Is that an honest question about the evolutionary biology that created minds with the advantage of grouping like things to allow organisms to live and to survive in a world where grouping items/things/people has positive effects on safe food selection, genetic mating benefits and literally thousands of other pattern recognition positives that stem from the trait you appear to be bemoaning?
Here's a better question: why do you want to fag over this obama when I say I wish I never heard about an obama? I don't care about some jerkoff Kenyan half-brother to a president who continues to perpetuate the deep state and empower satanic cabal plans for this nation. This guy is a joke whose fame stems from the fame of someone even worse than he is. He is a parasite and bottom feeder who goes for cheap fame instead of trenchant political contributions.
Do you have a family? Have you heard of a family? That is a group.
Have you ever played on a sports team? Are you aware that sports teams exist? That is a group.
Have you ever talked about redheads, or Republicans, or do you simply look at humans as blank, featureless masses devoid of individual characteristics?
Do you refuse to recognize the boundaries of nations? Of towns? Those are groups of people. Do you refuse to recognize that people belong to the religions that they profess? They are grouping themselves. Etc. etc. etc. etc etc.
Once again, your point is moot, however, since I did not say that one member of the family is equivalent to another. Just that both would be better off never heard from.
“While the individual man is an insoluble puzzle, in the aggregate he becomes a mathematical certainty. You can, for example, never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to. Individuals vary, but the percentages remain constant.”
Yes. I use literacy in my thought process to decode the words of others. For instance, reading my words you would see that I didn’t say he’s as bad as Obama I said his fame stems from a bad thing (the presidency of his half brother) and I wish it had not occurred.
They aren’t the same people though. Is it so hard to individualize our thoughts?
What is the human obsession to group everything.
Is that an honest question about the evolutionary biology that created minds with the advantage of grouping like things to allow organisms to live and to survive in a world where grouping items/things/people has positive effects on safe food selection, genetic mating benefits and literally thousands of other pattern recognition positives that stem from the trait you appear to be bemoaning?
Here's a better question: why do you want to fag over this obama when I say I wish I never heard about an obama? I don't care about some jerkoff Kenyan half-brother to a president who continues to perpetuate the deep state and empower satanic cabal plans for this nation. This guy is a joke whose fame stems from the fame of someone even worse than he is. He is a parasite and bottom feeder who goes for cheap fame instead of trenchant political contributions.
You are correct about pattern recognition.
In database design.
We have
one to one one to many many to many relationships.
I create software for a living. I understand the benefits of labeling things.
Grouping people is something I just never do. Simple because people are too complex and different to use grouping successfully.
Do you have a family? Have you heard of a family? That is a group.
Have you ever played on a sports team? Are you aware that sports teams exist? That is a group.
Have you ever talked about redheads, or Republicans, or do you simply look at humans as blank, featureless masses devoid of individual characteristics?
Do you refuse to recognize the boundaries of nations? Of towns? Those are groups of people. Do you refuse to recognize that people belong to the religions that they profess? They are grouping themselves. Etc. etc. etc. etc etc.
Once again, your point is moot, however, since I did not say that one member of the family is equivalent to another. Just that both would be better off never heard from.
Sherlock Holmes to Watson:
“While the individual man is an insoluble puzzle, in the aggregate he becomes a mathematical certainty. You can, for example, never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to. Individuals vary, but the percentages remain constant.”
You and I just have different thought processes.
I tend to individualize my thoughts when it comes to people. I organize people by their names.
I don't assoicate what one similar person does with what another similar person does.
I am not saying you are wrong. I just don't think the same when it comes to people.
Yes. I use literacy in my thought process to decode the words of others. For instance, reading my words you would see that I didn’t say he’s as bad as Obama I said his fame stems from a bad thing (the presidency of his half brother) and I wish it had not occurred.
You said
" I didn't have to even think about anything any Kenyan says."
Why mention Kenyan at all? What is the significance of it?