is a commentary. How can a commentary on a text be more highly valued than the text itself?
A commentary that often contradicts itself. The very first passage in the Talmud is about evaluating and weighing the contradictions in the Talmud, and accepting that not every opinion of learned men is automatically the truth.
Read the collected commentaries of Christian authors on the Bible, and you'll come up with some pretty heinous statements, too. That doesn't mean everyone who calls themselves Christian are evil. You, maybe, but not all so-called Christians.
What's so bad about a hypocrite? Is it, perhaps, that they teach the truth, and yet don't follow it?
Why would I go out of my way and speak to a practicing Pharisee who is Anti-Christ?
Judaism and Islam need burned to the ground along with their Mosques and Synagogues.
We'd sure have a more peaceful place without wondering when the next swindle, infiltration and attack would happen.
We'd lose their wicked taxation that bleeds us dry.
And, there it is. You're just prejudiced. You don't have any reasoning behind it. You just hate them, and then found a reason for it.
Yes the Talmud is their most holy book. They look to it above the law books. These people are Baal worshippers knowing or not.