Trump releases 12 page letter detailing the 2020 fraud and confirms devolution. This man will not be stopped. Thank heavens.
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
From Patel Patriot: I got so excited I forgot to even reference what I'm talking about. Trump's official spokeswoman, Liz Harrington, released a 12 page letter from Trump.
It's one big ass devolution-proof.
It does not prove or disprove.
I've read the devolution series, but honestly I think after the eighth segment, you can begin to see confirmation bias in Patel Patriots' series. He desperately wants his theory to be true, so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.
Here is a little thought exercise:
I could go on and on, and when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this. I have a lot of respect for Mike Lindell, he is risking everything he has in order to fix this.
Perhaps the end goal is for the majority to wake up to the fact that no one else has your and your loved ones' interest at heart, for only then will you be motivated to do something about the predicament we're collectively in.
Edit: Judging by the responses, it is clear that many got the impression that I had concluded that Dave, Patel Patriot and General Flynn have sinister motivations. That's not true, I merely posed hard questions, to which I have no definitive answers, that's why I said it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing things.
Attacking someone for asking uncomfortable questions that challenge your own interpretations of things by immediately calling them doomers or shills is no different than the left's name calling.
Humans are complex creatures, on any given issue, we fall into a spectrum of opinions in a Bell curve distribution pattern. You can't expect everyone to see things the way you do, and if the right-leaning platforms start banning people for saying things that don't exactly match their stance, then they are also no better than Twitter or Facebook. We don't want this to become an echo chamber. Just my opinion here.
You bring up some interesting points, but your educated guessing is no different from all the folks you listed. And I'm sorry, we can snuff out Paytriots rather easily, in fact we made a sport of it for a time. I can see and agree with confirmation bias, but only from a point of good faith. They se guys want it to be true because it's good for everyone if it is. Same can be said of us in this group. Yeah we get a little carried away, but the intentions are mostly good (not so much from those who want a theocracy).
It's also possible your interpretation is dead ass wrong. I think a lot of people want to fix it, they just have different ideas about doing it. I myself think it was pure stupidity to go in unarmed January 6th. Not because they should have been using their guns in a threatening manner, but because it sends a statement loud and clear that we won't be manipulated. But everyone decided to follow local infringement protocol and now some of them are rotting in jail. Go figure.
My point is, your interpretation isn't the correct one. And while you ask hard questions, your answers aren't the right ones. It's still anyone's guess, though mathematically speaking there is plenty of reason to accept there is a plan or rather plans.
Noice rebuttal.
Second.
The “UglyTruth” is that his account is just over one month old, lol
And zero posts. A total non-contributing zero.
I thought something was fishy as I was reading his post. It is possible to write a bunch of bullshit and make it sound plausible.
As opposed to institutions like the New York Times, where writes a bunch of bullshit but is still unable to make it sound plausible.
I think this board has been rather lousy at sniffing out Paytriots. My original account was BANNED for calling out "George News" as bull shit.
I am sure many who were here a year ago remember all the drama surrounding the topic.
Meanwhile we have Lin and Powell and Flynn and Lindell and many others feuding with each other... for no other reason than SOMEONE being a swindler... but no one can really identify who... or maybe none of them are, but there is so much paranoia that they all suspect each other.
Either way, I don't trust anyone at the moment.
This stuff is so controlled and contrived you have to willingly not see it.
Here is a little thought exercise:
present us with things he has ignored than disprove him rather than simply arguing everyone is in it for money.
these are talented people. there's much more lucrative things they could be doing than selling out their country for a few extra dollars.
What you’re saying is possible but it’s going on the assumption that greed drives these people. That may or may not be the case.
A more interesting point is the downfall/potential downfall of capitalism. Man’s love for money will always be the root of all evil. But will all men chose money over morals? Dunno but I do know even the “honest” businessman who chooses to put their clients needs above exorbitant profits will eventually get bought out by said greedy corps. So possibly moot point.
It's not man's love for money that is the root of all evil, it is man's love for anything but himself and his neighbor, with trust in God.
Money is a tool, as much as a spear, screwdriver, or rifle are.
But a man that obsesses over his power unto others - or his rifle, his trophy wife, his pile of silver or gold - will do all manner of evil things to maintain a dominion on what has caught his eye.
Man is most evil when he is the furthest from another man. Inhuman, if you allow my literary flourish.
I'd be willing to bet most don't think it will be fixed at all. I disagree.
Wanting it fixed and believing it will be are two different thing.
I agree ONLY with your last paragraph
Well, yes/no.
Ugly, but not a lot of truth.
Note: "a devolution proof", "a Q proof"
In these expressions, the meaning of the word "proof' is not the same as "the evidence 'proves' that the defendant is guilty".
Every where "Q proof" is used, aka the context shows that here, "proof" means "evidence". As in, this is evidence that X is true. "This item is evidence that Q+ is DJT", for example.
The term "evidence" is used mostly in a legal context. A case is "proven" when the accumulation of evidence amounts to "proof". In criminal cases, in the US, the standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt".
So, when you say "This letter does not prove or disprove", you either misunderstand the meaning of the statement "It's one big ass devolution-proof", or you are being disingenuous. I'll assume the former.
Saying "this is a devolution proof" is quite different, for the reasons outlined above, from saying "this proves devolution".
If you assert that the OP is saying "this proves devolution", that's a misreading or a false argument. In fact, Op is saying "this letter is evidence towards proving devolution" and is implying that "this can be included with other pieces of evidence pointing to that determination".
Yes, the title says "confirms" which means, to the OP, the accumulated evidence is to confirm it, but that's a subjective standard, so yeah, there is room to disagree there. Everyone's threshold for "enough evidence for me to believe or accept X premise" is different.
A personal comment: What a shame to live life with the attitude: "the only motivation for me to do something about my (our) predicament is when I accept that no one else cares about my and mine".
Frankly, I'm MORE inspired to do something about my (our) predicament when I realize, I'm not alone, and that others also care. I have millions of people around the world who feel exactly the same way, and there are real champions who also care about this, and about me and mine, not to mention God and Christ, who care about me as well.
This creates the solidarity that defeats the "divide and conquer" strategy of the enemy. "no one else cares about me/mine" plays into that strategy big time.
In my view, the motivation derived from knowing there are millions who actually care about me and mine as much as their own, including many champions on the stage, such as DJT, is 1000 times more powerful than the belief that no one else gives a sh*t about me or my loved ones.
But maybe that's just me.
Carry on.
Posing questions about strangers inner motivations then providing sinister answers and implying those sinister answers are the correct answers is self revelatory.
Rather than being concerned about the motivations of others, perhaps figure out your own motivations.
He desperately wants it to be true because he makes about $36k a month on his substack.