apparently the delta happened as anons from here were watching for it. So that's good news and seems to confirm that Q is back and all the previous "new Q" posts (4954,55,56,57 and 4958) were all Watkins trying to scam us.
Just to be logically thorough, it is possible that someone could have set a script to watch for Trump's truth, then immediately make the post on 8kun, and then fix the timestamp right away - we are talking about seconds here, and people watching it live could have missed it.
I do find it suspicious that the seconds match exactly. As far as I remember, they used to have trouble matching the seconds exactly because of two different platforms.
I find it sus that he calls out Jim Watkins by name. Was never his style for a couple of reasons.
Lots of bad actors. If the claims are true, is it not possible that the board is compromised by bad actors, not necessarily Jim? Wouldn’t it be more like Q to just say, as he has in the past, the board is compromised.
It almost sounds childish. “Jim locked me out!! Reeeee!”
He also state that his passphrase was not generating the correct trip. So where are the posts with the bad trip codes?
A lot of black hats are afraid of Q. Would love to see division and to discredit. We are going to have to use extra caution and discernment as it works itself out.
Not sure that applies the way you think- it was more than two different platforms, it was the ever-changing route that POTUS' messages took through the WH servers and firewalls versus the Chan routes. Now POTUS is on TS and I would have to believe that their timing is better established.
Its a legitimate question. Luckily zero deltas were just one part of the Q proof. We had Trump saying things people asked Q to get him to say. We had uncanny future predictions, and we saw Q stringers in action. So we were sure that Q was legit regardless of the deltas, and if Q at that time trusted CMZ then we have no reason to suspect the deltas as well.
Even with the new Q - I am expecting other proofs beyond deltas. The proof is always in the pudding.
Just to be logically thorough, it is possible that someone could have set a script to watch for Trump's truth, then immediately make the post on 8kun, and then fix the timestamp right away - we are talking about seconds here, and people watching it live could have missed it.
I do find it suspicious that the seconds match exactly. As far as I remember, they used to have trouble matching the seconds exactly because of two different platforms.
I find it sus that he calls out Jim Watkins by name. Was never his style for a couple of reasons.
Lots of bad actors. If the claims are true, is it not possible that the board is compromised by bad actors, not necessarily Jim? Wouldn’t it be more like Q to just say, as he has in the past, the board is compromised.
It almost sounds childish. “Jim locked me out!! Reeeee!”
He also state that his passphrase was not generating the correct trip. So where are the posts with the bad trip codes?
A lot of black hats are afraid of Q. Would love to see division and to discredit. We are going to have to use extra caution and discernment as it works itself out.
I agree, I immediately thought “locked out by Watkins” seemed out of character for a Q post.
Agree
the bad trips can't post, cause they need to be whitelisted.
Not sure that applies the way you think- it was more than two different platforms, it was the ever-changing route that POTUS' messages took through the WH servers and firewalls versus the Chan routes. Now POTUS is on TS and I would have to believe that their timing is better established.
Ignore what I said because looks like the 0 delta today did have around 10 second difference.
Pre or post DJT Truth? Anything post can be faked with a script, as you noted above.
Pre DJT Truth
Very good point. And if they can time their Deltas more consistently, we'll soon be past these discussions over authenticity.
Its a legitimate question. Luckily zero deltas were just one part of the Q proof. We had Trump saying things people asked Q to get him to say. We had uncanny future predictions, and we saw Q stringers in action. So we were sure that Q was legit regardless of the deltas, and if Q at that time trusted CMZ then we have no reason to suspect the deltas as well.
Even with the new Q - I am expecting other proofs beyond deltas. The proof is always in the pudding.