You are catching on. Look at the spin that's being spun here it's incredible. Just last week everybody was going boom about this being an amazing win when Durham gets the job done. These explanations never seem to come out two days before the the verdict. It is always after something does not go our way that they come up with these supposedly plausible explanations about how this is a win for us. Nonsense
I don’t know, the community I was following on YouTube that was purchasing the transcripts and going through them were talking about swamp corruption from the first day, back when they were doing jury review. Once the Clinton donors were allowed to stay on the jury, a lot of people thought the fix was in. From that point there started to be rumblings that the prosecution wasn’t always objecting or challenging in places where they could, and there’s still this weird element of the case where they had Sussman lying in text on the 18th, but instead charged him for the 19th, where they had no text.
By the second week I started to get the sense this trial wasn’t really about Sussman. Part of that was this idea that Sussman lied to the FBI. Part of believing that also requires you to believe that the FBI was duped, when really we know the FBI was in on it. So it felt strange to cheer for a guilty verdict which would legally confirm the FBI was duped, when I don’t think that’s what actually happened.
I dunno. I seem to recall reading more than a few win-win regardless posts last week. A lot of them were being drowned out by the cheering section and duplicate posts.
You are catching on. Look at the spin that's being spun here it's incredible. Just last week everybody was going boom about this being an amazing win when Durham gets the job done. These explanations never seem to come out two days before the the verdict. It is always after something does not go our way that they come up with these supposedly plausible explanations about how this is a win for us. Nonsense
I don’t know, the community I was following on YouTube that was purchasing the transcripts and going through them were talking about swamp corruption from the first day, back when they were doing jury review. Once the Clinton donors were allowed to stay on the jury, a lot of people thought the fix was in. From that point there started to be rumblings that the prosecution wasn’t always objecting or challenging in places where they could, and there’s still this weird element of the case where they had Sussman lying in text on the 18th, but instead charged him for the 19th, where they had no text.
By the second week I started to get the sense this trial wasn’t really about Sussman. Part of that was this idea that Sussman lied to the FBI. Part of believing that also requires you to believe that the FBI was duped, when really we know the FBI was in on it. So it felt strange to cheer for a guilty verdict which would legally confirm the FBI was duped, when I don’t think that’s what actually happened.
BOOM!
This. If you read more than sticky posts, there was analysis going on about not having a win still being good for Team MAGA before the verdict.
I read more than a few win-win posts, they just got drowned out by the cheering section.
I dunno. I seem to recall reading more than a few win-win regardless posts last week. A lot of them were being drowned out by the cheering section and duplicate posts.
The spin is real. It is always trying to reason why we HAD to lose something.
When the victory never comes, and the people keep spinning, nothing ever gets done.
Sometimes you just need to take something at face value, instead of trying to cope hard.
Future proves past.
I'll believe it when someone's convicted and swinging.