Author of Alice in Wonderland was a known pedophile.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
Recommend you lend your talents to DecodingSymbol's telegram
Alice decode:
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/02/08/alice-wonderland-rabbit-comms/
Jell-O decode:
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/10/06/cosby-jell-o-office-king-of-the-hill/
This site belongs to a guy that thinks we faked all the NASA missions because no one had enough fuel to get to the moon.
Because they'd be constantly thrusting.
Because momentum does not exist.
Love out of touch comments like this, means Symbols is Over The Target. He never says all NASA missions are fake. But the Moon Landing?
"Every major technological accomplishment in history is always repeated over & over again with rapid improvements. Consider:
And yet 40 years after man walks on the moon? Not a single person or country has followed, nor even attempted to do so! Does that not seem strange and illogical?
In some places the perspective on what happened is quite different than here.
07/27/2018 Only 24 percent of Russians believe that American astronauts landed on the moon https://sputniknews.com/science/201807271066736384-russians-polled-on-moon-landings/
So which country is right?"
-https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/decoding-truth-from-historical-lies/
I don’t necessarily disagree with your assertion about the moon, but your reasoning in this instance isn’t that great. There are still benefits from going to America, flying across the Atlantic, and launching satellites. There don’t seem to be as many benefits of going to the moon.
If we never went to the moon then we would be less familiar with the lack of benefits of going to the moon, and we would be more enticed to go there for the first time to see for ourselves. The fact that people haven’t been interested in going to the moon in about 50 years might indicate that they really did go there and confirmed it’s not worth going.
I’d guess that humans have been on the moon, as telescopes can see man-made items on its surface (unless you’re one of those ‘the-night-sky-is-fake’ types). The footage from Apollo 11 is fishy. The people who have theorized about a possible background matte painting that limits the distance of the rover might have a point. Also the low-g movement of people and the flag is sometimes strange. So maybe they went to the moon in the early 1970s but not in 1969. Or maybe they did make it there in 69 but didn’t like the footage, so they used some fake footage. I’m not sure.
I am a ('all telescopes powerful enough to see items on the Moon are fully controlled by Clowns' type).
/u/RugerP89
To interject in this discussion with my 2 cents, the symbols guy does make some rash judgement calls, in my opinion.
In all honesty, I think we were on the moon long, long before the moon landing supposedly took place.
The landing was, therefore, pantomime to establish comms.
With what? It's not so clear. The moon stands for so much in so many cultures, it may well be a declaration that JFK was really looking for a way to land on the subconscious mind (maybe to reverse MK Ultra brainwashing, which we learned how to do from the NAZIs?). I'm not convinced of that, so let's continue to assume they did go to the moon, but under illusory auspices.
The decodingsymbols guy also claims nuclear bombs don't exist either.
I think it's not all that simple.
Like every other symbol comm, for a Mirror to exist, the Real must exist as well, in some capacity. Think of it like a Mountain and a Still Pond. The Pond reflects the mountains, and you can obviously muddy the waters or add waves that distort, but you aren't affecting the Truth, in that the Mountain itself had not been shaken.
So, yes, I think we did land on the moon, but with technology FAR AND AWAY more advanced than they'd like for the public to know about. So, they created a fake moon landing to show the public we did go there, but made us think that strictly 60's era technology was capable of doing so.
What technology did they want to prevent us from knowing about? I'd wager it was Ether/Aether or some other form of propulsion-less craft that would clearly demonstrate the use of free-energy systems, a la Nikola Tesla's resonant frequency devices.
How does that sit with you two?
That true facts are perpetually unclear lends to the secrecy of the comms, and is why AI can never decode them -- it requires discerning human with first-hand knowledge of natural phenomena and relationships.
No value. There's nothing there. Nothing we didn't put there, anyway.
Criticism means you're "over the target?" Then you're never wrong.
If people agree, you're right. If people disagree, you're Over The Target.
It's unfalsifiable. "There's no monster under the bed--meaning it's HIDING, which is just further proof of its threat!"