I think it wouldn't matter if it was Barr, or Garland. Both of those uniparty stooges would bury, deflect, marginalize, or diminish the Durham findings if given half a chance to do so. And I'm not entirely convinced that Durham himself wouldn't do the same.
Barr is definitely NOT the same thing as Garland. The only reason why Durham even exists is because Barr made him SC quietly before the election. He's informed of at least a part of the plan.
Barr also ended the Huber investigation, and transferred Huber's work to Barr's boy, Durham. The same Durham that should have dropped some bombs before the 2020 election. The same Durham that has so far declined to sentence one busted swamp criminal, and has charged another, Sussman, with the whopping criminal charge of lying.
It's 2022, and mid terms are almost here, and that's all we have got from Barr in the last 5 years. Exactly ZERO swamp rats are behind bars. Meanwhile, the USA continues along its dystopian course set by the uniparty, and with a new minister of disinformation who sings Mary Poppins to the peasants, as if citizens are children.
What did Barr do about Eric Holder's Fast&Furious gun running?
What did Barr do about Lois Learner's IRS political targeting?
What did Barr do about the Las Vegas Massacre before he allowed that case to be closed?
What did Barr do about Loretta Lynch inciting violence after the 2016 election?
What did Barr do about ANTIFA and BLM riots?
What did Barr do about Hunter Biden's laptop?
What did Barr do to safeguard the 2020 election, and stop states from illegally changing voting laws?
What did Barr do with the Epstein case?
What did Barr do for Julian Assange- besides adding charges against an innocent journalist who is a political prisoner?
...I could easily continue.
What if the ET control must first be removed before lower echelon prosecutions can go forward? You must chop off the head to kill the beast, rather than nibbling its toes.
Durham will report on the outcomes for f the trials and plea deals he accepts. He won’t be filing report hoping Congress will take it and use it to impeach.
If Durham does his job, it doesn't matter. He has prosecutorial powers.
There is no “REPORt” there is only indictments coming :)
I think it wouldn't matter if it was Barr, or Garland. Both of those uniparty stooges would bury, deflect, marginalize, or diminish the Durham findings if given half a chance to do so. And I'm not entirely convinced that Durham himself wouldn't do the same.
Barr is definitely NOT the same thing as Garland. The only reason why Durham even exists is because Barr made him SC quietly before the election. He's informed of at least a part of the plan.
Barr also ended the Huber investigation, and transferred Huber's work to Barr's boy, Durham. The same Durham that should have dropped some bombs before the 2020 election. The same Durham that has so far declined to sentence one busted swamp criminal, and has charged another, Sussman, with the whopping criminal charge of lying.
It's 2022, and mid terms are almost here, and that's all we have got from Barr in the last 5 years. Exactly ZERO swamp rats are behind bars. Meanwhile, the USA continues along its dystopian course set by the uniparty, and with a new minister of disinformation who sings Mary Poppins to the peasants, as if citizens are children.
What did Barr do about Eric Holder's Fast&Furious gun running?
What did Barr do about Lois Learner's IRS political targeting?
What did Barr do about the Las Vegas Massacre before he allowed that case to be closed?
What did Barr do about Loretta Lynch inciting violence after the 2016 election?
What did Barr do about ANTIFA and BLM riots?
What did Barr do about Hunter Biden's laptop?
What did Barr do to safeguard the 2020 election, and stop states from illegally changing voting laws?
What did Barr do with the Epstein case?
What did Barr do for Julian Assange- besides adding charges against an innocent journalist who is a political prisoner?
...I could easily continue.
Barr is swamp garbage, just like Garland.
^^^THIS^^^
What if the ET control must first be removed before lower echelon prosecutions can go forward? You must chop off the head to kill the beast, rather than nibbling its toes.
Point taken, from head to toe, if there's to be peace, they must go.
Why would we want to arrest them one at a time when you can arrest and get ALL of them at a time?
Deep clean.
Durham will report on the outcomes for f the trials and plea deals he accepts. He won’t be filing report hoping Congress will take it and use it to impeach.
Remember when he was "this" close to become SCOTUS ? "Poor" guy used to come to DC and stick around for a hearing for a whole year.