If you find yourself being one of the brainwashed "anons" who genuinely think homosexuality, trans whatever, and the rest of the movement is a good and natural thing, then ask yourself some simple questions.
-
Does the DS promote it or condone it?
-
Is being straight promoted as normal and good for society? No.
-
Is being gay promoted as normal and good for society? Yes.
-
Is the nuclear family promoted? No.
-
Does the government promote wholesome family values? No.
-
Does the government promote disgusting pedos dressed as demons to read to your children about trans shit? Yes.
-
Does the government extort your children's education by withholding funding if the school does not promote it's degenerate homosexual policies? Yes.
-
Are you free to criticize straight people and the nuclear family? Yes.
-
Are you free to criticize homosexuals and the varying levels of "family" that they promote as normal? No.
-
Are corporations run or owned by filth around the world promoting the degeneracy? Yes.
Well then you have your answer.
I'm gay and pragmatically I don't think it's either a 'good' or 'natural' thing; just like lots of other things; but I don't live in doleful contrition. Feel free to ask questions of a 'live' one whilst I'm online here 🙂
There's really nothing I need to ask you lol. The movement is toxic to society it's as simple as that. Now if you want to argue that you and another dude wanna do whatever in your home then that's your business. I don't care about that.
But other then that, I think it immediately becomes a problem the second it's outside of that box.
For example. I don't think children should be adopted to homosexual couples. I think it's robbing them of essentials. Especially if straight couples or single male/female are available as they can potentially provide the the other half of the equation later.
I don't think the lifestyle should be taught to children in schools.
I also think society should be free to research it to see if it's a mental health disorder, chemical issue or parasites that cause the attraction to same sex or both sexes. Notice I am not arguing with you on your attraction to the same sex. I do genuinely believe you are gay and that it is a real thing. I just don't believe any inherent good comes out of it for society as a whole.
Unfortunately, with your lifestyle has come a sort of a Pandora's Box. When the door was opened for you, everything else came with it and I don't think that's arguable.
And really the final factor is that your lifestyle is at the forefront of the DS pushes onto the world. We know their evil by nature.
Now imagine if they were to push straight families with lots of children. What would they accomplish? Only good.
You see where I'm going with this?
You said it yourself in the last sentence of the first paragraph, and many thanks for that 🙂 other than to, perhaps semantically say, you wouldn't need to 'argue' it with me.
I've no issue with your other views, more so I'm grateful you're getting to express them. They are yours and if we don't have free speech then we have nothing, and goodness knows how much censorship is going down around us. I do agree actually that 'gay marriage' was a tipping point too far. The reforms etc aimed at everyday tolerance and anti-discrimination up to that point, were in my opinion, perfectly adequate and didn't need to go any further, borne out I would say empirically by the fact that society plodded along well and discreetly enough with them for a good few subsequent years.
The only one thing I'd contest though is the emphasis of my assumed 'lifestyle'. I do know what you mean as a generalisation, honestly I'm not looking to be pedantic over that. Just I would like to say though that I and lots of others are of the 'keep ourselves to ourselves' variety, always have been always will be. I'm as perturbed as you are at the explosion of 'promotion' and especially downright INFILTRATION that has been perniciously injected into the output of all factions of public agnecies in latter years. Coincides with a certain OBASTURD getting 'elected', it seems to me. Funny that.
See that's the thing with me personally. I know there are lots of hardcore religious folk who just don't want it to exist and I can understand some of their grievances.
But for personally it is the promotion of LGBTQ and the simultaneous destruction of the nuclear family.
The other thing is, although if may be "infiltration", you have to ask yourself why they use that particular lifestyle and movement as one of their main weapons.
Is it because it brings good to the world or because it is inherently something that is rotten?
And the above line is why I think it should be allowed to be studied freely. But that type of conversation goes heavily into what parasites are and their relation to religious topics.
It is quite frankly becoming natural because the cabal is forcing it. They are hormonally changing us via foods we eat. We are eating massive amounts of phyto estrogens. Which is causing issues in Men and Women downstream. It happens in obese populations more..admittedly....but guess what. Half the country is fat. Milk is one of the largest reasons for hormonal imbalance because of how cows process the phyto estrogens themselves. Men have less testosterone, and are too busy to take care of themselves. Too busy being shit on by society, and by social media claiming anything they do besides video games is toxic masculinity. I agree, the lifestyle is very much so being promoted over the "nuclear family". But I dont blame gay people for being gay. Because quite frankly. In alot of the older more developed adults. It is simply who they are.
Thanks Kim, I do appreciate the measured response. Like we're both saying in a similar way, one has to decide which hills we would die on, and absolute freedom of speech is mine. No way should anyone ever be oppressed from constructing an argument or debate, as dialetic has got us where we are. Take that away and we're all automatically reduced to nothing, ne plus ultra.
About the 'promotion' of LGB blah blah blah (it's so interminable to me), correct me if I'm assuming wrong but I guess you're American (purely because the vast majority of the forum is). In which case, you may wish to look into the UK history of our infamous 'Section 28', which was basically our British libtard's 80s "don't say gay" of the day. Of course it was handy material to bash our greatest ever Premier, Margaret Thatcher with, by the process of Marxist attrition that had already been silently planted and instituted. Even as a kid, and a 'gay' one at that, I had enough nous about me to differentiate that it was promoting tolerance and anti-discrimination of LGB in a neutral way, ie, in the classroom just don't make a big thing of it if questions are asked, then move on. As opposed to the other way round 'oppression' the Flaming lot painted it as, funded of course by the burgeoning Arse, sorry Arts Councils etc.
Are you saying gays suck?
Thanks for presenting yourself to the community. I hope you don't get discouraged by any rude comments from others.
When you have some spare time, please peek at this and let us know what you think may be true or false. Parasite Pill 👈 Don't read if you've eaten recently.
Do you know of anyone in your community that has ever been "cured" of homosexuality?
These are honest questions, I have a gay nephew that sadly was ostracized from the family and I'm just hopeful that our communities / families can be united some day.
Hey, cheers!!
I've never 'hidden' it as such here, but Kim asked about it outright tonight, so I offered a perspective. I feel Kim has responded in kind and am grateful.
No-one's been rude as far as I'm concerned. GAW is truly one the last bastions of freedom of speech fora left.
I don't know of anyone 'cured' personally no, but I shall look at your link in the morning, and then if I feel I can reply worthwhile, I will 🙂
Mike.
I'm what's known as an asshole around here. Mods hate me but I think I bring up lots of discussion others don't want to lmao
Good Day, just curious if you had some time to review the Parasite Pill PDF and what you thought could be accurate or BS.
Thanks in advance!
I have had a cursory browse and must say, thank you so much to digest (pardon the pun) there. What leaps out at me with most celerity is the 'Define Mental Health' section, and not being able to deny knowing that on the practically atomic level, tardigrade 'hooker' type parasites exist, always have, always will. And are likely the biotic trigger for each interminable cycle of 'human civilisation' we 'evolve' but then eventually spectacularly fuck up with our sheer arrogance.
I appreciate your response.
Maybe I've been to scribd too many times, but it's asking me to upload stuff before I can download anything.
Here is an archived version: Parasite Pill
I have a question for you if you don't mind answering. A little of my background... I lived in California for several years (great state, wonderful, creative people) and knew many gays, some - colleagues and neighbors - who were good friends. They would give me the shirt off their back and I would do the same for them, wouldn't hesitate for a moment to drop everything if they needed a favor. They weren't my friends because they're gay, but because they're just good people. Some were single, others married and/or devoted to their partner and none of them would be okay with pedophilia nor did they support the freak shows of the pride parades, etc. I'm religious myself, but believe I was not put on this earth to judge anyone who does not harm another human being. God will judge us all when our day is come and we all have things to atone for.
My question for you is this, if you don't mind answering, and I mean no offense by it. Hypothetically, if it's determined that, for example, the DS had "done something" (vaccines, chemical additives in food, etc) to deliberately influence young people's gender identity, so to speak, and there was some kind of "cure" which an LGB could take to make them "straight" - would you take it? Let's say society has evolved and the child groomers-pedophiles have been eradicated and there would be no ramifications either way for one's choice in the matter (nobody would think better or worse of you no matter your choice) - would you take a "cure"? I know you're just one guy with an opinion, but I'm just curious. (I didn't watch the above link, BTW).
Thank you, you've obviously put a lot of thought into this. I particularly appreciate your testimony in the first paragraph.
I'll answer your question in two stages.
One, I'll "come out" and say that I do think the DS has indeed 'done something' to cause this insane plunge into the 'QT+' aspect of it over a certain period of time. And I'll swear to it again and again, the beginnings of it coincides with the 'election' of a certain SATANIC CUNT OBSATURD. This UTTER CRAP that is so prevalent now is MENTAL MADNESS being perpetrated by the GROOMERS that DEMON deliberately cultivated.
Two, even with all that EVIL taken out, no I wouldn't want to be 'cured' and made 'straight'. I'm a simple guy living a simple life, with the same partner I've had for the last 25 years, I've no interest in seeking 'sexual adventure', I just want to be left alone to live life as a conservative who has this one trait but otherwise lives the lifestyle we all here seem to like.