I purchased an old encyclopedia (5 volumes, thousands of illustrated pages) from 1928 (with addenda from 1934). Hitler was then unknown and Palestine was the World’s top producer of oranges… unlike the desert they say it was.
What have you noticed?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Yeah Q is not about saving some rando lazy ass a lot of time.
Bingo big shooter. Q wants us to do our own research and make our own opinions/decisions based on the work we put in on the research. Plus it then makes it very hard for the MSM to discredit because usually we got the SAUCE
Let’s crowdsource it: search your attic, visit the garage sales, ask your Grandpa…
Everyone should look in the old literature for clues about how it really was back then, and not how it is felt today. When the Commies took over Yugoslavia, back then, then burnt many books, registers and also places of Worship in order to make their lies the only referenciable « truth ». That’s what the Woketards are doing to themselves and also us now.
(Note that Yugoslavia didn’t exist as such until the post WW1 Versailles Treaty, BTW, so I guess its very existence was a part of that lie)
I don't have any modern history books that I can find atm. I'm quite good on WW2 and very little on 1. I know Himmler might've survived WW2 and the British intelligence services quite possibly faked his death. But there's definitely something here. I'm maybe thinking it has something to do with the methods of control the Nazis used. Some of what they did was very sinister that not many people know about what they did just to control their populace
might've or might have. (Of is not a verb.)
Can't believe I did that after my da took the piss out of his mate for that yesterday. I'll correct it, thanks very much
Many changes. That's the point of looking it up. Everything from discussion of the damage from nukes, to the numbers of casualties, what happened in the concentration camps, and the origin of the conflicts. The fact that (stateless) judea declared war on Germany (sort of like a Jewish fatwa I suppose) before Germany passed discriminatory laws against Jews. The poverty that the WW1 armistice forced on Germany and the social decline that ensued in terms of crime and sexual depravity. Lots of stuff. Just the fact that history is aggressively rewritten and changed should be alarming on its own.
Many posts here have discussed it. Pay attention to the ones with the "cabal history" flair, and the khazarian mafia.
No problem. A couple more: Patton's death. Operation Paperclip. There was discussion at the time that The Diary of Ann Frank, taught nationwide almost as if it were national curriculum today, was fabricated. And of course the huge federal consolidation of power during WWII. History books today totally gloss over the opposition to FDR. And the Scandinavian role- they weren't pro-nazi as much as they were anti-commie. I got a pretty good history education back in the 80s, but missed a lot of that dynamic. Some parts of the Japanese army took many months to surrender, in part because they disbelieved the nuclear narrative. You'd think the Japanese would be better informed about it than the people in Europe and the US. You have to dig to get that stuff.
Pertaining to the bombs dropped on Japan... You're right, you'd think Japan of all places would know if two atomic bomb just disintegrated two large cities. Very dasting... 🤔 I'll need to look into that
Idk about judea declaring war on Germany. Where did you read that?
It's been brought up a lot. The battle for europa movie, among others. Here's one from a quick search. https://www.historiography-project.org/1933/03/24/judea-declares-war-on-germany/
Well. Nazism was very anti-Jewish so it doesn't surprise me that the jews wanted to declare war on nazism. But there's the allegation that WW2 was constructed and planned. We need to find out who was whispering in the ear of Adolph to give him the messed up ideology he had.
But there must be something big they are trying to censor. What truth do they not want to be told about WW1/WW2?
WW1: depopulate due to threat of communism (Tsar removed in Russia)
WW2: changed many E Eurpean country's borders; puppets set up (Mao etc) formation of EU to avoid future conflict. And there's that pesky holocaust problem: Auschwitz victim numbers down from 6m to just over 1m; Guild ridden Germans now overrun by muslims. Nazi a very useful censoring device...
DS consolidation: communism v capitalism, Cold War, armament manufacturers turning huge profits. And much, much more.
I think it was so people could learn for themselves rather than it coming directly from Q. Can't teach people to think for themselves if they are not willing to discover things by their own means
My theory? Those wars were not only money/power grabs, but also giant sacrifice rituals for moloch or whatever demon the Thule society was into at that time. Apparently Hitler was very interested in the occult from what I've heard
Not Hitler so much although he did have an interest. Was more of Himmler's thing
Yep. You would be correct. Thanks for setting me straight fren!
See my other comment in the thread.