The Kentucky Derby is almost never cancelled. It was delayed, not cancelled for Covid in 2020. Why is this one sport so important?
>It is dubbed ”The Run for the Roses”, stemming from the blanket of roses draped over the winner. It is also known in the United States as "The Most Exciting Two Minutes in Sports" or "The Fastest Two Minutes in Sports" because of its approximate duration. It is the first leg of the American Triple Crown, followed by the Preakness Stakes, and then the Belmont Stakes. Of the three Triple Crown races, the Kentucky Derby has the distinction of having been run uninterrupted since its inaugural race in 1875. The race was rescheduled to September 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Preakness and Belmont Stakes races had taken hiatuses in 1891–1893 and 1911–1912, respectively. Even with the Olympics and major professional sports leagues canceled at those points, the Derby, Preakness, and Belmont took place during the Great Depression and both World Wars.[4]
I don’t think it’s the horses that people bet on, I think it’s the events. The winner forecasts the major event that will be shape that year. The Kentucky Derby happens in May. The event it forecasts will happen some time between one derby and the next.
Sometimes it’s very clear what event it is forecasting and at other times it is not very clear. The history of the sport:
In 1872, Col. Meriwether Lewis Clark Jr., grandson of William Clark of the Lewis and Clark expedition, traveled to England, visiting Epsom in Surrey where The Derby had been running annually since 1780.[8] From there, Clark went on to Paris, France, where a group of racing enthusiasts had formed the French Jockey Club in 1863. They had organized the Grand Prix de Paris at Longchamp, which at the time was the greatest race in France. Returning home to Kentucky, Clark organized the Louisville Jockey Club to raise money for building quality racing facilities just outside the city. The track would soon become known as Churchill Downs, named for John and Henry Churchill, who provided the land for the racetrack.[9] The naming went official in 1937.
The derby has NEVER been cancelled. Only postponed twice. >In 2020, The Kentucky Derby was postponed from May 2 to September 5 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[16] This was the second time in history the race had been postponed, the other being in 1945. Churchill Downs used a new singular 20-stall starting gate for the 2020 Kentucky Derby, replacing the previous arrangement that used a standard 14-stall gate and an auxiliary six-stall gate.[17] The old setup contributed to congestion at the start of the race, especially in the gap between the two gates.[17]
The Kentucky Derby is the oldest continuously held major sporting event in the United States (1875).
This is clearly a very important event for sending a very important comm for what will be the defining event for a year (May of that year until May of next year).
>Longest shots to win the Derby:
91 to 1 – Donerail (1913)
80 to 1 – Rich Strike (2022)
>The industry incurred further setbacks that decade as influential moguls passed away; stalwarts such as Edward Harriman (1919), J.P. Morgan (1913), and James J. Hill (1916) were all lost at this time.
It peaked in 1910 when 4,122 miles were built and slowly declined from that point forward (particularly after 1913).
Investment moved massively away from railroads in 1913 just as the Derby winner predicted.
As Lonewulf also noted: >Dec 1 Ford Motor Company institutes world's 1st moving assembly line for the Model T Ford
The winner in 1937 was WAR ADMIRAL
World War II started officially in 1939, but the lead up to Hitler’s invasion of Poland took a couple years to shape.
After signing alliances with Italy and Japan against the Soviet Union, Hitler sent troops to occupy Austria in 1938 and the following year annexed Czechoslovakia. Hitler’s open aggression went unchecked, as the United States and Soviet Union were concentrated on internal politics at the time, and neither France nor Britain (the two other nations most devastated by the Great War) were eager for confrontation.
On March 12, 1938, German troops march into Austria to annex the German-speaking nation for the Third Reich. >In early 1938, Austrian Nazis conspired for the second time in four years to seize the Austrian government by force and unite their nation with Nazi Germany. Just as War Admiral predicted in May of 1937, the foundation of World War II was being laid. The Derby gave investors plenty of time to know where to put their money. If you know what the Derby is really about then the Derby is an important sign of where to move your money. Move it out of rail in 1913. Move it into weapons in 1937. Get ready. The little people never see it coming, but the rich and powerful let each other know. That way the rich are never caught off guard like the little people are. They always get a heads up.
1963’s winner was Chateaugay >The 1963 Kentucky Derby was the 89th running of the Kentucky Derby. The race took place on May 4, 1963.
In 2008 Obama was elected President and the Derby champion for May, 2008 was Big Brown
(kinda on the nose)
In 2012 Obama was re-elected. The winner of the May, 2012 Derby was *I’ll Have Another (term).
The 2020 Derby was delayed to September 5th and the winner was Authentic. Hm… what could that be referring to? Massive election fraud? So now we have RICH STRIKE winning the 2022 Derby. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Strike
Rich Strike is the second-biggest longshot to have won the Kentucky Derby after Donerail (91–1 odds) in 1913.[4] He was not in the field until Ethereal Road was scratched the day before, with Rich Strike being added from the also-eligible list for the Derby.[5][6] Owner Richard Dawson found out about the change just 30 seconds before the deadline.
He was not in the race until suddenly he was. He appears out of nowhere. He had 80-1 odds which I think is comms for 180 (flip 80-1 to 1-80). Mirror.
He was a longshot. An underdog who appears in the final seconds to win everything. This to me suggest comms from a stunning turnaround for 2022. Things pull a 180 and you get a shocking and complete reversal of fortunes that no one saw coming. What do you think?
Japan's imperial family has been embroiled in an ongoing scandal with its princess and her terrible choice in husband. It has been causing big headaches for their royal family.
I wonder if it could be a reference to Japan's imperial family having a big shake up.
Is the order of the race completely random, meaning the race itself is not rigged, but the dates are cast by the order of the horse?
I don't know. They may adhere to it like a Zodiac or Tarot card reading.
Half of them, to this day, might think of it as a lottery, never knowing the higher ups rigged every minute detail.
I can't be sure of any of this, because I don't have enough first-hand experience with horse racing.
What I do know for certain is that dozens of sealed horse trailers offers a fantastic opportunity to traffic the highest-priced sex slaves.
What if the horse is a proxy for a sex slave? Lots of horses change hands at these events. Millions of bucks for a horse that might only place 10th. Where's the return on that investment.
The only problem I can see with allowing the race to be random, is that it would require preparation ahead of time to be ready to go with whatever event each horse represented. You might have months before your assigned event, or merely weeks (assuming the horse's number was a date.)
I don't think they also control every little thing. I think they are more superstitious than we realize and sometimes they need these rituals to "tell" them the order they should do things in.
The events might be pre-decided but the order might be left to "fate".
Also I think past Derbies were controlled by DS, but I don't think this recent one was. This recent one gave more of a white hat controlled event to me. That's just my feeling.
Sleepy, I'm going to look at this bc i think you are on to something big. When i was watching the clip of the race i kept hearing the announcer say Epicenter, several times, and i want to hear it again in context. This is great work.
I'm wondering, since the horse that won was red (representing the republicans), could this be about the Fall primaries? Are the dems realizing that they're going to get pummeled?
On the flip side of this, could it mean the exact opposite -- that the Dems have something up their sleeve to steal another election?? The 1 in 80 chance?
No, I think the Rich Strike is good news for our side.
The traditional string-pullers wouldn't be cast as the underdog. It also wouldn't depict a horse decked in Republican red that wins bigly in a shocking come from behind victory that no one saw coming if it were for the blue democrats.
If the dems could just "cheat" (which they've never been that successful at for midterms as mid term red waves often prove) their way to victory there were would be no stunning upset. It would already be over if it were that easy.
Q posts already talked about that NSA made it impossible for dems to win by electronic cheating. That is why they needed the pandemic in 2020.
Reference Q post #4688
Create non_digital pathway to rig 2020 Presidential election _engage 80 million mail-in-ballot distribution [coordinated as early as April/May] to sidestep election night defeat [no 'concede'] attempt ballot harvest media push 'we don't know how many ballots are left undelivered by postal service' re: legal challenge battleground states _stall_challenge_push division/chaos _CLAS1-99
That is why they couldn't steal the senate in 2018 like they wanted. Q talks about the NSA had already removed that power. They couldn't cheat by electronics anymore. It wouldn't be enough. Paper ballots were the only way and flagrant cheating.
Now that is also being systematically removed in many states. Paper ballots have been neutered in Texas and others states. Many former cheaters did not get the rewards they thought they would. Many are getting prosecuted (like the one who was caught in that undercover video bragging about her cheating in Texas).
A lot of city voting has moved into giant stadiums were there are cameras. The cheaters were made very aware of that in 2020 and will be nervous of those stadium cameras. Centralizing makes things easier to monitor. If you want more cheating you decentralize.
Plus polling would be lopsided and pushing for a "blue wave" when there is none. The blue wave narrative was just how much they planned to cheat by.
Polling at this point is usually just a psyop meant to demoralize republicans. Usually they'd create the illusion that Abbot and Beto were close (just like they did with Abbott vs Wendy Davis even though he stomped her), but they're NOT doing that. Polls show Abbott dominating Beto. That's crazy. Even if it is a stomp they'd try to pretend its close. They're NOT doing that. That means they know they don't got the cheat they need in Texas.
The 180 to me is a reversal of fortune. Things seem bad under Biden. It looks like the people are getting screwed while the dems get away with everything. The reversal would be that become the opposite. The people start winning in a dramatic comeback and the cheaters start losing.
However, how it happens will be the shocker. The winning horse will only appear at the last minute.
"However, how it happens will be the shocker. The winning horse will only appear at the last minute."
Okay, this makes sense. The part I couldn't figure out was the fact that a red wave in the primaries wouldn't be much of a surprise, as this possibility has been put forth for quite some time now.
Something else I've had in the back of my mind: is it possible that something will come out of nowhere that stops the primaries dead in their tracks? Will we even get so far as conducting the primaries? There's still mail-in ballots going on in some states. What's to stop the Dems from just running the same playbook as last time? However, something big could come out of the woodwork that stops everything.
It’s all too familiar to us now. The alarmist tone, the arbitrary capitalization, the authoritative “hot take” on a complex issue squeezed awkwardly into 140 characters. This is the @realDonaldTrump of today, and it was born on July 6, 2011, at 10:38 AM.
The difference before and after is stark. A majority of Trump’s tweets over the following few months are overtly political, criticizing then President Obama — who went virtually unmentioned on his feed until this day — criticizing Republicans, and particularly ripping into John Boehner, then the Republican Speaker of the House. Here we also finally see those frantic typos we’ve become so accustomed to, something that would rarely happen when Trump’s marketing braintrust was apparently calling the shots. His number of followers steadily grew ever since, surpassing 40 million earlier this month.
Though I dont think the tone of the article was intended to be complementary, stuff like this made me laugh. And the earlier points were just as (perhaps unintentionally) solid.
They made the point thats its clear Trump the man is tweeting on his own account and saying whatever first piqued his interest. Contrast with all the fake and stage managed accounts of other political figures that they probably have very little control over or input into their own accounts. A direct analogy for how they conduct themselves in politics.. fake 'consensus' using the talking heads of crooked, or biden or hussein giving the teleprompter pablum responses they have been ordered to.. versus Trump going right for the throat.
u/dty6 u/lonewulf u/basedcitizen u/sleepydude
Kentucky Derby Comms
The Kentucky Derby is almost never cancelled. It was delayed, not cancelled for Covid in 2020. Why is this one sport so important?
>It is dubbed ”The Run for the Roses”, stemming from the blanket of roses draped over the winner. It is also known in the United States as "The Most Exciting Two Minutes in Sports" or "The Fastest Two Minutes in Sports" because of its approximate duration. It is the first leg of the American Triple Crown, followed by the Preakness Stakes, and then the Belmont Stakes. Of the three Triple Crown races, the Kentucky Derby has the distinction of having been run uninterrupted since its inaugural race in 1875. The race was rescheduled to September 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Preakness and Belmont Stakes races had taken hiatuses in 1891–1893 and 1911–1912, respectively. Even with the Olympics and major professional sports leagues canceled at those points, the Derby, Preakness, and Belmont took place during the Great Depression and both World Wars.[4]
I don’t think it’s the horses that people bet on, I think it’s the events. The winner forecasts the major event that will be shape that year. The Kentucky Derby happens in May. The event it forecasts will happen some time between one derby and the next.
Sometimes it’s very clear what event it is forecasting and at other times it is not very clear. The history of the sport:
The derby has NEVER been cancelled. Only postponed twice. >In 2020, The Kentucky Derby was postponed from May 2 to September 5 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[16] This was the second time in history the race had been postponed, the other being in 1945. Churchill Downs used a new singular 20-stall starting gate for the 2020 Kentucky Derby, replacing the previous arrangement that used a standard 14-stall gate and an auxiliary six-stall gate.[17] The old setup contributed to congestion at the start of the race, especially in the gap between the two gates.[17]
This is clearly a very important event for sending a very important comm for what will be the defining event for a year (May of that year until May of next year).
>Longest shots to win the Derby:
Look at the winner in 1913: Donerail
As Lonewulf noted, done (with) rail (roads). And that is exactly what happened in 1913. https://www.american-rails.com/1910s.html
>The industry incurred further setbacks that decade as influential moguls passed away; stalwarts such as Edward Harriman (1919), J.P. Morgan (1913), and James J. Hill (1916) were all lost at this time.
Investment moved massively away from railroads in 1913 just as the Derby winner predicted.
As Lonewulf also noted: >Dec 1 Ford Motor Company institutes world's 1st moving assembly line for the Model T Ford
The winner in 1937 was WAR ADMIRAL
World War II started officially in 1939, but the lead up to Hitler’s invasion of Poland took a couple years to shape.
1963’s winner was Chateaugay >The 1963 Kentucky Derby was the 89th running of the Kentucky Derby. The race took place on May 4, 1963.
JFK was assassinated 11/22/1963.
Chateaugay’s breed was John W. Galbreath
https://chateaugayhistory.org/ChateaugayFactSheet.pdf
In 2008 Obama was elected President and the Derby champion for May, 2008 was Big Brown
(kinda on the nose)
In 2012 Obama was re-elected. The winner of the May, 2012 Derby was *I’ll Have Another (term).
The 2020 Derby was delayed to September 5th and the winner was Authentic. Hm… what could that be referring to? Massive election fraud? So now we have RICH STRIKE winning the 2022 Derby. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Strike
He was not in the race until suddenly he was. He appears out of nowhere. He had 80-1 odds which I think is comms for 180 (flip 80-1 to 1-80). Mirror.
He was a longshot. An underdog who appears in the final seconds to win everything. This to me suggest comms from a stunning turnaround for 2022. Things pull a 180 and you get a shocking and complete reversal of fortunes that no one saw coming. What do you think?
I think you're right! Great work! i think that things are about to get even more exciting!
u/dty6 u/lonewulf u/basedcitizen
Horses are activists.
Activists are those who are active in any particular movement.
Wild horses are minority and radical activists. Like ANTIFA and BLM.
Race horses are politicians, in every station.
I think you're right. The Derby establishes a betting order for "Big Events."
Don't just look at the front-runner.
Look at all the horse names. Pay attention to every detail. Their program number, the jockey colors, jockey names, odds -- everything.
https://www.kentuckyderby.com/horses
Could we devise an itinerary of events using the order of the horse names?
If each name is a code for an Event, then is this their chosen order of events for the rest of the year?
Follow me here, separate them by months:
June: 21st Rich Strike
July: 3rd Epicenter, 10th Zandon, 13th Simplification
August: 1st Mo Donegal, 14th Barber Road, 18th Tawny Port
September: 5th Smile Happy, 9th Tiz the Bomb, 19th Zozos
October: 17th Classic Causeway
November: 12th Taiba
December: 7th Crown Pride (JPN)
January: 2nd Happy Jack, 6th Messier, 15th White Abarrio
February: 8th Charge It, 16th Cyberknife
March: 11th Pioneer of Medina
April: 4th Summer is Tomorrow, 20th Ethereal Road, 22nd Rattle N Roll
Are these dates for each month?
Edit: I had to move all the dates over a month. May cannot count, as it's the month of the race.
Very interesting. Also interesting this one:
Japan's imperial family has been embroiled in an ongoing scandal with its princess and her terrible choice in husband. It has been causing big headaches for their royal family.
I wonder if it could be a reference to Japan's imperial family having a big shake up.
Race horses = political races = politicians -- makes sense
As for the dating of events...
Are you suggesting that the DS rigs the entire race and the order for every horse?
Or
Is the order of the race completely random, meaning the race itself is not rigged, but the dates are cast by the order of the horse?
I don't know. They may adhere to it like a Zodiac or Tarot card reading.
Half of them, to this day, might think of it as a lottery, never knowing the higher ups rigged every minute detail.
I can't be sure of any of this, because I don't have enough first-hand experience with horse racing.
What I do know for certain is that dozens of sealed horse trailers offers a fantastic opportunity to traffic the highest-priced sex slaves.
What if the horse is a proxy for a sex slave? Lots of horses change hands at these events. Millions of bucks for a horse that might only place 10th. Where's the return on that investment.
The only problem I can see with allowing the race to be random, is that it would require preparation ahead of time to be ready to go with whatever event each horse represented. You might have months before your assigned event, or merely weeks (assuming the horse's number was a date.)
Well they could let some of it be random because that "fate" decides the order they'll do certain events in.
sidenote there was this post about "epicenters":
https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hv2ILsMJ/the-two-epicenters-of-the-biden-/
I don't think they also control every little thing. I think they are more superstitious than we realize and sometimes they need these rituals to "tell" them the order they should do things in.
The events might be pre-decided but the order might be left to "fate".
Also I think past Derbies were controlled by DS, but I don't think this recent one was. This recent one gave more of a white hat controlled event to me. That's just my feeling.
If it's a narrative reveal situation, the order might not really matter.
Like movie releases. The movies are done upwards of several years before their release.
Sometimes movies drop because it's strategically best to do so.
Others, like horror movies, are better dropped in October.
There's a number of factors.
Again, I'm not great at deciphering a definite message, only at offering possible meanings.
Sleepy, I'm going to look at this bc i think you are on to something big. When i was watching the clip of the race i kept hearing the announcer say Epicenter, several times, and i want to hear it again in context. This is great work.
Great summation, SS.
I'm wondering, since the horse that won was red (representing the republicans), could this be about the Fall primaries? Are the dems realizing that they're going to get pummeled?
On the flip side of this, could it mean the exact opposite -- that the Dems have something up their sleeve to steal another election?? The 1 in 80 chance?
No, I think the Rich Strike is good news for our side.
The traditional string-pullers wouldn't be cast as the underdog. It also wouldn't depict a horse decked in Republican red that wins bigly in a shocking come from behind victory that no one saw coming if it were for the blue democrats.
If the dems could just "cheat" (which they've never been that successful at for midterms as mid term red waves often prove) their way to victory there were would be no stunning upset. It would already be over if it were that easy.
Q posts already talked about that NSA made it impossible for dems to win by electronic cheating. That is why they needed the pandemic in 2020.
Reference Q post #4688
That is why they couldn't steal the senate in 2018 like they wanted. Q talks about the NSA had already removed that power. They couldn't cheat by electronics anymore. It wouldn't be enough. Paper ballots were the only way and flagrant cheating.
Now that is also being systematically removed in many states. Paper ballots have been neutered in Texas and others states. Many former cheaters did not get the rewards they thought they would. Many are getting prosecuted (like the one who was caught in that undercover video bragging about her cheating in Texas).
A lot of city voting has moved into giant stadiums were there are cameras. The cheaters were made very aware of that in 2020 and will be nervous of those stadium cameras. Centralizing makes things easier to monitor. If you want more cheating you decentralize.
Plus polling would be lopsided and pushing for a "blue wave" when there is none. The blue wave narrative was just how much they planned to cheat by.
Polling at this point is usually just a psyop meant to demoralize republicans. Usually they'd create the illusion that Abbot and Beto were close (just like they did with Abbott vs Wendy Davis even though he stomped her), but they're NOT doing that. Polls show Abbott dominating Beto. That's crazy. Even if it is a stomp they'd try to pretend its close. They're NOT doing that. That means they know they don't got the cheat they need in Texas.
The 180 to me is a reversal of fortune. Things seem bad under Biden. It looks like the people are getting screwed while the dems get away with everything. The reversal would be that become the opposite. The people start winning in a dramatic comeback and the cheaters start losing.
However, how it happens will be the shocker. The winning horse will only appear at the last minute.
That's how it reads to me.
"However, how it happens will be the shocker. The winning horse will only appear at the last minute."
Okay, this makes sense. The part I couldn't figure out was the fact that a red wave in the primaries wouldn't be much of a surprise, as this possibility has been put forth for quite some time now.
Something else I've had in the back of my mind: is it possible that something will come out of nowhere that stops the primaries dead in their tracks? Will we even get so far as conducting the primaries? There's still mail-in ballots going on in some states. What's to stop the Dems from just running the same playbook as last time? However, something big could come out of the woodwork that stops everything.
Just a thought...
Intersting timeline.
From the article:
Though I dont think the tone of the article was intended to be complementary, stuff like this made me laugh. And the earlier points were just as (perhaps unintentionally) solid.
They made the point thats its clear Trump the man is tweeting on his own account and saying whatever first piqued his interest. Contrast with all the fake and stage managed accounts of other political figures that they probably have very little control over or input into their own accounts. A direct analogy for how they conduct themselves in politics.. fake 'consensus' using the talking heads of crooked, or biden or hussein giving the teleprompter pablum responses they have been ordered to.. versus Trump going right for the throat.
Or even complimentary. ;)