A technology existing is not the same as it becoming widely adopted. Musk is a cult of personality created to market these technologies and drive wide adoption. People will put their trust in a man and accept slave chips in their heads and slave carriages in their garages.
Transparency and regulation are no shield against an opaque government or corporation. Both government and the corporate world operate hand-in-glove.
This tech is already being marketed to the public and circumstances are already being manipulated to essentially force people to accept these technologies even if they don't fall for the marketing.
The difference between a Gates doing it and a Musk doing it is everyone perceives Gates as evil.
Gates funding a bioweapon is him funding a mass murder tool that gets unleashed upon us.
Musk funding Neuralink is a popular charismatic making a control mechanism that must see wideapread voluntary adoptiom by the public before they can force it on the resistors.
A lot of people are very negative about technology. I think it is because of hysteria. Technology is neither good nor evil, it is merely a tool. The tool can be used for good or evil, depending on the wielder. Virtually all of our technology has the capacity for wonderful, as well as, awful uses. The greater the capacity for good, the greater the capacity for evil.
Tech isn't always useful in the way that it was intended. Sometimes tech makes life more complicated. It just depends on how you use it. Moderation is key. Higher tech is not always better tech. Sometimes older, more reliable tech can be superior in a particular arena.
I'm referring to face scanning. Access to phone calls and messaging, heat seeking missiles, Mach 3 jets, drones, satellite imagery, surveillance and weaponry in general.
This is an incredibly naive take.
A technology existing is not the same as it becoming widely adopted. Musk is a cult of personality created to market these technologies and drive wide adoption. People will put their trust in a man and accept slave chips in their heads and slave carriages in their garages.
Transparency and regulation are no shield against an opaque government or corporation. Both government and the corporate world operate hand-in-glove.
This tech is already being marketed to the public and circumstances are already being manipulated to essentially force people to accept these technologies even if they don't fall for the marketing.
Tell that to mrna vax mandates
Which is why some tech shouldn't be developed.
What's to stop a Bill Gates-type from funding a Fauxi-type to produce a biological or mechanical weapon? All they have to do is simply stay quiet.
The difference between a Gates doing it and a Musk doing it is everyone perceives Gates as evil.
Gates funding a bioweapon is him funding a mass murder tool that gets unleashed upon us.
Musk funding Neuralink is a popular charismatic making a control mechanism that must see wideapread voluntary adoptiom by the public before they can force it on the resistors.
A lot of people are very negative about technology. I think it is because of hysteria. Technology is neither good nor evil, it is merely a tool. The tool can be used for good or evil, depending on the wielder. Virtually all of our technology has the capacity for wonderful, as well as, awful uses. The greater the capacity for good, the greater the capacity for evil.
Who ends up with the highest end tech first?
Tech isn't always useful in the way that it was intended. Sometimes tech makes life more complicated. It just depends on how you use it. Moderation is key. Higher tech is not always better tech. Sometimes older, more reliable tech can be superior in a particular arena.
I'm referring to face scanning. Access to phone calls and messaging, heat seeking missiles, Mach 3 jets, drones, satellite imagery, surveillance and weaponry in general.