BREAKING: Jack Posobiec temporarily locked out of Twitter for calling Disney 'groomers'
(thepostmillennial.com)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
What's going to happen when Musk makes a similar post? No way in HELL they are going to suspend the account of their highest shareholder.
That would be a good test to see if their wokeism is more powerful than their corporate governance.
There's no way Musk is gonna make a comment like that. He skirts the line, but never crosses.
(Quintessential asshat behavior)
It would be news of Twitter didn't ban someone for calling Disney groomers. They are covering for one of their own.
Just so no one forgets (not that anyone on this forum ever would), Twitter banned Trump and is quick to ban anyone for mis-gendering some one. However, they seem to have a problem with banning child porn. And this is no accident, if you see what the ban and fail to ban as a whole, it becomes very clear what they are about. Here is one of many articles about this:
https://nypost.com/2021/01/22/twitters-policing-problem/
And even though this articles seems to be nicer to when talking about twitter than it deserves (so you can forward it to normies), you still get interesting quotes like:
To repeat: Child porn is not a violation of twitter policy. But mis-gendering or calling out a groomer is.
Also, if you must have links to twitter, replace twitter.com with nitter.net. Nitter helps to minimize twitter's ability to track you and make money off it. It's also supposed to be faster and more secure.
But it's true, though?
I'm pretty sure Walt used the binary 'boys and girls' all the time, so most all those old Disney films should just be wiped from the internet, like with a cloth or something.
He didn't. The guy was staunchly conservative. He was an old-school, anti-union boss. During the McCarthy era, he testified in front of the the House of UnAmerican Activitiies committee and threw many known and alleged commies to the wolves. He believes the animator strike was started by commies, and communist radicals in Hollywood in an effort to get him to bend the knee and gain a foothold of power in his own business.
He fired many animators at the time for starting this shit, but ultimately he lost. He allowed his animators to unionize. He was losing too much money in the film business at the time.
Well I've done fairly extensive OG research on Walt and he was a nazi royalist pedo luciferian running an extensive multi-faceted globalist cabal operation with children as an audience. His animation had already been done in Germany and he brought it over here. Nazis hate unions and communists except when they pose as them and vice versa. If you knock real hard on the door of the 33 Club at Disneyworld, they might let you in, try it.
And that 666 font trick in Disney's name? Coincidence
Walt had no control over his Empire of Evil?
You know............I had a friend who created his own little magazine about what he called "The Disneyfication of America".
He was a radical. He didn't give 2 fcks. He called his mag "Mickey's Little Pink Asshole".
It laid bare all the thinly veiled intent of the Magic Kingdom and its effect on America and the world.
This was mid 80s. His mag got picked up by a syndicated publisher and got attention. Suddenly.
And just as suddenly, he discovered he couldn't fly from the top of the highest parking garage in town.
So your defense of Walt made me wonder what he would have said about the idea that he wasn't in conscious control of his kingdom's part in the Plan.
If I research hard enough I can find facts that tell me I'm a satanic monster in league with the illuminati, lizard people, and limp bizkit.
Do I believe that there are labs all over the world making new pathogens?
Yes
Do I believe there is a ring of pedophiles at the highest levels of our world?
Yep
Do I believe Putin is on the side of good fighting the good fight?
Of course.
Do I believe the people at the top sacrifice children to moloch?
No.
Do I believe in chem trails, flat-earth, and lizard people?
Fuck no.
And when I read stuff like this, and do some research into what was said or out there, it comes no where close, or there are zero references to cold hard evidence.
Its why I stopped posting around here... too many wacky ideas and people here that really don't stand up to scrutiny. Some of the stuff said around here is worth noting, and can make sense with a little logic and research... but then I come across stuff like "Micky's Pink Little Asshole" and I check out.
If one researches hard enough, one finds truths if one knows how.
Pretending hard research leads to error is showing lack of understanding of what research should be.
The fact that you're confused on Walt's background and character show you lack that understanding or ability or desire to find out.
That's the best part about open forum discussion. It doesn't allow people to hide behind ignorance for long.
wtf does "But then I come across stuff like "Mickey's Little Pink Asshole..." even supposed to mean? I'd love to hear it.
You don't know wtf you're talking about.
And you can't prove a negative, like "Uncle Walt wasn't this or that"..... You haven't done the work and blame it on others who have. You explain the elephant in the dark by denying it's existence.
Good luck with that.
And ad hoc attacks won't work either. I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, therefore whatever you said about Christmas is wrong.
You want to dis the memory of my murdered friend over the subject, calling me a liar and him .........what? Mistakenly dead?
Now you need to cast dispersion on the whole site because everyone here doesn't fit your worldview.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
The guy was an asshole.
http://www.whale.to/b/sp/blood.html
Read up about the Disney bloodline. He was a grade A asshole and satanic fiend.
Why does anyone care?
Takes one to know one I suppose. I still don’t trust Blosopiac.
Meh. He's more mainstream but he hates commies, is anti-vax, anti pedos, and pro-America. You want to start throwing shade on guys like him and we'll literally have no one who has any reach in the media.
He's not just "anyone" though.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/
Q himself called him out.
Well Q told us to trust a few who have done nothing good either so he's not batting 1000 there. Maybe Poso is bad, if so we're all truly F'd. If the very few high profile sources we have (Tucker, Poso, etc) are all blackhats, what the hell do we have?
I have a hard time trusting anyone who use to work for the CIA. I mostly leave him be because he doesn't seem like a plant but I don't think I'll ever trust him on anything that requires it. I'll never go to an event he supports and any info I need to hear from independent sources to believe.