83% of the shareholders are the like of Vanguard, BlackRock and others.
These majority shareholders will vote the same as the board that represents them. How one can expect different outcome? Majority shareholders already voted ... as a board. Asking remaining 17% for their opinion wouldn't make any difference.
The shareholders can decide whether they want to earn less/earlier or more/later.
It's up to each shareholder if they believe certain decision is right for the business or not. Sometimes the decision that seems to be wrong short term is good long term. It happens all the time.
I'm not saying in this case it's be wrong decision but it's not always about the instant cash in. They may dream to sell it in 3 years for 5x and that's how they can justify their decision (which effectively means: always "No", no matter what price is being offered, they can replace 5x with 10x, rinse and repeat).
We need to learn and notic that the whole thing is a set up and a distraction. These guys are all shareholders at Tesla. They could discuss this acquisition hundred times already. They know each other very well. They don't have to talk on Twitter. It's a theatre for this who wanna get distracted.
You guys are missing the facts Twitter stocks could be shorted and counterfeit shares are everywhere. It happened to GME. If there’s a vote the turn out could be over 100% and not in Blackrock’s favour. Bring it
Oook, well it seemed extremely vague...like...not even a subtle clue to that. It reads, straight up, like you were dooming GME, which made me do a doubletake like WTFLOL?
It's a nonsense.
83% of the shareholders are the like of Vanguard, BlackRock and others.
These majority shareholders will vote the same as the board that represents them. How one can expect different outcome? Majority shareholders already voted ... as a board. Asking remaining 17% for their opinion wouldn't make any difference.
Not sure about that! If they devalue the stock if Musk buys more, would that be in their best interest? They’re all about making money, not losing it.
Yes and no.
They're about money. Yes.
The shareholders can decide whether they want to earn less/earlier or more/later.
It's up to each shareholder if they believe certain decision is right for the business or not. Sometimes the decision that seems to be wrong short term is good long term. It happens all the time.
I'm not saying in this case it's be wrong decision but it's not always about the instant cash in. They may dream to sell it in 3 years for 5x and that's how they can justify their decision (which effectively means: always "No", no matter what price is being offered, they can replace 5x with 10x, rinse and repeat).
We need to learn and notic that the whole thing is a set up and a distraction. These guys are all shareholders at Tesla. They could discuss this acquisition hundred times already. They know each other very well. They don't have to talk on Twitter. It's a theatre for this who wanna get distracted.
hmm 17 you say
You guys are missing the facts Twitter stocks could be shorted and counterfeit shares are everywhere. It happened to GME. If there’s a vote the turn out could be over 100% and not in Blackrock’s favour. Bring it
As with GME we will see nothing is as it seems.
Remember - rules for Thee and not for Me
Nothing would be exposed if Superstonks didn't exist. This shows you have a shallow knowledge of Superstonks.
Uhh, GME closed at $150 Friday from it's "going out of business" low of under $4 little over a year ago. I wouldn't call that "nothing"
Seriously, wake up.
That’s what I was getting at. GME wasn’t supposed to work accord to them.
Oook, well it seemed extremely vague...like...not even a subtle clue to that. It reads, straight up, like you were dooming GME, which made me do a doubletake like WTFLOL?
but aight then...🤷♂️