Then why has it been presented as the last bastion of free speech? They specifically said people wouldn't be getting banned for sharing their opinions, whether it was leftist or rightist. And that's exactly how it should be.
Why would they go back on it, especially when it's believed that TS is a big piece of the puzzle?
All it does it make them look like liars with ulterior motives. It's absolutely not going to help the movement.
It's a for profit company it's not going to cater to your every need. And even if they did promote complete free speech it would be littered with junk and you'd lose interest.
This is the way the world works. They need to make money while remaining available on the major platforms.
Then why has it been presented as the last bastion of free speech? They specifically said people wouldn't be getting banned for sharing their opinions, whether it was leftist or rightist. And that's exactly how it should be.
Why would they go back on it, especially when it's believed that TS is a big piece of the puzzle?
All it does it make them look like liars with ulterior motives. It's absolutely not going to help the movement.
It's a for profit company it's not going to cater to your every need. And even if they did promote complete free speech it would be littered with junk and you'd lose interest.
This is the way the world works. They need to make money while remaining available on the major platforms.
It's not going to make a profit if people don't like what they are seeing.
Trying to minimize and rationalize is retardism.
But her views are not junk.