Trump releases 12 page letter detailing the 2020 fraud and confirms devolution. This man will not be stopped. Thank heavens.
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
From Patel Patriot: I got so excited I forgot to even reference what I'm talking about. Trump's official spokeswoman, Liz Harrington, released a 12 page letter from Trump.
It's one big ass devolution-proof.
What about that letter is proof of devolution?
It does not prove or disprove.
I've read the devolution series, but honestly I think after the eighth segment, you can begin to see confirmation bias in Patel Patriots' series. He desperately wants his theory to be true, so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.
Here is a little thought exercise:
I could go on and on, and when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this. I have a lot of respect for Mike Lindell, he is risking everything he has in order to fix this.
Perhaps the end goal is for the majority to wake up to the fact that no one else has your and your loved ones' interest at heart, for only then will you be motivated to do something about the predicament we're collectively in.
Edit: Judging by the responses, it is clear that many got the impression that I had concluded that Dave, Patel Patriot and General Flynn have sinister motivations. That's not true, I merely posed hard questions, to which I have no definitive answers, that's why I said it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing things.
Attacking someone for asking uncomfortable questions that challenge your own interpretations of things by immediately calling them doomers or shills is no different than the left's name calling.
Humans are complex creatures, on any given issue, we fall into a spectrum of opinions in a Bell curve distribution pattern. You can't expect everyone to see things the way you do, and if the right-leaning platforms start banning people for saying things that don't exactly match their stance, then they are also no better than Twitter or Facebook. We don't want this to become an echo chamber. Just my opinion here.
You bring up some interesting points, but your educated guessing is no different from all the folks you listed. And I'm sorry, we can snuff out Paytriots rather easily, in fact we made a sport of it for a time. I can see and agree with confirmation bias, but only from a point of good faith. They se guys want it to be true because it's good for everyone if it is. Same can be said of us in this group. Yeah we get a little carried away, but the intentions are mostly good (not so much from those who want a theocracy).
It's also possible your interpretation is dead ass wrong. I think a lot of people want to fix it, they just have different ideas about doing it. I myself think it was pure stupidity to go in unarmed January 6th. Not because they should have been using their guns in a threatening manner, but because it sends a statement loud and clear that we won't be manipulated. But everyone decided to follow local infringement protocol and now some of them are rotting in jail. Go figure.
My point is, your interpretation isn't the correct one. And while you ask hard questions, your answers aren't the right ones. It's still anyone's guess, though mathematically speaking there is plenty of reason to accept there is a plan or rather plans.
Noice rebuttal.
Second.