Last night I posted the theory that Google, Twitter, FB were under white hat control. In the first Q drop I gave you Q says these 3 entities were tracking you using GPS location. There is a movie coming out called "2000 Mules". Are the pieces starting to fall into place yet? - The Great Awakening

194

Last night I posted the theory that Google, Twitter, FB were under white hat control. In the first Q drop I gave you Q says these 3 entities were tracking you using GPS location. There is a movie coming out called "2000 Mules". Are the pieces starting to fall into place yet?

posted 2 years ago by jhartz39 2 years ago by jhartz39 +196 / -2

Here is my post from last night.

https://greatawakening.win/p/15HIm81D2H/we-are-living-under-a-devolved-g/

A anon asked, "Then why are they still de-platforming patriots?"

My response to him:

"I assume they can't let the cat out of the bag just yet. Perhaps they are monitoring these platforms and still collecting data on the fly. I'm sure BLM, MS 13 and Antifa use these platforms to communicate. Why tell your enemy you are watching them?

If they changed mode of operations people would get wise and the advantage the white hat team had would be gone.

If you look at the very first Q post I gave you see that Google, Twitter and FB is tracking you using GPS location. How was the evidence for 2000 mules obtained?"

What if the intention was to eliminate all the honest, hard working American's who believe in the American dream, what do you have left. You would be left with ballot traffickers, gang members and child traffickers. Would it make the job of the white hat intel agents easier if you eliminated all the people you didn't need to track?

The evidence to create the movie "2000 Mules" was made possible by putting together pings from GPS locations. In fact President Trump just said so at his last rally.

In my post last night I said, "I would be willing to bet the $400 million given to the swing states by Mark Zuckerberg was a trap. Lets see who takes the money to set up drop boxes to steal the election."

In retrospect, taking the money for the drop boxes wouldn't be the illegal part. But what you would be doing is similar to setting a mouse trap, lets see who takes the cheese. People like Stacey Abrams couldn't help themselves, if they see a way to cheat, they will take it.

Thats why a cameras were set up watching these drop boxes. Not to prevent fraud, to catch the fraud. They knew stupid people would take advantage of the boxes and the trap was set.

I remember a judge allowing 145,000 absentee ballots in Fulton county to be audited. I also remember Stacey Abrams saying she had 1 million absentee ballots for the run off election left over from the general election. 1+1=2. Set up the boxes and they will come.

I bet if you looked at the locations of these drop boxes you would find they were placed in Democrat cities who had issues with ballot harvesting in the past.

We have been given all the details, Q told us we have more than we know. We just have to look at this stuff from a different perspective. $400 million for drop boxes = bad.....No! $400 million for drop boxes = good....lol!

Stay safe my frens!!!

WWG1WGA!!!

9 comments

9 comments share save hide report block hide replies

Comments (9)

sorted by:

▲ 15 ▼

– SemperSupra 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

What if the intention was to eliminate all the honest, hard working American's who believe in the American dream, what do you have left. You would be left with ballot traffickers, gang members and child traffickers. Would it make the job of the white hat intel agents easier if you eliminated all the people you didn't need to track?

That's a very interesting theory. It does make sense. Shills, or the narcissistic minions that want the corruption to stay, always try to hide and blend among the sheep. The worst the thing you could do is remove the sheep. You are taking away their cover.

When patriots are driven off the site you also eliminate their ability to spy on patriots. Remember they can read your private messages. Does it really serve them to remove and drive out patriots the way they do? You are forcing them to other platforms. Even if you control some of those you're making the job of spying on them 10 times harder because it's more decentralized.

By dispersing the patriots and the sheep you only making it harder to watch them and read and control their communications.

They'd be better off letting patriots remain on facebook and twitter where they can shadowban and control their communications. Also half of twitter is becoming bots.

It's now liberals. leftists and bots.

Thats why a cameras were set up watching these drop boxes. Not to prevent fraud, to catch the fraud. They knew stupid people would take advantage of the boxes and the trap was set.

Also interesting. I've thought the same about moving all the city voting precincts from tiny decentralized locations to highly centralized ones.

It works the other way.

If you want to make it easy to commit crimes you decentralize. It's harder to watch a 100 different precincts. Easier to commit fraud.

Centralizing it makes it a lot easier to watch for crime. All those giant voting arenas had cameras in them.

So decentralizing patriots (driving them off social media) and spreading them across gab, parler, and all the dozens of different social media made it harder to spy on them. Even if some of those were compromised they are all over the place.

Meanwhile, leftists were corralled and centralized into voting arenas where they were easier to watch.