I tried to link a whois lookup from ICANN but there isn't a direct link I can use so I looked it up on the terminal on my computer and sure enough, the information is correct.
Here it is:
[Querying whois.pir.org]
[whois.pir.org]
Domain Name: JEWISHRALLYFORABORTIONJUSTICE.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D402200000019622868-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
Updated Date: 2022-04-18T23:33:53Z
Creation Date: 2022-04-18T23:33:52Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2023-04-18T23:33:52Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: Tucows Domains Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: serverTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#serverTransferProhibited
Registrant Organization: Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0164199385
Registrant State/Province: ON
Registrant Country: CA
Name Server: DNS1.P05.NSONE.NET
Name Server: DNS2.P05.NSONE.NET
Name Server: DNS3.P05.NSONE.NET
Name Server: DNS4.P05.NSONE.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2022-05-04T09:45:28Z <<<
For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp
Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.
The Registrar of Record identified in this output may have an RDDS service that can be queried for additional information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
You may have to stretch the info by clicking on the lower right corner to expand, in order to make this readable (this is for desktop, not sure if possible on mobile, sorry).
So they were ahead of the curve on 9/11 too. But here is my Question. How many christian,s are still blind to this whole Israel good , everyone else bad shit.
Hold up, not ALL are broken....just the ones who cannot seem to know how to be one without getting "preached" how to be from Sunday to Sunday. Some of us are free thinkers who broke away from Religion; i.e. organized indoctrination.
I aint sayin all churches are bad, but finding a good one that doesn't preach off book, or worse cherry picks to twist a woke narrative, are getting harder to find. Reasons I just gave up a long time ago.
Reading the Word, digesting it, and thinking for yourself was around long before Q. Q just brought to mainstream what many have been doing on our own for years.
Probably had the website ready to go since they heard the case was going to SCOTUS. Don't read to heavy into it, they just pulled the trigger early, cuz of the leak
Okay, this is the 3rd posting of this same subject! Does anyone not read before posting? Just asking because yesterday we had around 30 postings regarding Roe vs. Wade. It gets to be annoying.
I did check before posting and couldn't find anything. I wasn't on earlier yesterday due to a power outage that lasted half a day and because I don't have an UPS to prevent my computer from shutting down unexpectedly, I didn't come on GAW until around 10 p.m due to me waiting it out to ensure there won't be another power outage after the first few.
I'm aware that there's 30+ postings on Roe v. Wade but none of them were related to what I posted.
I tried to link a whois lookup from ICANN but there isn't a direct link I can use so I looked it up on the terminal on my computer and sure enough, the information is correct.
Here it is:
You may have to stretch the info by clicking on the lower right corner to expand, in order to make this readable (this is for desktop, not sure if possible on mobile, sorry).
Additionally, here are the links to the tweet:
Nitter link to tweet
Direct link to tweet on Twatter
Ontario Canada eh? 🤔
So they were ahead of the curve on 9/11 too. But here is my Question. How many christian,s are still blind to this whole Israel good , everyone else bad shit.
Far FAR too many, no matter what I say or how much proof you show them!
Hold up, not ALL are broken....just the ones who cannot seem to know how to be one without getting "preached" how to be from Sunday to Sunday. Some of us are free thinkers who broke away from Religion; i.e. organized indoctrination.
I aint sayin all churches are bad, but finding a good one that doesn't preach off book, or worse cherry picks to twist a woke narrative, are getting harder to find. Reasons I just gave up a long time ago.
Reading the Word, digesting it, and thinking for yourself was around long before Q. Q just brought to mainstream what many have been doing on our own for years.
so what you are saying is... report the site for abuse. check
She’s a rabbi huh? Not really helping with the ol “blood libel”, is she?
Probably had the website ready to go since they heard the case was going to SCOTUS. Don't read to heavy into it, they just pulled the trigger early, cuz of the leak
edits in bold*
So, they are in support of keeping the right to abort Jewish babies?
They would just argue they made it in preparation for the decision being announced, not leaked.
Okay, this is the 3rd posting of this same subject! Does anyone not read before posting? Just asking because yesterday we had around 30 postings regarding Roe vs. Wade. It gets to be annoying.
I did check before posting and couldn't find anything. I wasn't on earlier yesterday due to a power outage that lasted half a day and because I don't have an UPS to prevent my computer from shutting down unexpectedly, I didn't come on GAW until around 10 p.m due to me waiting it out to ensure there won't be another power outage after the first few.
I'm aware that there's 30+ postings on Roe v. Wade but none of them were related to what I posted.
Thank you for your post.
Sorry, just venting!
Careful.. I'll promote you to MOD. 🐸
Ha ha!