My thought was oofo, but I didn't want to say oofo, because, you know, whether aliens are flying their craft around our planet or not, or whether oofos are our hidden tech or not, the primary thing an oofo machine produces, is cognitive dissonance.
Basically if anyone still doesn't understand at this point that UFOs are 100% real, and numerous, there isn't much more that can be done to help them. I was the biggest skeptic in the world. But now the US Navy has officially admitted to it FFS. NASA astronauts have admitted to seeing them while orbiting earth, with video proof.
People say they want proof, and then they disregard all video evidence, no matter how voluminous and credible.
Short of a personal alien visitation and being allowed to briefly pilot the spacecraft, what would they ever find convincing? Some of them still can't understand that the earth is spherical.
I made up "oofo" (I think I made it up) because I got tired of saying "U" "F" "O" in my mind every time I would read it (plus I think it's funny).
As for UAP's being real, I think that's pretty evident (I also was a huge skeptic prior to recent declas). I mean, the choices at this point are:
The U.S. Navy/government is hoaxing us on oofos
They exist, and represent technology that has mastered gravity.
If you choose (1), then you must believe that the U.S. Government is conspiring to lie about their existence OPPOSITE to their previous lie. It's quite the conundrum because in every case, whatever you choose you are a... Conspiracy Theorist!
If you choose (2) that has subsections of choice:
It's Aliens
It's hidden tech.
These are not mutually exclusive. Some could be aliens, some hidden tech e.g.
Alternatively, we could have a hidden relationship with aliens and they could have given us this tech.
Alternatively we could have FOUND them (say, in the Nevada desert in the 1940s) and reverse engineered their tech.
Alternatively, this could be "new" tech for us (relatively speaking, i.e. Teslatech), no aliens involved.
Alternatively, we could have had this tech for a long time (millennia), no aliens involved.
I have seen evidence that supports all of those alternatives. I have no idea or leanings in any direction, except that I think the specific oofos shown by the Navy are "ours."
Definitely not, unless we engineered them from tech we got from "them". They move unlike anything on earth, disconnected from the normal laws of physics. Antigravity. No sound. No wings or rotors. No air resistance. Unreal acceleration.
The object is moving fast then appears to hit insane speed and then lightning which does not hit the ground so it appears to be generated by the object flying.
Could be a weather balloon refracting the light from Venus.
My thought was oofo, but I didn't want to say oofo, because, you know, whether aliens are flying their craft around our planet or not, or whether oofos are our hidden tech or not, the primary thing an oofo machine produces, is cognitive dissonance.
u/#aliens
Funny! Haven't seen that one before
Basically if anyone still doesn't understand at this point that UFOs are 100% real, and numerous, there isn't much more that can be done to help them. I was the biggest skeptic in the world. But now the US Navy has officially admitted to it FFS. NASA astronauts have admitted to seeing them while orbiting earth, with video proof.
People say they want proof, and then they disregard all video evidence, no matter how voluminous and credible.
Short of a personal alien visitation and being allowed to briefly pilot the spacecraft, what would they ever find convincing? Some of them still can't understand that the earth is spherical.
I made up "oofo" (I think I made it up) because I got tired of saying "U" "F" "O" in my mind every time I would read it (plus I think it's funny).
As for UAP's being real, I think that's pretty evident (I also was a huge skeptic prior to recent declas). I mean, the choices at this point are:
If you choose (1), then you must believe that the U.S. Government is conspiring to lie about their existence OPPOSITE to their previous lie. It's quite the conundrum because in every case, whatever you choose you are a... Conspiracy Theorist!
If you choose (2) that has subsections of choice:
These are not mutually exclusive. Some could be aliens, some hidden tech e.g.
Alternatively, we could have a hidden relationship with aliens and they could have given us this tech.
Alternatively we could have FOUND them (say, in the Nevada desert in the 1940s) and reverse engineered their tech.
Alternatively, this could be "new" tech for us (relatively speaking, i.e. Teslatech), no aliens involved.
Alternatively, we could have had this tech for a long time (millennia), no aliens involved.
I have seen evidence that supports all of those alternatives. I have no idea or leanings in any direction, except that I think the specific oofos shown by the Navy are "ours."
Definitely not, unless we engineered them from tech we got from "them". They move unlike anything on earth, disconnected from the normal laws of physics. Antigravity. No sound. No wings or rotors. No air resistance. Unreal acceleration.
Little known fact, when you engage an FTL within the atmosphere, it creates tremendous amounts of static electricity. 🛸💨
The object is moving fast then appears to hit insane speed and then lightning which does not hit the ground so it appears to be generated by the object flying.
it could be an illegal alien spaceship refracting the light from uranus
top kek!
Yeah... or a miniature black hole racing thru the atmosphere at ludicrous speed.