Go jump off the edge of the earth if you think it's flat
Actually, the only ones that believe it has an edge at all, are the ones that believe it's a globe!
Even NASA never said the sun is the center of the universe.
Correct, they said (repeated; it isn't their claim!) it was the center of our "solar system". They say it is the reason for all life on earth. It is their god.
If you have interest in exploring the topic further, please join us on the community I created specifically to discuss such things. Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link.
It's not FLAT, like Q confirmed. There are mountains, valleys, hills, etc. How about do a little research for yourself before you get so hostile? Did you watch the video? The math doesn't lie...it's SCIENCE.
I did. I researched modern astronomy and astrophysics for autistic funsies and there's not one single paragraph there about the sun being the center of the universe, quite the opposite, it's quite the point of it to show you how small our existance is compared to the scale of the cosmic events described from their observations and their data.
Also, if you want to know where sun worship has infiltrated and remains present most of our current organized religions, I strongly reccomend you start reading into something called gnosis.
The more I research this, the more I'm starting to question the official narrative. I always look for converging lines of evidence before I validate theories....and there are plenty. I know Q answered the question: Is the earth flat? Q said NO. However, I also don't believe the earth is FLAT, because it's not---there are mountains, valleys, hills, etc. The question should have been, "is the earth a globe?" Still researching as this belief system is hard to undue, it's all we've known and have been shown our entire lives, our parents' lives, grandparents' lives, etc. It's so engrained in our consciousness.
There has been sound mathematical evidence that Earth is a globe since ancient Greece, Dante Alighieri in the early XIV century already depicted it as a sphere, aswell as the planets, and that was at least 200 years before the Heliocentric model.
How do I know this can be trusted ? The mathematical formulas and measurements are still there, and you can do the number crunching yourself and achieve the same results.
I find it odd that you shut down possible theories as conspiracy. On a Q board, no less, where we are constantly labeled as crazy conspiracy nutjobs. Kettle, meet pot. How about doing your own research instead of just absorbing what you've been told. Isn't this the point of Q? Open sourced research...the bible is very clear on this topic. I'm still researching this topic, have been since 2015 or so, and the converging lines of evidence are pointing more and more towards the biblical view of our world.
Not such a thing as viewpoints with old-time Euclidian geometry. You can repeat some of them yourself with some help from the internet. Ask someone to take a picture of a clear night sky star on different hemispheres of the globe (preferably with a telescope) and you'll see that the constelations change (We have the Northern star from the Ursa Major and the Southern Hemisphere has the Crux constelation (the Southern cross). I know this after seeing pictures taken from friends who are photography enthusiasts and took some of these pictures when they went to Australia
The mere existence of timezones is proof that earth has a rounded and tilted shape and revolvers around the sun, or else the sun would always hit the same longitude with the same intensity all year round, which is responsible for the existance of seasons and why our seasons are the complete inverse of our friends' under the Equator. I know this because I have friends in South America and they are under a warm summer sun in December while I freeze my back off shoveling snow out of my driveway
And, for the last one, you can do the Foucault pendulum. Just tie a weight to a string and slightly spin it, with time, you'll see it spinning in reverse, proving earth is rotating under your feet.
Then again, I never believe anything just because someone told me so. I tested it, repeated it multiple times. And now I believe it.
Ask someone to take a picture of a clear night sky
Looking up to determine the shape of what is in the opposite direction is both foolish and stupid. The shape of the world isn't hidden in the sky. That's dumb.
The mere existence of timezones is proof that earth has a rounded and tilted shape
I know you are just repeating things you heard, because this is also incredibly stupid. Timezones are arbitrary. We made them up. We could unmake them in a whim. They aren't even straight lines / equal areas. They are as real as country/property borders and for the exact same reasons.
proving earth is rotating under your feet.
This is a misunderstanding, but will take longer to explain/explore. I hope you will join us to explore your views further!
I tested it, repeated it multiple times. And now I believe it.
The former is laudable and I extend my sincere kudos to you (almost NO ONE bothers to do that). The latter is why you fail. Belief has NO place in knowledge and is directly across purposes to it. Please discuss it further with me (ideally on the community I created for such discussions. Apparently GA doesn't really want that sort of thing here)
Also, quite the opposite. I stand to prove with arguments backed by experimentation and logic that there's NOT a conspiracy with this subject. Matter of fact, I can suspect, for all I know, that you were fooled by these theories, and that they were injected amidst us in order to muddy the waters and distract us from what matters (exposing the cultural degradation and the corruption being forced by the corrupt global syndicate upon us).
I have to agree with both of you. If round Earth is true (which from my observations, it is), then it will remain true. Kind of how the Bible challenges us to question it, while a fake text doesn't want us to question it.
What I don't agree with is the mantra: "The media said x is not y. Therefore, since the media lies 100% of the time, x is y." Come on, the media is right at least like the broken-clock being right with the time or the boy who cried wolf but there was actually a wolf there.
So I am fooling myself with my own research and observations? Not likely....I know how to research and have been studying this for over 7 years. I'm still not convinced 100%, but there are converging lines of evidence to support. What research have you done to prove the earth is a globe?
Experimentation with calculations, long-distance travels abroad and close contact with friends around the world to collect empyrical data from professional non-doctored pictures (Yes, I run tests on them and collected both digital and analogical (polaroid) evidence to make sure nothing was altered and manipulated). I seldom trust anything just because it has been told me. I weight the evidence, check the data, apply my method, compare and contrast my thesis against opinions from others. If it's proven to be true not only in theory, but empirically after experimentation under the same circumstances, then I assume it to be true.
There has been sound mathematical evidence that Earth is a globe since ancient Greece
This is a misunderstanding. Math doesn't provide evidence. Math is merely a language for description. It's like you're saying english provides evidence for earth being a globe.
The mathematical formulas and measurements are still there,
Formulas, sure! Measurements? No.
What measurements did you have in mind and think were relevant to the shape of the entire world?
Not everything is a conspiracy, friend.
True. Humanity requires no conspiracy to be constantly stupid and wrong as it historically always is.
The question should have been, "is the earth a globe?" Still researching as this belief system is hard to undue, it's all we've known and have been shown our entire lives, our parents' lives, grandparents' lives, etc. It's so engrained in our consciousness.
Why do you think it's a belief system? Why, say when continuously traveling, do objects suddenly appear on the horizon, grow larger and more detailed as you approach, be at their largest and most detailed when you're right next to them, and become less detailed and grow shorter as you go away, until they disappear below the horizon?
That's a great question, and one I witness on my own. I fish out in the middle of the sea of cortez. Now, from shore, the mountains of Baja are barely visible. But still, visable. The distance from my home in Sonora to Baja is around 65 miles, +/-. If the earth was spherical, the curvature...I shouldn't be able to see the mountains from that distance. Do the math on that....like you stated, the horizon should swallow it up so the mountains cannot be seen. Now, those mtns are not the Rockies, not as tall. Furthermore, in the middle of the northern sea of cortez where I prefer to be, lol, I can actually see the sandy beaches to El Golfo, San Felipe, and Puerto Penasco. I'm over 30 miles out from each of those shores, it's equidistant. I shouldn't be able to see a sand beach from either of those places, if the earth was spherical. So to answer your question, imho, it's a matter of perspective. The further away an object is, the smaller it looks.
But the perspective exists because of the lateral and longitudinal curvatures of a round Earth. Weather, refraction, or mirage-effects can change how far you can see things on the horizon.
On a flat-perspective Earth, wouldn't objects keep their same height no matter if you're traveling to or away from them? The only way you know you're getting near or further away would be detectible by the atmospheric and ambient effects existing between you and the object. 🤨😣 It's hard for me to visualize because we perceive things in 3D, not 2D projection.
Or perhaps the Earth is a 3D crescent-shaped snowglobe (the base would be curved up in the direction of the dome, not flat). Filling out the void space underneath the curved base would be the fires and magma. However, wouldn't this whole unit look again, kind of spherical?
Could be, I personally think it's not flat d/t the hills/valleys, peaks, etc. I question everything. Next time I'm out I'm taking my binoculars to see if I can see people on the beaches, lol. But if the earth was spherical, the sandy beaches would disappear at around 24-25 miles or so. The fact I can see them means something is off....I don't have all the answers but I know most of the things we've been taught are not right. We should question everything for ourselves...
Because it demonstrably is. Ask someone what they think the shape of the world is, and their most common answer will be "I believe ..." This isn't coincidence.
Why, say when continuously traveling, do objects suddenly appear on the horizon, grow larger and more detailed as you approach, be at their largest and most detailed when you're right next to them, and become less detailed and grow shorter as you go away, until they disappear below the horizon?
Please join us on the community I created to discuss and explore such (good!) questions! Click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link. I already have a post there specifically about the horizon which explains the answer!
The sad part is many people can simply not look at this with a critical mind. They fight it not with humility but with hubris. They say the earth has to be travelling through the cosmos at a ridiculously impossible speed because they must follow the mantra of nasa nasa nasa data the data data. Sadly those individuals cannot seem to take the time to sit down with an open heart, open mind to try and rectify the space story we've all had shoved down our throats since birth. The shills battle so hard to demonize the space skeptics because they know if their space half truth gets exposed the truth will truly sink in to the normies. The exact same thing is happening with these gene injections. We have armchair knowers that preach efficacy and safety however if you start questioning these individuals it's almost immediately apparent they haven't the slightest clue about the fundamental mechanisms of vaccine methodology or history. They simply know the talking emotion points drilled into them. Same thing with climate normie experts who don't even know that water in its vapour form is the primary greenhouse gas, without which we'd all be dead.
If you can convince a person simply to watch the moon landing videos and be honest with themselves there is no way that hilariously shifty movie could pass for reality, even remotely, in modern times. It is so obvious a movie fantasy of poor quality it will leave the watcher stunned.
Hopefully opening their minds to the possibility all of us have been duped at levels never even imagined. It's alot to take in however if we keep living in Satan's creation how are we to walk with the true nature of grace that God wants us to find through trial and tibulation. God bless and God speed to you all.
It's very difficult being a drift while all those you know and love cannot, even be talked to. All the while Satan and his minions maim all we love. Time is exposing these lunatics however and their disgusting plans are being unraveled right before their very eyes. To those shills blackmailed one way or another, in this world or the next, you will be exposed. Why not just jump into the fire and come clean for your sins. Get off this road to hell and reverse course before its too late.
The best part being that these secret society nutjobs know too much to not see their satanic agenda quickly blowing up in their faces:)
We were all very naive at the time of the moon missions. You notice the missions stopped?
How is it that Apollo 13 had "Houston, we've got a problem" on April 13 @ 13:13?
Oh, just coincidence.
Who took the film of the lunar module taking off from the moon?
Rumor has it Stanley Kubrick had charge of that studio project.
How did NASA lose all moon mission footage?
Why aren't there any stars in space in the moon photos?
Why were the moon rocks eventually traced to Antarctic origin?
Have you ever seen the lunar module at the astroNOT museum in FL?
Looks like tinfoil.
Have you ever seen one of the spacesuits at the same museum?
If you ever did, you said to yourself, "No way is this flimsy suit protective from space radiation and whatnot."
Why is it there are photos in circulation of people who look JUST LIKE the Challenger passengers--you know, the one that supposedly blew up at the launch?
Obviously there were no passengers on the Challenger. So why did it actually blow up? Was that on purpose? Why?
What is the first qualification for becoming an astroNOT?
Being someone who can keep their mouth shut.
You know, like the Mason finger-to-the-mouth sh-sh-sh-sh sign.
NASA's Earth and outer space photos are all CGI.
The Mars Rover is showing you scenes filmed on the far side of Greenland.
Whatever does NASA actually DO with ALL THAT money?
We need to question more of what they tell us is reality. It's all Truman Show, and there are a lot of gatekeepers, knowing as well as unknowing.
Also.... Why don't we go back to the moon? What's going on at Devon Island? Why do the land and water masses on earth look different from one NASA image to the next? Why have astronauts contradicted each other during congressional testimony on simple questions about what it's like to be in outers space?
Beautiful response and use of critical thinking. Once the majority realize the education system hasnt failed and is working perfectly as designed we can begin to heal as a society. Thought exercise: If you were a slave master and needed more slaves how would you design a school to provide you with obedient workers? Now the school system starts to make sense. Almost a mirror to prison design.
Bummer. You are not the only person to mention this... I may need to talk to site admins about it.
So you clicked my username, and didn't see a section on the right hand sidebar titled "Moderator for..."?
Also are you using a phone/mobile browser? I'm trying to figure this issue out. Let me know if you really can't find it / don't see it and I'll send the link to you.
The thing is that, yes, it is a really fast speed, but the universe of orderly whirlpools is a really vast place, and we collectively live a very short time to observe much of that journey.
Try compounding our supposed earth speed with the speed we are supposedly travelling with the sun then what the universe is supposedly travelling and you will see the absurdity. I know it's a tough pill to swallow. How come for thousands of years all the stars have maintained their positions in the night sky? All stars would have to be travelling in complete unison never deviating direction. How would that be possible under the current 'theory' of gravity so eloquently spoon fed by the Jesuit order to the masses? Do yourself a quick favor and watch the moon landing footage. Once you see they can and did pull of that monumental stunt it opens one up to the possibility there are other layers to this rotten onion. God bless and God speed my friend.
Possible I don't have the technology or information to make any calls. All I do know is nasa has created a model that is an illusion. I'm more in the know I don't know group.
Taxpayer money goes in, nothing of value comes out.
If you have interest in exploring the topic further, please join us on the community I created specifically to discuss such things. Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link.
This topic is not relevant regardless. If the earth is flat, does that change anything right now? No it doesn't and you aren't going to convince people of it.
Grouping flat earthers with legit stuff is CIA fuckary
If the earth is flat, does that change anything right now
It changes very little, but the very little it changes are extremely important. For example, what if there were somewhere else to go?
Grouping flat earthers with legit stuff is CIA fuckary
Agreed, amongst other "organizations". "Flat earthers" are a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop. However, the purpose of that psyop is to prevent any earnest discussion or evaluation of the subject (by kookifying / well poisoning).
It sounds like you may have an interest in the topic!
If so, please join us on the community I created specifically to explore and discuss it!
Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link!
What's going on with Jupiter's moons in relation to Jupiter then if you view them through a regular telescope? Is it merely a planetarium projection or something more?
So how do the circles move like that? Why so fast in relation to the other stars? Are they closer to us than the other stars? Why do they hang around Jupiter? Are they attracted to it? They seem to belong to Jupiter somehow; thus they shouldn't be called wandering stars.
So, I worked my way through the article you linked, but I'm left with the question, "Why is this important?" Of course it's important in a historical, archaelogical sense, but why is it relevant to present day? The author didn't provide dates, per se, but most of what he discusses happened 2,500+ years ago. He mentioned that the article is part of a series. Is he leading up to a connection with the ancestry of the Khazars in eastern Europe?
The history in question seems long enough ago that the culture described mostly blended in with local groups as time moved on, with some elites perhaps continuing on through banking families. There doesn't seem to be a unifying goal presented as there is with current discussions, such as those with respect to Zionism. Without some sort of unifying theme, any reference to Phoenicians just fizzles out, so to speak.
Just curious to hear why YOU think this is important. If I'm correct in my assumptions above, then it gives more credence to the lies about the "Twelve Tribes" et al (already recognized by Jewish historians as false), but again, why...aside from the lie...is this Phoenician connection important?
Go jump off the edge of the earth if you think it's flat, glowie. Even NASA never said the sun is the center of the universe.
Actually, the only ones that believe it has an edge at all, are the ones that believe it's a globe!
Correct, they said (repeated; it isn't their claim!) it was the center of our "solar system". They say it is the reason for all life on earth. It is their god.
If you have interest in exploring the topic further, please join us on the community I created specifically to discuss such things. Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link.
It's not FLAT, like Q confirmed. There are mountains, valleys, hills, etc. How about do a little research for yourself before you get so hostile? Did you watch the video? The math doesn't lie...it's SCIENCE.
I did. I researched modern astronomy and astrophysics for autistic funsies and there's not one single paragraph there about the sun being the center of the universe, quite the opposite, it's quite the point of it to show you how small our existance is compared to the scale of the cosmic events described from their observations and their data.
Also, if you want to know where sun worship has infiltrated and remains present most of our current organized religions, I strongly reccomend you start reading into something called gnosis.
i have researched gnosis.
It sounds like you may have an interest in discussing the topic further!
If so, please join us on the community I created specifically to discuss such things.
Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link.
The more I research this, the more I'm starting to question the official narrative. I always look for converging lines of evidence before I validate theories....and there are plenty. I know Q answered the question: Is the earth flat? Q said NO. However, I also don't believe the earth is FLAT, because it's not---there are mountains, valleys, hills, etc. The question should have been, "is the earth a globe?" Still researching as this belief system is hard to undue, it's all we've known and have been shown our entire lives, our parents' lives, grandparents' lives, etc. It's so engrained in our consciousness.
There has been sound mathematical evidence that Earth is a globe since ancient Greece, Dante Alighieri in the early XIV century already depicted it as a sphere, aswell as the planets, and that was at least 200 years before the Heliocentric model.
How do I know this can be trusted ? The mathematical formulas and measurements are still there, and you can do the number crunching yourself and achieve the same results.
Not everything is a conspiracy, friend.
I find it odd that you shut down possible theories as conspiracy. On a Q board, no less, where we are constantly labeled as crazy conspiracy nutjobs. Kettle, meet pot. How about doing your own research instead of just absorbing what you've been told. Isn't this the point of Q? Open sourced research...the bible is very clear on this topic. I'm still researching this topic, have been since 2015 or so, and the converging lines of evidence are pointing more and more towards the biblical view of our world.
Not such a thing as viewpoints with old-time Euclidian geometry. You can repeat some of them yourself with some help from the internet. Ask someone to take a picture of a clear night sky star on different hemispheres of the globe (preferably with a telescope) and you'll see that the constelations change (We have the Northern star from the Ursa Major and the Southern Hemisphere has the Crux constelation (the Southern cross). I know this after seeing pictures taken from friends who are photography enthusiasts and took some of these pictures when they went to Australia
The mere existence of timezones is proof that earth has a rounded and tilted shape and revolvers around the sun, or else the sun would always hit the same longitude with the same intensity all year round, which is responsible for the existance of seasons and why our seasons are the complete inverse of our friends' under the Equator. I know this because I have friends in South America and they are under a warm summer sun in December while I freeze my back off shoveling snow out of my driveway
And, for the last one, you can do the Foucault pendulum. Just tie a weight to a string and slightly spin it, with time, you'll see it spinning in reverse, proving earth is rotating under your feet.
Then again, I never believe anything just because someone told me so. I tested it, repeated it multiple times. And now I believe it.
Looking up to determine the shape of what is in the opposite direction is both foolish and stupid. The shape of the world isn't hidden in the sky. That's dumb.
I know you are just repeating things you heard, because this is also incredibly stupid. Timezones are arbitrary. We made them up. We could unmake them in a whim. They aren't even straight lines / equal areas. They are as real as country/property borders and for the exact same reasons.
This is a misunderstanding, but will take longer to explain/explore. I hope you will join us to explore your views further!
The former is laudable and I extend my sincere kudos to you (almost NO ONE bothers to do that). The latter is why you fail. Belief has NO place in knowledge and is directly across purposes to it. Please discuss it further with me (ideally on the community I created for such discussions. Apparently GA doesn't really want that sort of thing here)
I don't think so (quite the opposite, as a matter of fact), could you please quote the section/statement you interpreted that way?
Also, quite the opposite. I stand to prove with arguments backed by experimentation and logic that there's NOT a conspiracy with this subject. Matter of fact, I can suspect, for all I know, that you were fooled by these theories, and that they were injected amidst us in order to muddy the waters and distract us from what matters (exposing the cultural degradation and the corruption being forced by the corrupt global syndicate upon us).
I have to agree with both of you. If round Earth is true (which from my observations, it is), then it will remain true. Kind of how the Bible challenges us to question it, while a fake text doesn't want us to question it.
What I don't agree with is the mantra: "The media said x is not y. Therefore, since the media lies 100% of the time, x is y." Come on, the media is right at least like the broken-clock being right with the time or the boy who cried wolf but there was actually a wolf there.
So I am fooling myself with my own research and observations? Not likely....I know how to research and have been studying this for over 7 years. I'm still not convinced 100%, but there are converging lines of evidence to support. What research have you done to prove the earth is a globe?
Experimentation with calculations, long-distance travels abroad and close contact with friends around the world to collect empyrical data from professional non-doctored pictures (Yes, I run tests on them and collected both digital and analogical (polaroid) evidence to make sure nothing was altered and manipulated). I seldom trust anything just because it has been told me. I weight the evidence, check the data, apply my method, compare and contrast my thesis against opinions from others. If it's proven to be true not only in theory, but empirically after experimentation under the same circumstances, then I assume it to be true.
Me too! Join us!
This is a misunderstanding. Math doesn't provide evidence. Math is merely a language for description. It's like you're saying english provides evidence for earth being a globe.
Formulas, sure! Measurements? No.
What measurements did you have in mind and think were relevant to the shape of the entire world?
True. Humanity requires no conspiracy to be constantly stupid and wrong as it historically always is.
Exactly.
Please join us to explore and discuss further!
Why do you think it's a belief system? Why, say when continuously traveling, do objects suddenly appear on the horizon, grow larger and more detailed as you approach, be at their largest and most detailed when you're right next to them, and become less detailed and grow shorter as you go away, until they disappear below the horizon?
That's a great question, and one I witness on my own. I fish out in the middle of the sea of cortez. Now, from shore, the mountains of Baja are barely visible. But still, visable. The distance from my home in Sonora to Baja is around 65 miles, +/-. If the earth was spherical, the curvature...I shouldn't be able to see the mountains from that distance. Do the math on that....like you stated, the horizon should swallow it up so the mountains cannot be seen. Now, those mtns are not the Rockies, not as tall. Furthermore, in the middle of the northern sea of cortez where I prefer to be, lol, I can actually see the sandy beaches to El Golfo, San Felipe, and Puerto Penasco. I'm over 30 miles out from each of those shores, it's equidistant. I shouldn't be able to see a sand beach from either of those places, if the earth was spherical. So to answer your question, imho, it's a matter of perspective. The further away an object is, the smaller it looks.
But the perspective exists because of the lateral and longitudinal curvatures of a round Earth. Weather, refraction, or mirage-effects can change how far you can see things on the horizon.
On a flat-perspective Earth, wouldn't objects keep their same height no matter if you're traveling to or away from them? The only way you know you're getting near or further away would be detectible by the atmospheric and ambient effects existing between you and the object. 🤨😣 It's hard for me to visualize because we perceive things in 3D, not 2D projection.
Or perhaps the Earth is a 3D crescent-shaped snowglobe (the base would be curved up in the direction of the dome, not flat). Filling out the void space underneath the curved base would be the fires and magma. However, wouldn't this whole unit look again, kind of spherical?
Could be, I personally think it's not flat d/t the hills/valleys, peaks, etc. I question everything. Next time I'm out I'm taking my binoculars to see if I can see people on the beaches, lol. But if the earth was spherical, the sandy beaches would disappear at around 24-25 miles or so. The fact I can see them means something is off....I don't have all the answers but I know most of the things we've been taught are not right. We should question everything for ourselves...
It's a little more complicated than that (but not much).
Optics are tricky.
Join us on the community I created!
Because it demonstrably is. Ask someone what they think the shape of the world is, and their most common answer will be "I believe ..." This isn't coincidence.
Please join us on the community I created to discuss and explore such (good!) questions! Click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link. I already have a post there specifically about the horizon which explains the answer!
The sad part is many people can simply not look at this with a critical mind. They fight it not with humility but with hubris. They say the earth has to be travelling through the cosmos at a ridiculously impossible speed because they must follow the mantra of nasa nasa nasa data the data data. Sadly those individuals cannot seem to take the time to sit down with an open heart, open mind to try and rectify the space story we've all had shoved down our throats since birth. The shills battle so hard to demonize the space skeptics because they know if their space half truth gets exposed the truth will truly sink in to the normies. The exact same thing is happening with these gene injections. We have armchair knowers that preach efficacy and safety however if you start questioning these individuals it's almost immediately apparent they haven't the slightest clue about the fundamental mechanisms of vaccine methodology or history. They simply know the talking emotion points drilled into them. Same thing with climate normie experts who don't even know that water in its vapour form is the primary greenhouse gas, without which we'd all be dead.
If you can convince a person simply to watch the moon landing videos and be honest with themselves there is no way that hilariously shifty movie could pass for reality, even remotely, in modern times. It is so obvious a movie fantasy of poor quality it will leave the watcher stunned.
Hopefully opening their minds to the possibility all of us have been duped at levels never even imagined. It's alot to take in however if we keep living in Satan's creation how are we to walk with the true nature of grace that God wants us to find through trial and tibulation. God bless and God speed to you all.
It's very difficult being a drift while all those you know and love cannot, even be talked to. All the while Satan and his minions maim all we love. Time is exposing these lunatics however and their disgusting plans are being unraveled right before their very eyes. To those shills blackmailed one way or another, in this world or the next, you will be exposed. Why not just jump into the fire and come clean for your sins. Get off this road to hell and reverse course before its too late.
The best part being that these secret society nutjobs know too much to not see their satanic agenda quickly blowing up in their faces:)
We were all very naive at the time of the moon missions. You notice the missions stopped?
How is it that Apollo 13 had "Houston, we've got a problem" on April 13 @ 13:13? Oh, just coincidence.
Who took the film of the lunar module taking off from the moon? Rumor has it Stanley Kubrick had charge of that studio project.
How did NASA lose all moon mission footage?
Why aren't there any stars in space in the moon photos?
Why were the moon rocks eventually traced to Antarctic origin?
Have you ever seen the lunar module at the astroNOT museum in FL? Looks like tinfoil.
Have you ever seen one of the spacesuits at the same museum? If you ever did, you said to yourself, "No way is this flimsy suit protective from space radiation and whatnot."
Why is it there are photos in circulation of people who look JUST LIKE the Challenger passengers--you know, the one that supposedly blew up at the launch?
Obviously there were no passengers on the Challenger. So why did it actually blow up? Was that on purpose? Why?
What is the first qualification for becoming an astroNOT? Being someone who can keep their mouth shut. You know, like the Mason finger-to-the-mouth sh-sh-sh-sh sign.
NASA's Earth and outer space photos are all CGI.
The Mars Rover is showing you scenes filmed on the far side of Greenland.
Whatever does NASA actually DO with ALL THAT money?
We need to question more of what they tell us is reality. It's all Truman Show, and there are a lot of gatekeepers, knowing as well as unknowing.
Also.... Why don't we go back to the moon? What's going on at Devon Island? Why do the land and water masses on earth look different from one NASA image to the next? Why have astronauts contradicted each other during congressional testimony on simple questions about what it's like to be in outers space?
All good questions!
It sounds like you have an interest in the topic!
If so, please join us on the community I created specifically to explore and discuss it!
Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link!
Beautiful response and use of critical thinking. Once the majority realize the education system hasnt failed and is working perfectly as designed we can begin to heal as a society. Thought exercise: If you were a slave master and needed more slaves how would you design a school to provide you with obedient workers? Now the school system starts to make sense. Almost a mirror to prison design.
Excellent!
It sounds like you have an interest in the topic!
If so, please join us on the community I created specifically to explore and discuss it!
Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link!
clicked username, but could not find link
Bummer. You are not the only person to mention this... I may need to talk to site admins about it.
So you clicked my username, and didn't see a section on the right hand sidebar titled "Moderator for..."?
Also are you using a phone/mobile browser? I'm trying to figure this issue out. Let me know if you really can't find it / don't see it and I'll send the link to you.
A list of mods is always on the right sidebar, but nothing special came up for "Moderator for..."
Yeah, for the communities you are on/in/browsing currently.
First, you click my username! Then the "Moderator for..." section should show up on the right hand sidebar and have a link to my one community!
Let me know if you still can't find it.
I'll try again tomorrow.
Hi, I deleted the comment you asked. I really don't know my way around this website. I never joined anything online before.
Thanks!
That is awesome!
Also, if you have any questions or need any help, let me know!
So I posted something in your discussion spot.
I tried to post something, but there seems to be no response, so I wondered if I did something wrong.
It sounds like you have an interest in the topic!
If so, please join us on the community I created specifically to explore and discuss it!
Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link!
The thing is that, yes, it is a really fast speed, but the universe of orderly whirlpools is a really vast place, and we collectively live a very short time to observe much of that journey.
Try compounding our supposed earth speed with the speed we are supposedly travelling with the sun then what the universe is supposedly travelling and you will see the absurdity. I know it's a tough pill to swallow. How come for thousands of years all the stars have maintained their positions in the night sky? All stars would have to be travelling in complete unison never deviating direction. How would that be possible under the current 'theory' of gravity so eloquently spoon fed by the Jesuit order to the masses? Do yourself a quick favor and watch the moon landing footage. Once you see they can and did pull of that monumental stunt it opens one up to the possibility there are other layers to this rotten onion. God bless and God speed my friend.
Do you believe the moon and stars are projections in a planetarium?
Possible I don't have the technology or information to make any calls. All I do know is nasa has created a model that is an illusion. I'm more in the know I don't know group.
But they don't claim the sun is the center of the universe.
Oopsie!
Go glow somewhere else.
Literally they do not.
Figuratively, effectively, they do.
I agree the specific verbiage was incorrectly chosen.
It is the believed center of OUR universe (the world). To use their parlance, the center of the "solar system".
Our Sun is not the center of the Universe even in this model dumbass. Conspiracies dot win is over that way, glowie.
NASA et al is just another grift.
Taxpayer money goes in, nothing of value comes out.
If you have interest in exploring the topic further, please join us on the community I created specifically to discuss such things. Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link.
This topic is not relevant regardless. If the earth is flat, does that change anything right now? No it doesn't and you aren't going to convince people of it.
Grouping flat earthers with legit stuff is CIA fuckary
It changes very little, but the very little it changes are extremely important. For example, what if there were somewhere else to go?
Agreed, amongst other "organizations". "Flat earthers" are a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop. However, the purpose of that psyop is to prevent any earnest discussion or evaluation of the subject (by kookifying / well poisoning).
It sounds like you may have an interest in the topic!
If so, please join us on the community I created specifically to explore and discuss it!
Just click my username, and on the right hand sidebar under "Moderator for..." will be the link!
What's going on with Jupiter's moons in relation to Jupiter then if you view them through a regular telescope? Is it merely a planetarium projection or something more?
So how do the circles move like that? Why so fast in relation to the other stars? Are they closer to us than the other stars? Why do they hang around Jupiter? Are they attracted to it? They seem to belong to Jupiter somehow; thus they shouldn't be called wandering stars.
So, I worked my way through the article you linked, but I'm left with the question, "Why is this important?" Of course it's important in a historical, archaelogical sense, but why is it relevant to present day? The author didn't provide dates, per se, but most of what he discusses happened 2,500+ years ago. He mentioned that the article is part of a series. Is he leading up to a connection with the ancestry of the Khazars in eastern Europe?
The history in question seems long enough ago that the culture described mostly blended in with local groups as time moved on, with some elites perhaps continuing on through banking families. There doesn't seem to be a unifying goal presented as there is with current discussions, such as those with respect to Zionism. Without some sort of unifying theme, any reference to Phoenicians just fizzles out, so to speak.
Just curious to hear why YOU think this is important. If I'm correct in my assumptions above, then it gives more credence to the lies about the "Twelve Tribes" et al (already recognized by Jewish historians as false), but again, why...aside from the lie...is this Phoenician connection important?
So, you believe that there is a continuing tribe of Phoenicians somewhere, unnoticed, behind the "curtain"?
The last society that openly practiced child sacrifice. Until ours....the rulers of this planet are of the same culture.