I only pointed it out because Clif himself called it stealing in his early YouTube videos. He even said he copyrighted his name and image for this very reason. No harm done, I was just trying to help :)
If they are being stolen in that way, it's good to point it out. Quite right; many good content producers have their stuff ripped and exploited for personal gain, and that's not right.
So you were right to raise the issue. But I think in this case, it might not be the same. ...
He is smart but he wants us to know it and brings in waay too much information just to prove it. I could slim his one hour sessions down to 15 minutes of necessary info so I get annoyed with his attention seeking.
Sharing data gathering methodology and historical background is now considered attention seeking?
Apparently this is what woke universities have done to us. We can no longer sit patiently through a lecture and absorb relevant and necessary framing for the thorough understanding of information.
We really need to work on our attention spans as a society if a one hour lecture is too much for the average learner.
He doesn't like that Clif provides a lot of context and relevant info to the primary claims he is making.
When I play a game, I don't just stick to the main story line, I like doing side quests to get a more robust experience. Clif does that with his anecdotes and general way of approaching topics.
I think Clif's anecdotes are even more interesting than his core subject matter sometimes. I would pay good money for a 12 hour lecture series on what this man knows.
Meh. Maybe you're projecting a bit here? I think this is simply the way the man's mind works. When you listen to his background, you can see that he's got genius levels of mental work going on there. Which is not to say that everything he says is perfectly true or accurate.
I don't feel like it's attention seeking at all. Rather, he is detailed and meticulous and likes precision. I find him quite easy to listen to, because of these aspects.
This is a great interview. They cover a lot of ground through the course of the video.
I wish I could sit down with Clif and pick his brain about his data crunching tools. Really fascinating stuff.
Clif has said multiple times that he’s not on Rumble... he’s on Bitchute. Is this a counterfeit account?
Edit: This channel is not Clif and those videos are stolen. This is his channel https://www.bitchute.com/channel/HBBwqdoMy7Gz/
Seems like it now with all those reposts
Hmmm. Stolen?
A) no one is reposting these as their own
B) the name of the account is Clif High, so no one is taking credit away from Clif
C) It's not Yutub, so is anyone garnering advertising revenue from Clif's work?
Seems legit to me. At a minimum, if it's spreading the man's work, and not taking credit for it or profiting from it, is it 'stealing'?
PS. This is not a Clif High video, but actually an interview of CH by Greg hunter
I only pointed it out because Clif himself called it stealing in his early YouTube videos. He even said he copyrighted his name and image for this very reason. No harm done, I was just trying to help :)
If they are being stolen in that way, it's good to point it out. Quite right; many good content producers have their stuff ripped and exploited for personal gain, and that's not right.
So you were right to raise the issue. But I think in this case, it might not be the same. ...
I dont trust this guy.
You shouldn't trust anyone to the point where your own research and personal verification of information and data is nullified.
Always do your due diligence.
glad this is getting stickied. research who he is. pretty smart dude.
He is smart but he wants us to know it and brings in waay too much information just to prove it. I could slim his one hour sessions down to 15 minutes of necessary info so I get annoyed with his attention seeking.
Sharing data gathering methodology and historical background is now considered attention seeking?
Apparently this is what woke universities have done to us. We can no longer sit patiently through a lecture and absorb relevant and necessary framing for the thorough understanding of information.
We really need to work on our attention spans as a society if a one hour lecture is too much for the average learner.
He doesn't like that Clif provides a lot of context and relevant info to the primary claims he is making.
When I play a game, I don't just stick to the main story line, I like doing side quests to get a more robust experience. Clif does that with his anecdotes and general way of approaching topics.
I think Clif's anecdotes are even more interesting than his core subject matter sometimes. I would pay good money for a 12 hour lecture series on what this man knows.
Hell yeah! Sometimes he gives a side note and wills ay "but that's a topic for another time" and I'm like that woke NOOOOOOOOOOO meme
Meh. Maybe you're projecting a bit here? I think this is simply the way the man's mind works. When you listen to his background, you can see that he's got genius levels of mental work going on there. Which is not to say that everything he says is perfectly true or accurate.
I don't feel like it's attention seeking at all. Rather, he is detailed and meticulous and likes precision. I find him quite easy to listen to, because of these aspects.
I like him. Some here won't buy his parasite theory and what is,ultimately behind the 13 families, but it's an interesting idea and makes sense to me.