I've seen some of the "viruses aren't real" stuff and what I think they are talking about is possibly true but all it really does is point out that viruses aren't what we think they are.
The gist-
If a problem is happening in your body there is a cellular mess going on and that leaves a certain genetic signature, and that is a "virus" and the body knows to react to it. It knows to come clean things up until the problem goes away.
You can take that "virus" (genetic signature of cellular garbage) and put it in someone else and their body will react similarly. I'm guessing that you can sneeze out a virus and someone else can pick it up and the body might cause a reaction to its presence.
So, a virus is whatever it is, but it may not be what we have been told.
And it's entirely possible that things happen to make people sick that are attributed to viruses that aren't really caused by viruses.
You know, it's getting hard to know what to believe anymore.
Viruses are invented boogeymen. They are a "concept". Your take is pretty good here. But the problem is, these "virologists" can't FIND any "viruses" in sick people. Not in their tissues (lung in this case), and not in their bodily fluids. Their excuse? That there aren't enough to find. When asked if they could find "viruses" in a vat of 10,000 sick people's bodily fluids, the virologists answer is the same; "not enough there to find".
The ONLY WAY they can "find viruses" is by their phony "viral culturing" method. Where they take abnormal green monkey kidney cells (aka "vero cells"), sprinkle in FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum) for nutrition to keep them alive, and then add antibiotics which are known poisons to kidneys (under the guise of "sterilizing the culture"), followed by the bodily fluids of a sick person. This magical recipe then produces "viruses" by the millions remarkably.
But there's one little problem with this sleight-of-hand sorcery. And that is, you can produce the same "viruses" without adding the bodily fluids of the sick person. Their "cytopathic effect" is obviously caused by the antibiotic poisons, as Dr. Stefan Lanka experimentally proved.
In short, their "viruses" are nothing but decayed green monkey kidney cells. This is "virology".
More recently, they've gone to an even darker layer of abstraction with their "in silico" computer modeled "viruses". This is what they did with so-called "SARS-COV2". They took a dead guys lung tissue, entered into their computer programs that read the RNA/DNA sequences of a bunch of his particulate matter. They then programmatically ASSEMBLED these little chunks of RNA & DNA into something entirely brand new that they literally made up. Their "made up thing" (SARS-COV2) does not exist in reality --- it only exists inside their computer programs.
Congratulations, you now fully understand the pseudoscience known as "virology". There really isn't anything more to it than sheer fantasy.
For the past 2 years, over 2000 people went on a hunt for published scientific experiments demonstrating human-to-human transmission of any "germs". We scoured PubMed and all the other journals and medical research we could find. Much to everyone's surprise, we found exactly ZERO successful attempts to demonstrate transmission. We found a total of 14 mentions, only 8 of which that provided their scientific findings. In all 8, the researchers were unable to "pass disease" from the sick to healthy person. The army tried this for over a month during the 1918-19 "deadliest ever" "Spanish Flu" scamdemic. They were unable to make a single healthy person sick after having sick people cough, sneeze, spit right in their faces, by swabbing the sick person's throats and noses and then rubbing it into the healthy person's nose and mouth. The other 7 experiments included attempts to spread TB, polio (to orphans no less), small pox etc. All failed to demonstrate a single instance of passing the disease. They couldn't do it with "viruses" (which don't exist) or bacteria (which DO exist).
Germ theory is a hoax from beginning to end. Louis Pasteur was a bigger liar than Anthony Fauci, and that's tough to do! Pasteur started this mess and the cabal has been forever grateful to him for it.
When you're "sick", your body is readjusting, rebalancing or rebuilding tissue in order to adapt to a variety of situations. What we call "sickness" is really more of a "healing" or "restoration" back to homeostasis.
Amazing information! By "WE" does that mean you were part of this group who scoured medical research/journals in search of evidence of human-to-human transmission of a germ? Can we have more information about this group and their research?
How would you explain the apparent infection or transmission of germs/viruses/bad "stuff" we appear to be able to observe in the world? For example, an animal that has a bad infectious disease appears to spread it to other nearby animals. Humans who are sick appear to spread the illness amongst others to where they have the same/similar symptoms, especially within the same household. How do you explain that phenomena if that entire model is a lie?
Not saying you are wrong, just wondering what your take is on that.
I was/am part of that group. It was just an informal effort that doctors Cowan and Kaufman followers took part in. Part of this group were also "germ supporters" who were desperate to support the "germ theory" model. Our research was simply to locate, in all the annals of our historic "scientific research", examples of human-to-human transmission of disease - in multiple countries I might add. US, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Canada, etc.
Your next questions are good, and unfortunately, you're likely not going to like the answers. As far as animals go, I have done little or no research in this area. I certainly know about Pasteur's "anthrax" with the European sheep. This was caused by the "sheep dip" used at the time as an insecticide. It's primary ingredient was arsenic. So the "anthrax" is the result of bacteria clearing the arsenic out of their systems.
I also know "rabies" is a complete fraud. Pasteur killed thousands with his "rabies vaccine", even though less than 50 allegedly "dies of hydrophobia" every year before he came on the scene. Further, nobody was able to even "see" a so-called virus in his lifetime. Not until the mid-1930s, with the creation of the electron microscope could something so small could be seen. So the only thing he discovered was a new way to poison people.
Regarding humans, like "colds/flus" in the same household, the answer is both simple and infuriating depending on how you perceive it. Both are caused by a "stink conflict", meaning the person figuratively says "this stinks" to something in their life (in this case, "This stinks that my husband/wife/child has the flu"). The other members of the family then have their own psychological stink conflicts when their family members are sick. The difference between a cold and flu is the difference between the intensity and duration of the stink conflict. What's happening is your body is blocking your nasal passages and lungs to prevent them from LITERALLY smelling something that stinks!! Your psyche cannot distinguish between your FIGURATIVE thoughts and LITERAL reality. And further, the psyche, which controls your entire body, has no sense of "time". It goes into action immediately to protect you from the perceived threat. As an example, The "fear of death" activates what we call "lung cancer" immediately, as your psyche generates new lung alveoli to ensure you're getting enough oxygen (as the quickest way to die is due to lack of oxygen).
And the other tricky one is "chicken pox". The first child to get the pox is suffering a "separation conflict", almost always from his/her mother. This is why chicken pox almost always appears in kindergarteners and first graders here in the west. In other cultures that don't send children off to public schools, there are no cases of chicken pox. The harder part of understanding this one is of course how other kids can get it at a "chicken pox party". We vastly underestimate the power of our minds, especially a child's mind that has yet to have been fully indoctrinated into false beliefs. Because the child BELIEVES they're going to get the chicken pox, some are able to manifest it. They too feel "separated" and "scared" about the whole event as well. And the same is true for measles - also a separation conflict in young children first separated from their primary caregiver for many hours of the day. You'll find that it's usually the first child to get chicken pox or measles, that takes the longest to "heal". Most of the other children are over it in 2-3 days.
The bottom line is, we underestimate the power of our mind and body to a massive degree. I believe that virtually all diseases are caused by psychosomatic origins. You name it - cancers, degenerative diseases, skin disease, heart disease, diabetes, rashes, auto-immune diseases, etc. The surprising part of this is that your psyche is making bodily changes in order to assist you with managing the psychosomatic conflicts being entertained in the mind. Many are unavoidable based on our primitive survival instincts (food, water, territorial, nesting, identity, grouping instincts, etc.). But once you understand the nature of disease, which is almost always a "healing" or "restoration" process, you come to see how your psyche was trying to help you survive during a period of psychological conflict. When you get over the psychological conflict, your body returns itself to homeostasis, and this is what we've been indoctrinated into believing is a "disease" that "must be gotten rid of".
I'm sure you won't find my explanations satisfying, such is the nature of this radical departure from the orthodoxy and my general experience when first introducing these ideas to somebody new. I find the fastest and easiest way to convince somebody is to address a current or recent disease you've had. Once you see the correlation between your conflict and the disease, you'll be sold. You have my money-back guarantee on that! :)
Thanks for asking your questions and being curious.
this is a really interesting reply/been thinking about our thoughts a lot. reminds me of President Trump and the Power of Positive Thinking; we need to gain control of our mind. change our reality.
I've seen some of the "viruses aren't real" stuff and what I think they are talking about is possibly true but all it really does is point out that viruses aren't what we think they are.
The gist-
If a problem is happening in your body there is a cellular mess going on and that leaves a certain genetic signature, and that is a "virus" and the body knows to react to it. It knows to come clean things up until the problem goes away.
You can take that "virus" (genetic signature of cellular garbage) and put it in someone else and their body will react similarly. I'm guessing that you can sneeze out a virus and someone else can pick it up and the body might cause a reaction to its presence.
So, a virus is whatever it is, but it may not be what we have been told.
And it's entirely possible that things happen to make people sick that are attributed to viruses that aren't really caused by viruses.
You know, it's getting hard to know what to believe anymore.
Viruses are invented boogeymen. They are a "concept". Your take is pretty good here. But the problem is, these "virologists" can't FIND any "viruses" in sick people. Not in their tissues (lung in this case), and not in their bodily fluids. Their excuse? That there aren't enough to find. When asked if they could find "viruses" in a vat of 10,000 sick people's bodily fluids, the virologists answer is the same; "not enough there to find".
The ONLY WAY they can "find viruses" is by their phony "viral culturing" method. Where they take abnormal green monkey kidney cells (aka "vero cells"), sprinkle in FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum) for nutrition to keep them alive, and then add antibiotics which are known poisons to kidneys (under the guise of "sterilizing the culture"), followed by the bodily fluids of a sick person. This magical recipe then produces "viruses" by the millions remarkably.
But there's one little problem with this sleight-of-hand sorcery. And that is, you can produce the same "viruses" without adding the bodily fluids of the sick person. Their "cytopathic effect" is obviously caused by the antibiotic poisons, as Dr. Stefan Lanka experimentally proved.
In short, their "viruses" are nothing but decayed green monkey kidney cells. This is "virology".
More recently, they've gone to an even darker layer of abstraction with their "in silico" computer modeled "viruses". This is what they did with so-called "SARS-COV2". They took a dead guys lung tissue, entered into their computer programs that read the RNA/DNA sequences of a bunch of his particulate matter. They then programmatically ASSEMBLED these little chunks of RNA & DNA into something entirely brand new that they literally made up. Their "made up thing" (SARS-COV2) does not exist in reality --- it only exists inside their computer programs.
Congratulations, you now fully understand the pseudoscience known as "virology". There really isn't anything more to it than sheer fantasy.
For the past 2 years, over 2000 people went on a hunt for published scientific experiments demonstrating human-to-human transmission of any "germs". We scoured PubMed and all the other journals and medical research we could find. Much to everyone's surprise, we found exactly ZERO successful attempts to demonstrate transmission. We found a total of 14 mentions, only 8 of which that provided their scientific findings. In all 8, the researchers were unable to "pass disease" from the sick to healthy person. The army tried this for over a month during the 1918-19 "deadliest ever" "Spanish Flu" scamdemic. They were unable to make a single healthy person sick after having sick people cough, sneeze, spit right in their faces, by swabbing the sick person's throats and noses and then rubbing it into the healthy person's nose and mouth. The other 7 experiments included attempts to spread TB, polio (to orphans no less), small pox etc. All failed to demonstrate a single instance of passing the disease. They couldn't do it with "viruses" (which don't exist) or bacteria (which DO exist).
Germ theory is a hoax from beginning to end. Louis Pasteur was a bigger liar than Anthony Fauci, and that's tough to do! Pasteur started this mess and the cabal has been forever grateful to him for it.
When you're "sick", your body is readjusting, rebalancing or rebuilding tissue in order to adapt to a variety of situations. What we call "sickness" is really more of a "healing" or "restoration" back to homeostasis.
Amazing information! By "WE" does that mean you were part of this group who scoured medical research/journals in search of evidence of human-to-human transmission of a germ? Can we have more information about this group and their research? How would you explain the apparent infection or transmission of germs/viruses/bad "stuff" we appear to be able to observe in the world? For example, an animal that has a bad infectious disease appears to spread it to other nearby animals. Humans who are sick appear to spread the illness amongst others to where they have the same/similar symptoms, especially within the same household. How do you explain that phenomena if that entire model is a lie? Not saying you are wrong, just wondering what your take is on that.
Thanks!
I was/am part of that group. It was just an informal effort that doctors Cowan and Kaufman followers took part in. Part of this group were also "germ supporters" who were desperate to support the "germ theory" model. Our research was simply to locate, in all the annals of our historic "scientific research", examples of human-to-human transmission of disease - in multiple countries I might add. US, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Canada, etc.
Your next questions are good, and unfortunately, you're likely not going to like the answers. As far as animals go, I have done little or no research in this area. I certainly know about Pasteur's "anthrax" with the European sheep. This was caused by the "sheep dip" used at the time as an insecticide. It's primary ingredient was arsenic. So the "anthrax" is the result of bacteria clearing the arsenic out of their systems.
I also know "rabies" is a complete fraud. Pasteur killed thousands with his "rabies vaccine", even though less than 50 allegedly "dies of hydrophobia" every year before he came on the scene. Further, nobody was able to even "see" a so-called virus in his lifetime. Not until the mid-1930s, with the creation of the electron microscope could something so small could be seen. So the only thing he discovered was a new way to poison people.
Regarding humans, like "colds/flus" in the same household, the answer is both simple and infuriating depending on how you perceive it. Both are caused by a "stink conflict", meaning the person figuratively says "this stinks" to something in their life (in this case, "This stinks that my husband/wife/child has the flu"). The other members of the family then have their own psychological stink conflicts when their family members are sick. The difference between a cold and flu is the difference between the intensity and duration of the stink conflict. What's happening is your body is blocking your nasal passages and lungs to prevent them from LITERALLY smelling something that stinks!! Your psyche cannot distinguish between your FIGURATIVE thoughts and LITERAL reality. And further, the psyche, which controls your entire body, has no sense of "time". It goes into action immediately to protect you from the perceived threat. As an example, The "fear of death" activates what we call "lung cancer" immediately, as your psyche generates new lung alveoli to ensure you're getting enough oxygen (as the quickest way to die is due to lack of oxygen).
And the other tricky one is "chicken pox". The first child to get the pox is suffering a "separation conflict", almost always from his/her mother. This is why chicken pox almost always appears in kindergarteners and first graders here in the west. In other cultures that don't send children off to public schools, there are no cases of chicken pox. The harder part of understanding this one is of course how other kids can get it at a "chicken pox party". We vastly underestimate the power of our minds, especially a child's mind that has yet to have been fully indoctrinated into false beliefs. Because the child BELIEVES they're going to get the chicken pox, some are able to manifest it. They too feel "separated" and "scared" about the whole event as well. And the same is true for measles - also a separation conflict in young children first separated from their primary caregiver for many hours of the day. You'll find that it's usually the first child to get chicken pox or measles, that takes the longest to "heal". Most of the other children are over it in 2-3 days.
The bottom line is, we underestimate the power of our mind and body to a massive degree. I believe that virtually all diseases are caused by psychosomatic origins. You name it - cancers, degenerative diseases, skin disease, heart disease, diabetes, rashes, auto-immune diseases, etc. The surprising part of this is that your psyche is making bodily changes in order to assist you with managing the psychosomatic conflicts being entertained in the mind. Many are unavoidable based on our primitive survival instincts (food, water, territorial, nesting, identity, grouping instincts, etc.). But once you understand the nature of disease, which is almost always a "healing" or "restoration" process, you come to see how your psyche was trying to help you survive during a period of psychological conflict. When you get over the psychological conflict, your body returns itself to homeostasis, and this is what we've been indoctrinated into believing is a "disease" that "must be gotten rid of".
I'm sure you won't find my explanations satisfying, such is the nature of this radical departure from the orthodoxy and my general experience when first introducing these ideas to somebody new. I find the fastest and easiest way to convince somebody is to address a current or recent disease you've had. Once you see the correlation between your conflict and the disease, you'll be sold. You have my money-back guarantee on that! :)
Thanks for asking your questions and being curious.
this is a really interesting reply/been thinking about our thoughts a lot. reminds me of President Trump and the Power of Positive Thinking; we need to gain control of our mind. change our reality.