Pretty powerful 🔥”A message to the Left, from a gay man. It wasn’t enough”🔥 The great awakening is expanding (link to original tweet in comments)
(media.greatawakening.win)
đź’Š BIG RED PILL đź’Š
Referring to any of your fellow Americans as inherently evil and a cancer on society because you disagree with their life choices is the exact same way the left wing has treated conservatives in this country for years.
"They want you divided. They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc. Divided you are weak [no collective power]. Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them]."
I wrote their lifestyle was inherently evil. And it is. Regardless of what you think and how you feel about them, it is.
There has been zero net benefit to this country from that lifestyle being allowed to rot our society.
It is tantamount to a Pandora's Box being opened. And that is exactly what happened the day they opened the door to homosexuality and feminism.
Summarizing the entirety of a person's lifestyle based on a couple characteristics like sexuality as inherently evil is not helping anyone. If anything, you are actively destroying your own ability to reach the ears of people who otherwise may be open to listening to good arguments and changing their minds on various topics.
I would also say it's rather demeaning to boil down the entirety of a person's existence to just a few key traits and pretending like that really summarizes inherent nature. I know a ton of Christians who are plenty fine with being a terrible person to others 6 days a week and praying on the last one.
Just like the post above, if a gay person really wrote and thinks that (which let's be real - there 100% are people like that who exist - maybe not the majority or the norm, but they exist) do you really believe that talking down to them from your high horse and telling them directly, "There has been net zero benefit to this country from that lifestyle being allowed to rot our society", or essentially, 'You have no value to society' in other words, is helping anyone?
It's not.
And I don't get my morality from random strangers on the internet either, so pardon me for not hopping on the bandwagon. Everyone else is only human, they know no more or less than any other human about the potential existence of god and any ramifications of morality it ensues. People who claim to are con artists. That is why belief is referred to as "faith", not "fact". Religion is by design structured around belief.
If you really believe that their lifestyle is inherently evil, then fine. Leave it up to the god you believe in to judge them. You aren't the judge and your word matters no more than any other's in regard to morality, because you aren't privy to some special divine insight on these matters. In the end, two people can only end up talking past each other if this is how you want to proceed.
I think this rhetoric is overwhelmingly destructive to the most important goals of anons, which is waking people up and getting them united on the most important issues like our constitutional rights and the corruption in DC. I would happily accept the political support of any American who calls out the groomers for what they are, regardless of whoever they stick it in at home (as long as it is legal and consensual, of course).
You keep associating what I write about lifestyle with some individual person. Not sure what you don't understand. The lifestyle, promoted outward and accepted by society in it's institutions brings about nothing but inherent evils because the lifestyle is inherent evil as told to us by God as clear as day. And if you don't believe in God then you can observe the degeneration of the US and correlate it with the acceptance of homosexuality and feminism.
It's almost as if you can't see what it brought about the moment society accepted that "they just want to blend in and be normal" was okay.
There are far more important issues than just Constitutional Rights, fren. Without a society that understands the most important things are God followed by family, there is no Constitutional Rights.
I never argued that two people wanting to do whatever they want to do in private is my business. I very specifically wrote, several times now, it's when those decisions enter the *public" and any of it's institutions that the problems begin.
I'm not sitting on a high horse, I'm calling it what it is and no matter how much you want to defend them and accept their shit into your home, your life and whatever else, it's not going to change the reality of the situation.
Your morality is from the education system, mine comes from a higher power.
Look, I don't want to berate you or beat a dead horse on this, but I just think you are wrong about a lot here and I'd rather be honest. None of this is out of ill will, either.
---Again, this is how you are talking about your fellow man with direct quotes. This is what I mean when I say "Destructive":
"The problem with him is that he doesn't understand that his lifestyle is inherently evil and the idea that he just wanted to blend into society was never going to work. It's like saying "I just want this cancer to blend in with the rest of my healthy body". No, it doesn't work. Eventually, that cancer is going to spread because it's nature is to spread."
"There is no such thing as blending in. That community should have no say in society when it comes to their lifestyle. It should not be accepted and there will never be a time where that lifestyle will simply blend in and not corrupt the rest of society even if they got rid of all "others" like trannies and infinite gender freaks."
---This is YOUR morality, not mine or anyone else's. These are YOUR beliefs, and they are BELIEFS not FACTS, as direct quotes. This is how you look down on others:
"I wrote their lifestyle was inherently evil. And it is. Regardless of what you think and how you feel about them, it is." <- This is called an opinion, not a fact. If it were really fact, it would be falsifiable. It is not an equation that can be proven.
"The lifestyle, promoted outward and accepted by society in it's institutions brings about nothing but inherent evils because the lifestyle is inherent evil as told to us by God as clear as day." <- This sounds like assuming you are the voice of god
"Homosexuality is described by Abrahamic religions as filth and one of the gravest sins. In fact, it shakes Gods throne in rage it's so disgusting." <- your opinion again in following a system of belief (not fact).
You might even be right about your system of belief, who knows. But you don't even entertain for a second you could be wrong. And for the record, I entirely agree that I do not want institutions compromised with any form of identitarian politics like sexuality and education of children. But again, the quotes above are not representative of political action so much as prejudice. Not necessarily unfounded prejudice, but a kind of prejudice. Which is not helping anybody.
Most egregious though, is this one to me:
"Your morality is from the education system, mine comes from a higher power." <- almost as if sitting on a high horse, huh? I guarantee you, I've spent far more time in my life actually evaluating, debating, and pondering the nature of morality and god than you seem to think. I'm quite the fan of works of Friederick Nietzsche, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, and Leo Tolstoy, especially in context of the topic of religion.
You assume far too much of everyone, and immediately look down upon me when I haven't even said what I think of gay people, if/and/or what god I believe in, how I treat others, or my politics. You knew none of that, and just assumed you knew it all at the drop of a hat, and can sum it up as "Morality from the education system". In other words, "I am better than you" seems more apt to say.
I can't stand that kind of arrogance.
I'm not a doctor, but I am fairly sure that sins are not contagious. At least not to people without a predisposition to engage in those sins. Pretty much like everything else. If you are afraid of catching the gay, you might be struggling with something. Do not judge, lest you be judged. And it is always a genuine pleasure meeting someone who is without sin that gets to cast the first stone.
That's not what I wrote at all lol. Nor did I cast the first stone. I wrote that the lifestyle is inherently corrupt and evil. Again, it doesn't mean jack to me if people want to do what they want to do in private.
I don't want it to be promoted into society as a normal function (it's not). You wanna get close with your butt buddies? Go ahead. I don't want it promoted in any way in education, institutions, government, sports, media whatever.
Pride parade should be non existent and never celebrated. This is my point that seems to have gone over your head
I was making light of a pretty serious conversation. I really don't have any problems with how you feel or what you believe. I don't have a dog in the fight for homosexuality. I don't jugde because it is not my place to do so. That is between them and God. If he chooses to punish them, that is his and his alone to decide. If he decides not to, I will gladly accept his decision. I am merely another servant and know my place.
Ah. Paulism at it's finest. A man making declarations of things he may be right about, but also may be wrong.
If you agree with Paul, that's your business. I find the notion of needing more interpretation beyond Jesus to be absurd, especially when relying on such for absolution.
Careful, fren.
Paul (formerly Saul) was chosen by Jesus Christ Himself (Acts 9:3-6)
Now as he went on his way, he approached Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven shone around him. And falling to the ground, he heard a voice saying to him, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?” And he said, “Who are you, Lord?” And he said, “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. But rise and enter the city, and you will be told what you are to do.”
Paul's authority was authenticated by miracles (Acts 19:11-12):
And God was doing extraordinary miracles by the hands of Paul, so that even handkerchiefs or aprons that had touched his skin were carried away to the sick, and their diseases left them and the evil spirits came out of them.
It's not Paul that seems to be a problem for you. It appears more like a rejection of Holy Scripture because you don't like what it teaches.
Ask God for understanding and seek out commentaries on Paul's writings.
If you need help getting started, here's a commentary on Paul's letter to the Roman Christians.
OP referred to the person's lifestyle as inherently evil, not the person himself.
And OP is correct. That is the difference between the left and Christians. When the left call the Christian lifestyle evil, they are wrong. When Christians call a satanic lifestyle evil, we are right.
We should always remember to 'love the sinner, but hate the sin', and not confuse the two as you have done.