I think they were counting on the fbi (is ass ho) to lie for them. Why would they do that the dems lost and now they're busy trying to save there own asses. Sussman and company are fucked and they know it. Plea deal incoming to sell out Clinton and Obama incoming.
Doesn't matter what Kash tweets or Truths. What really matters is getting to the 12 Lib jurors and changing their minds that Sussman is innocent, like HRC. Rock solid evidence presented in a way that the jurors understand it and are not falling asleep while taking in the proceedings. You loose the jurors due to evidence overload and getting too knee deep into explanations and the jurors eyes will begin to glaze over and they will resent the prosecution team. Tread carefully, Durham.
Like a game of Chess?
I think one side is playing chess. The other...Chinese checkers?
The other side is finally having the curtain pulled away so their game of deceit is now, finally, getting exposed.
Just like the so-called Great and Powerful Wizard of Oz.
And they are fumbling to figure out what to play
The other side is playing Tiddlytwinks..I mean tiddlywinks.
The other sides thinks they are playing tic tac toe.
More like tiddlywinks.
Titlywinks.
Yesterday I think he said something about it being good to start at the bottom, with the implication that people will make deals.
Are they laying the groundwork ('setting the stage', in Q's words) for the Podesta announcement? (Q 34)
🙏🙏🙏🙏✝️✝️✝️✝️Lord Jesus, please make it so
Amen!
I think they were counting on the fbi (is ass ho) to lie for them. Why would they do that the dems lost and now they're busy trying to save there own asses. Sussman and company are fucked and they know it. Plea deal incoming to sell out Clinton and Obama incoming.
Game on, I thought it was game over!
...and in another direction, CBS News was just reporting, at some length, about Hunters business dealings and taxes.
Doesn't matter what Kash tweets or Truths. What really matters is getting to the 12 Lib jurors and changing their minds that Sussman is innocent, like HRC. Rock solid evidence presented in a way that the jurors understand it and are not falling asleep while taking in the proceedings. You loose the jurors due to evidence overload and getting too knee deep into explanations and the jurors eyes will begin to glaze over and they will resent the prosecution team. Tread carefully, Durham.
At school we were taught "it's going to lose its loose nut". Loose jurors?
All of this negative against FBI, not Sussman.
Sussman's defense is to blame the FBI. I still have seen no evidence of Sussman's lie.
Is it a lie because the evidence is fraudulent or that he got paid for it?
The lie part is that he told James Baker this. Correct? And the main evidence for it is James Baker's testimony to it.
he/said she/said type of thing, right?