True... idiocy upon idiocy. What we don't know, though, is how sick (with whatever) any of these people were such that they felt the need to get tested.
I have the same question. It would be interesting to see the incidence of ALL diseases based on vaccine status. I suspect the jabbed are experiencing antibody-dependent enhancement(ADE) and are increasingly susceptible to all diseases. I think the DMED report leaked a couple months back shows this.
Link: https://greatawakening.win/p/141YDyNIEb/dmed-report/c/
That’s what I thought, but Walgreens breaks out the tests given by vax status as well and 27% were unvaxxed so I suspect the unvaxxed are over-represented in this data.
Besides, this is “rates of positivity” so it’s automatically adjusted for differing numbers of people per cohort.
You might argue that vaxxed are more likely to get tested when feeling sick, but then you have to wonder why did 90% of the unvaxxed go get tested?
I think this data is pretty clear: the vaxxed are getting sick more readily than the unvaxxed. This is ADE or negative efficacy (same thing).
Or more likely to take a faulty test.
Showing its a mental illness...
True... idiocy upon idiocy. What we don't know, though, is how sick (with whatever) any of these people were such that they felt the need to get tested.
I have the same question. It would be interesting to see the incidence of ALL diseases based on vaccine status. I suspect the jabbed are experiencing antibody-dependent enhancement(ADE) and are increasingly susceptible to all diseases. I think the DMED report leaked a couple months back shows this. Link: https://greatawakening.win/p/141YDyNIEb/dmed-report/c/
Great insight. And thanks for the link!
Now check the timeline for the increases in cases compared to when the FDA approved a fourth booster for the old and chronically ill.
You’ll see it started about two weeks after the announcement.
They are prolonging this shit with the boosters.
That’s what I thought, but Walgreens breaks out the tests given by vax status as well and 27% were unvaxxed so I suspect the unvaxxed are over-represented in this data.
Besides, this is “rates of positivity” so it’s automatically adjusted for differing numbers of people per cohort.
You might argue that vaxxed are more likely to get tested when feeling sick, but then you have to wonder why did 90% of the unvaxxed go get tested?
I think this data is pretty clear: the vaxxed are getting sick more readily than the unvaxxed. This is ADE or negative efficacy (same thing).