What was the full title of Charles Darwin's "origin of species" ?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Of course he was a racist. Without an eye for racial differences it cannot be gauged what the contributing factors are for survival, procreation and gene-heridity.
But I bet, most of those here have never read his book, and simply have no clue what they are talking about.
Comparing a 1910 biplane with the horten-229 and the B2 bomber clearly shows the artificial process. Quite an evolution, is it not?
Or how about comparing a musket with an ar-15. Quite an evolution, is it not?
This process can be observed in all instrumentalities of man.
We even accept these process in plants and dogs, cats, horses, cows etc. Where do you smart-asses think doberman, rotweiler, husky, etc come from? God did not make them. Man made them as they bread for certain favored characteristics. Artificial selection.
With death, drought, heavy rains, warmth, cold, abundace of food or lack thereof, Nature excerts the same kind of power. Natural selection.
The comparison is simple and elegant and quite fitting.
But go ahead. Shoot yourself in the foot.
Starts as plane. Ends as plane.
Starts as gun. Ends as gun.
Starts as cat. Ends as cat.
Starts as dog. Ends as dog.
Trillions of observations by billions of people over thousands of years tell us that life forms are fixed.
Evolution is a lie.
Your confusing evolution with metamorphosis This isn't pokemon...
Yeah, and an icecream starts as such and ends up like shit.
Exactly. Entropy.
I am glad you are happy with keeping and bearing arms : enjoy your musket. Or is your musket already subject to entropy and turned into an AR-15? Which one would you prefer?
We have observations of evolution. The ancient auroch found across all of Europe is the ancestor of all domesticated cattle species today.
Species adapting to the part of the earth they are on is NOT what the “theory of evolution” teaches. Species don’t change, they stay in their “animal family” and don’t switch when enough time has passed.
The auroch was in general a cow. Even a child can see that.
That's where people fail when they try to debunk Noah's ark. The Bible said there were examples of each "kind" of animal. In other words, there were two "cats" which could later expand in the multitude of varieties we have today.
A "kind" is not the same as a species.
This
Learn the difference between micro and macro.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution. The process behind “micro” and “macro” evolution are the same. The only change is the time scale.
Apologist for the anti-humans. I am sure they will give you extra chocolate rations if you are a real good boy.
Am I in luck. Chocolate is not.my schtick and I am too bad failing for.good.