451
posted ago by Factfiler ago by Factfiler +451 / -0

From Patel Patriot: I got so excited I forgot to even reference what I'm talking about. Trump's official spokeswoman, Liz Harrington, released a 12 page letter from Trump.

It's one big ass devolution-proof.

https://tinyurl.com/vtk38yba

Comments (152)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
52
AZTrumpette1776 52 points ago +61 / -9

What about that letter is proof of devolution?

15
UglyTruths 15 points ago +40 / -25

It does not prove or disprove.

I've read the devolution series, but honestly I think after the eighth segment, you can begin to see confirmation bias in Patel Patriots' series. He desperately wants his theory to be true, so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.

Here is a little thought exercise:

  1. If you were Dave of X22, would you rather have the country fixed up overnight or would you rather the current situation gets prolonged? Selling hopium is good business I heard.
  2. If you were Patel Patriot, you see donations keep coming in for the series, would you rather be proven right immediately or just point out enough ambiguous clues to keep the readers engaged and donations coming?
  3. If you were General Flynn, would you rather have Trump reinstated as president or have the current situation keep going and charge hefty speaking fees? (And the prospect of a presidential run in 2024.)

I could go on and on, and when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this. I have a lot of respect for Mike Lindell, he is risking everything he has in order to fix this.

Perhaps the end goal is for the majority to wake up to the fact that no one else has your and your loved ones' interest at heart, for only then will you be motivated to do something about the predicament we're collectively in.

Edit: Judging by the responses, it is clear that many got the impression that I had concluded that Dave, Patel Patriot and General Flynn have sinister motivations. That's not true, I merely posed hard questions, to which I have no definitive answers, that's why I said it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing things.

Attacking someone for asking uncomfortable questions that challenge your own interpretations of things by immediately calling them doomers or shills is no different than the left's name calling.

Humans are complex creatures, on any given issue, we fall into a spectrum of opinions in a Bell curve distribution pattern. You can't expect everyone to see things the way you do, and if the right-leaning platforms start banning people for saying things that don't exactly match their stance, then they are also no better than Twitter or Facebook. We don't want this to become an echo chamber. Just my opinion here.

29
GoingCamaro 29 points ago +31 / -2

You bring up some interesting points, but your educated guessing is no different from all the folks you listed. And I'm sorry, we can snuff out Paytriots rather easily, in fact we made a sport of it for a time. I can see and agree with confirmation bias, but only from a point of good faith. They se guys want it to be true because it's good for everyone if it is. Same can be said of us in this group. Yeah we get a little carried away, but the intentions are mostly good (not so much from those who want a theocracy).

when you go through them with an honest and unbiased assessment, you realize that it is possible that only a few individuals are actually serious about fixing this

It's also possible your interpretation is dead ass wrong. I think a lot of people want to fix it, they just have different ideas about doing it. I myself think it was pure stupidity to go in unarmed January 6th. Not because they should have been using their guns in a threatening manner, but because it sends a statement loud and clear that we won't be manipulated. But everyone decided to follow local infringement protocol and now some of them are rotting in jail. Go figure.

My point is, your interpretation isn't the correct one. And while you ask hard questions, your answers aren't the right ones. It's still anyone's guess, though mathematically speaking there is plenty of reason to accept there is a plan or rather plans.

12
FractalizingIron 12 points ago +12 / -0

Noice rebuttal.

8
FrankieBiglips 8 points ago +8 / -0

Second.

11
Metalheads4Trump 11 points ago +11 / -0

The “UglyTruth” is that his account is just over one month old, lol

6
FatReggie 6 points ago +8 / -2

And zero posts. A total non-contributing zero.

4
damessinger 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought something was fishy as I was reading his post. It is possible to write a bunch of bullshit and make it sound plausible.

7
WhiteHouseDog 7 points ago +8 / -1

I think this board has been rather lousy at sniffing out Paytriots. My original account was BANNED for calling out "George News" as bull shit.

I am sure many who were here a year ago remember all the drama surrounding the topic.

Meanwhile we have Lin and Powell and Flynn and Lindell and many others feuding with each other... for no other reason than SOMEONE being a swindler... but no one can really identify who... or maybe none of them are, but there is so much paranoia that they all suspect each other.

Either way, I don't trust anyone at the moment.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

This stuff is so controlled and contrived you have to willingly not see it.

11
Badgertime33 11 points ago +11 / -0

so he looks for things that confirm his theory while ignoring other things that might disprove him.

Here is a little thought exercise:

present us with things he has ignored than disprove him rather than simply arguing everyone is in it for money.

these are talented people. there's much more lucrative things they could be doing than selling out their country for a few extra dollars.

4
Cpleb 4 points ago +4 / -0

What you’re saying is possible but it’s going on the assumption that greed drives these people. That may or may not be the case.

A more interesting point is the downfall/potential downfall of capitalism. Man’s love for money will always be the root of all evil. But will all men chose money over morals? Dunno but I do know even the “honest” businessman who chooses to put their clients needs above exorbitant profits will eventually get bought out by said greedy corps. So possibly moot point.

4
Ausernamegoeshere 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not man's love for money that is the root of all evil, it is man's love for anything but himself and his neighbor, with trust in God.

Money is a tool, as much as a spear, screwdriver, or rifle are.

But a man that obsesses over his power unto others - or his rifle, his trophy wife, his pile of silver or gold - will do all manner of evil things to maintain a dominion on what has caught his eye.

Man is most evil when he is the furthest from another man. Inhuman, if you allow my literary flourish.

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd be willing to bet most don't think it will be fixed at all. I disagree.

Wanting it fixed and believing it will be are two different thing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
populist_nationalist 7 points ago +42 / -35

I read it. Not one word made me think devolution. Patel Patriot is really grasping at straws to keep this shit up now.

55
I-AM-ANON 55 points ago +69 / -14

Really? A twelve page letter detailing how the election was outright stolen & that there is institutional capture within our local & state court systems didn’t give you the idea that there is a hardened contingent within our Republic that is engaged in civil war with another one?

Honestly if you are in these comments posting takes like this after having read an open letter that directly accuses the democrats of treason, is headed by ‘President Donald J Trump’ - contains the clear cut quote “we won on November 3rd,” - and ends with NCSWIC paraphrased, I petition for you to be banned. At this point it’s clear that dooming is a sort of addiction among the pessimistic here and you’re either better off getting booted and being a lurker to prompt you to focus on pulling your own life together, or youre a deliberate shill.

23
deleted 23 points ago +28 / -5
11
The_Knight_of_sunset 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump really did his homework with this letter. Bibliography, citations, laying out the facts in a clear and precise manner that is not hard on the eyes, the whole nine yards!

Should be recommended reading for everyone on the side of Trump and America!

5
Greekish 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Rumors circulated that the Justices devolved to shouting"

This word made me think of devolution.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
JessWithTheMess 6 points ago +14 / -8

You want him banned... for not agreeing with you? God, help this forum. Not to mention Devolution isn’t even a Q prediction! You guys are acting like Q went away and left y’all in charge... He’s not a shill and people like you are what is pushing anons away from places like this. This is exactly what I’m talking about. Treating skeptics or even berating doomers like shills, and then when their predictions come true, you are quieter than a church mouse, explaining why this loss is actually a win in disguise.

7
TheNewsCommenter 7 points ago +7 / -0

“You can’t tell them, you have to show them” is Q’s repeated nod to devolution. Patel (Jon) mentions Q only in that he says none of his work is based on it and finds it interesting that it just happens to line up.

4
GreenLivesMatter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not that I agree with the banning part, but COG/Devolution would be run by the military, no? And GITMO is where we put foreign terrorists/prisoners of war. Both talked about by Q.

2
I-AM-ANON 2 points ago +3 / -1

No, I want doomers who INSIST on pessimism to be banned, because they are not productive to discussion. When Trump literally signs off with NCSWIC and people get up in the thread with “myh expectations of drastic overnight change” and start detracting from the CLEAR Q proofs present in comms, it’s time to hit the ban. After all the HUNDREDS OF PROOFS you’ve seen if you are on the forum bitching it up about timetables, yes, it’s time to free up the comment feed for persons who are capable of ON TOPIC DISCUSSION.

1
10122046 1 point ago +1 / -0

Targeted Misinfo in an Info war is an assault.

4
Murphy71 4 points ago +4 / -0

Awesome rant. Well said.

3
Make_It_So 3 points ago +4 / -1

Everything you said is spot on. Except for the ban petition. That was silly, but I get your frustration with the smooth brains.

1
I-AM-ANON 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m just saying, a certain amount of “willful dooming” should be grounds to remove people from forum sliding. Or at least temporary ban.

1
bgny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dooming is a bannable offense per the rules.

1
NazisWereSocialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

You still call Bill Clinton President, it does seem to me to make Q references but that’s not necessarily the devolution theory that Biden is an actor right?

20
AllowMeToExplain 20 points ago +20 / -0

He did use the term "treason"

7
jasqid 7 points ago +8 / -1

That word has been thrown around a lot the last 6 years but the last time I saw anyone pay the price was Benedict Arnold.

Actually.. Kawakita.

7
WhiteHouseDog 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Rosenburgs. Death sentence in the 1950s.

3
Cozette 3 points ago +3 / -0

"I saw". How old ARE you or are you implying you have a time machine and used it? :)

0
BoatingAccident 0 points ago +2 / -2

Doomer!!!!!!

4
polish_snausage 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, Three times he said treasonous

16
Badgertime33 16 points ago +16 / -0

he's not going to literally say "devolution is in effect"...

if anything, he might let the deep state assets ADMIT AND DISCLOSE that devolution is in effect!!

wouldn't it be funny if the 1/6 committee uncovers the PEADs and discloses that they are not only real but in effect??

7
ILoveIvermectin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lit must be shown that the civil government is fully captured and corrupt.

“Military is the only way”.

3
Yeetthedems 3 points ago +3 / -0

4.2.5 Preserve the Continuity of Operations. • Maintain comprehensive and effective continuity of operations, including appropriate devolution, to ensure the preservation of the United States Government’s structure under the U.S. Constitution and the continuing performance of National Essential Functions under all conditions. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf

5
GizzardPuke 5 points ago +5 / -0

Doomy fuck.

1
GAWker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not even the word devolution?

2
Greekish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rumors circulated that the Justices devolved to shouting...

6
Cook_My_Robin 6 points ago +6 / -0

"And how about if they widened the search even more? The numbers become astronomical, and the results would be a landslide victory for Trump. It is all on live tape produced by the government"

"We have it all" vibes.

3
50StateLandslide 3 points ago +4 / -1

There isn't really a hint of proof, but I suppose anons are clinging to the fact that Trump declared himself the victor in 2020 and called himself the president of the US.

To me, no proof was there whatsoever, because you can't say "Trump confirms devolution in letter" where he dedicates a paragraph's worth of sentences to claiming victory, and another 11 pages to saying that Biden is running America into the ground and is the President despite fraud.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0