Musk is a distraction. Always has been. I've been following Musk/Tesla for more than 5 years. I was an investor in TSLA. Based on my following of him during those 5 years, he should not be trusted.
Here's why:
First and foremost, Musk's takeover of Twitter is the single largest exestential threat to Truth's success. The DS knows Truth is already successful - why there has been so much FUD and short interest in DWAC. We'll come back to this.
Second, Musk has a long history of making intentionally inaccurate and misleading statements via Twitter with the sole purpose of manipulating stock prices, mainly TSLA. For evidence of this, simply look up the SEC sanctions and penalties levied against Musk for numerous material mistatements.
Third, one of Musk's most costly material mistatements was when he claimed that a buyer had been found for Tesla, tweeting "$420. Funding secured". This tweet alone sent the share price up close to 20% before the SEC stepped in due to no buyer even being identified, let alone an offer made. *note the price, $420. 4/20. Stoners. - these figures/prices aren't real - they're nods to meme stonkers.
Fourth, Musk is now offering to buy Twitter for $54.20 a share. There's that "420" again.
Now, back to Musk/DWAC. Dorsey was a DS tool. Just like Zuck. So knowing that Truth is exploding, and represents a true threat to DS narrative control, what's more plausible?
Musk has benefited to the tune of billions from the U.S. government, i.e. they own him. The subsidies to SpaceX and Tesla alone made Musk rich. Then, the corrupt SEC approved a compensation plan for Musk (at Tesla) that was the largest single piece of financial fraud ever.
So if you're the DS, how do you stop Truth? You bring in Musk to "recreate" Twitter, preventing millions of users from ever leaving because Twitter is "reformed". Doesn’t matter if absolutely nothing changes and censorship runs rampant - Musk said he changed it and that will be enough for the normies.
Don't let Musk dustract you. This is just my opinion.
Instead of a downvote, I'll give you an opportunity to defend your argument.
It's not tweets that have led many anons to trust Elon Musk - it's facts. For one, Trump made him the largest DoD contractor throughout his first term. Why would Trump do that, also enabling the construction of Starlink, if it served the deep-state?
Trump has never said a negative thing about Musk.
Musk is constantly attacked by the MSM, and he is constantly trolling them.
Musk has warned against AI, big tech, transhumanism (I think his pig-brain demo was really about waking normies), and now he's taking down twitter.
I could go on, but Musk's detractors rarely address even one of these things. To be clear - I'm not 100% on him being a white-hat myself. Fog of war.
I'll play ball.
Musk's word is meaningless. Fact. Elon has missed missed more deadlines than Q. He has consistently misrepresented delivery stats, profit margins, and true costs related to Tesla. The cyber truck was supposed to be in production by now, for example.
Trump did not make them the largest DoD contractor. SpaceX was working on those projects (and contracts) way before. Even if expenditures to SpaceX from DoD did increase, it's meaningless. Boeing. Lockheed. Raytheon. Etc.
Trump never saying anything negative about Musk, if that can even be confirmed, is also meaningless.
"Musk has warned about AI...", yet his cars have more AI than any other device that can literally kill you...
I could also go on, but it's all about perspective I suppose.
We're talking about whether or not Musk is working with Trump to take down the cabal, and you bring up cybertruck? I don't think we're on the same page here.
If SpaceX and Starlink benefitted the deep-state, Trump would have shut down the funding.
Frankly, you seem more focused on your pre-conceived notions of Musk than the facts...
Most of musk's haters do not understand his position on AI, and fear him because they fear it. What people dont realize is that Musk also fears AI, which is why he is focusing on it - he doesnt trust others to develop ai that will benefit people, and he sees AI as inevitable, thus: openAI, tesla AI
Hes afraid of it being used as a weapon by people to hurt other people.
Exactly. He has repeatedly warned the public about the dangers of AI.
I understand the wariness toward Elon Musk. But IMO, analysis of all of the facts points strongly toward him being a white (or at least light gray) hat.
Elon has been decoded as Flipped since March 2018. The threats Q made about an African American we all thought was Obama around this time has been decoded to actually be about Elon, another African.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/02/13/elon-musk-the-x-bank/#Flipped
Was Elon a Clown? 1000%. We're talking about the creation of X.com, precursor of PayPal, used to fund Clown Ops. We are talking child sex trafficking, and school shooters (MKUltra) here. Started up 1.5 months before Columbine.
Ahh I see another person who follows decode's blog. Nice.
Doesn't mean he can't or hasn't flipped back. When was that Q post? It's been a while. Anything can happen.
That comment is the definition of dooming.
Q has never date fagged.
::John McEnroe voice:: You cannot be serious!
Q1 on 10/28/17 was a GIANT DATEFAG.
Q reposted Anon:
To which Q himself added:
Q1 = Datefag Deluxe (not that there's anything specifically wrong with that, in this case...misdirection is necessary :)
Prove me wrong
I get it is easy to insinuate it but q did not say 2017 in his original post.
Your post and this comment all sound like very emotional gripes that things didn't happen the way you expected. You haven't said anything negative about Elon at all.. there is no substance in your reasoning. He also named all the models so they spell SEXY. Does that mean he's deep state?
If you've been following him for 5 years, I would expect you to mention things that he's done that have derailed the plan or tried to prevent something important from happening.. or sway public opinion in a specific direction against the plan.
All you've listed is he meme's and timelines got pushed? What?
No just means he's a clown. And won't be saving the world.
Are you trying to say that Trump wouldn't appoint a swamp monster?
No, that is not what I am saying.