We don't censor opposing ideas, in fact, we're even known for stickying them. This is one of the richest destinations for debate and discussion on the entire Internet—but standards will apply. Doomers and other assorted losers posting low effort, low info comments and posts are the equivalent of streakers running onto the field naked for attention, and field security (ie, the mod team) will continue to tag, bag, and relocate these rehabs to the sidelines where they belong.
I know for certain that this is an untrue statement. I don't know how often it happens, but I know that it does, and have seen it happen at least a dozen times myself, whether you realize it or not.
Doomers and other assorted losers posting low effort, low info comments and posts
I am not talking about "low info" or "low effort" comments. I know for a fact that many ideas in opposition to the consensus beliefs of "pro-Q" people have been censored, and people banned for expressing them. These comments were engaged in earnest and were still censored. I have had some really good conversations deleted because of this censorship (I was not the one being censored in all of those cases, but was engaging someone who was in earnest). That is not the path.
Why are we calling people "losers?" How is that helpful? That very concept is the antithesis of the GA. If someone is a doomer, and their beliefs and opinions are in earnest, then help them see the evidence. Even if they don't see it (which is common) other's will, and that exposure is a potent weapon in the learning and awakening process for all the world.
I know for certain that this is an untrue statement. I don't know how often it happens, but I know that it does, and have seen it happen at least a dozen times myself, whether you realize it or not.
Yep, happened to me.
You and I have had our disagreements, Slyver, but we are united 100% on this issue.
GAW does, in fact, have mods who censor topics and opinions they do not like, having nothing at all to do with violating any terms of the website.
It's not about topics we don't "like," but topics which are clearly not on Q, such as Flat Earth, chemtard BS ("Spain" doesn't account for the lines over your house) and all other assorted garbage. This WIN rules because it is kept on track. Our mod log is open to the public.
Let me ask you a hypothetical. What if it turns out that "Chemtrails" are real. This is just a hypothetical, I'm not going to post on the mountains of evidence to support it. If it is real, and an active play against We The People, isn't such censorship harming people? Don't we need to know? Maybe if it is real, we can find ways of reducing the damage it does to our lives. There is no way to know if the topic is silenced.
Now let's say its not real, how can we know if we aren't allowed to debate the evidence? HOW CAN WE KNOW???
If the debate is silenced, we can't really understand the full agenda of the Cabal. We can't really understand what it is we need to focus on, and fight against. Censorship of dissenting topics never aids in an investigation into the Truth.
We don't censor opposing ideas, in fact, we're even known for stickying them. This is one of the richest destinations for debate and discussion on the entire Internet—but standards will apply. Doomers and other assorted losers posting low effort, low info comments and posts are the equivalent of streakers running onto the field naked for attention, and field security (ie, the mod team) will continue to tag, bag, and relocate these rehabs to the sidelines where they belong.
I know for certain that this is an untrue statement. I don't know how often it happens, but I know that it does, and have seen it happen at least a dozen times myself, whether you realize it or not.
I am not talking about "low info" or "low effort" comments. I know for a fact that many ideas in opposition to the consensus beliefs of "pro-Q" people have been censored, and people banned for expressing them. These comments were engaged in earnest and were still censored. I have had some really good conversations deleted because of this censorship (I was not the one being censored in all of those cases, but was engaging someone who was in earnest). That is not the path.
Why are we calling people "losers?" How is that helpful? That very concept is the antithesis of the GA. If someone is a doomer, and their beliefs and opinions are in earnest, then help them see the evidence. Even if they don't see it (which is common) other's will, and that exposure is a potent weapon in the learning and awakening process for all the world.
Yep, happened to me.
You and I have had our disagreements, Slyver, but we are united 100% on this issue.
GAW does, in fact, have mods who censor topics and opinions they do not like, having nothing at all to do with violating any terms of the website.
Those mods should be identified and rooted out.
It's not about topics we don't "like," but topics which are clearly not on Q, such as Flat Earth, chemtard BS ("Spain" doesn't account for the lines over your house) and all other assorted garbage. This WIN rules because it is kept on track. Our mod log is open to the public.
Let me ask you a hypothetical. What if it turns out that "Chemtrails" are real. This is just a hypothetical, I'm not going to post on the mountains of evidence to support it. If it is real, and an active play against We The People, isn't such censorship harming people? Don't we need to know? Maybe if it is real, we can find ways of reducing the damage it does to our lives. There is no way to know if the topic is silenced.
Now let's say its not real, how can we know if we aren't allowed to debate the evidence? HOW CAN WE KNOW???
If the debate is silenced, we can't really understand the full agenda of the Cabal. We can't really understand what it is we need to focus on, and fight against. Censorship of dissenting topics never aids in an investigation into the Truth.
It’s ironic because MasterJediPepe calls out catsfive for this in the comment thread above.